• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Omissions as actus reus

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Omissions as actus reus Normal rule is that omissions can?t make a person guilty of an offence. Exceptions to the rule ? 1. A duty undertaken voluntarily 2. A duty through one?s official position 3. A duty which arises because D has set in a motion a chain of events 4. A duty because of a relationship 5. A contractual duty 6. A statutory duty A statutory duty ? Act of Parl can create liability for a duty. For example failure to report a road traffic accident, and or failing to provide a specimen of breath. These offences can only be committed by failing to do something. For example s1 of the Children and Young person?s Act 1933 puts the parents who are legally responsible for a child under duty for providing food, clothes, medical aid and lodging for their children. ...read more.

Middle

A duty because of a relationship ? This is usually a parent ? child relationship and can also apply to an elder child who is looking after their elderly parent. In Gibbins v Proctor the father of a 7 year old child and his partner starved the young girl and kept her separate from the rest of his kids, the child died as a result of their failure to feed her. Although the child was not the woman?s she had assumed responsibility for the girl as she was living with the man and eating food provided by him. A duty voluntarily undertaken ? In Gibbins and Proctor the partner had voluntarily undertaken to look after the 7 year old child, she therefore had a duty towards the child. ...read more.

Conclusion

He was convicted of misconduct in a public place. He appealed on the ground that a failure to act does not create criminal liability. He lost. A duty which arises because the defendant set in motion a chain of events ? It is the concept of owing a duty and being liable through omission. In the case of Miller, the defendant was living in a squat, he had fell asleep with a lighted cigarette and the mattress had caught fire. He was woken up by the fire, but rather than attempting to put it out or seek help he went into another room and fell asleep. The house caught fire and was badly damaged. He appealed against his conviction for arson and argued that a failure to act is an omission and cannot therefore be established as the actus reus of the offence. He lost: it was possible to create liability by failing to remedy a dangerous situation that one has oneself created. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Criminal Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Criminal Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    English law does not normally impose liability for an omission or failure to act ...

    4 star(s)

    One of these is that the law can be expanded to involve more duty situations.

  2. Criminal offences are usually defined in terms of a guilty act (actus reus) and ...

    sufficient to justify conviction, the question that has to be answered is known as the 'but for' test. This is asking would the defendant have escaped the harm BUT FOR the defendants act. An example of this is R v Pagett 1983 However legal causation is where the fact that

  1. Property Offences, Corporate Manslaughter and Police Powers of Search and Entry.

    This is the killing which is caused by an event or situation which would most likely to cause a reasonable person to lose self-control and kill. For example, there was a case where D, subjected to 10 years of spousal violence and degradation, threw petrol in her husband's bedroom and set it alight, causing his death.

  2. 'Law should encourage citizens in their civic duty to do "the right thing" in ...

    They are only liable in cases of incompetence, as shown in the case of Adomako, where the defendant, an anaesthetist, failed to realise that one of the tubes supplying oxygen to the patient was disconnected. This resulted in the patient having a heart attack and dying six months later.

  1. Explain the meaning of Actus reus and mens rea

    NEGLIGENCE Explain the meaning of Duty of care The modern law is laid out in Caparo v Dickman 1990 where the following needed to be proved: That the harm was reasonably foreseeable to that type of person (this is effectively Lord Atkins? neighbour principle from Donoghue v Stevenson where it

  2. Nina runs a burger bar. She puts up a sign in the window saying ...

    Nina's actions would fulfill both of these aspects of the test, as she clearly knew she was being dishonest through her advertising, and any reasonable person would also reach this conclusion. From all of this analysis, it is possible to conclude that Nina has committed an act of fraud under Section 2(a)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work