• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Our constitution is dominated by the sovereignty of Parliament. But Parliamentary sovereignty is no longer, if it ever was, absolute. critically discuss.

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐In 2005, Lord Hope (declared), in the case ?Jackson and others (Appellants) v The Attorney General (Respondent)? said that ?our constitution is dominated by the sovereignty of Parliament. But Parliamentary sovereignty is no longer, if it ever was, absolute. It is no longer right to say that Parliament?s freedom to legislate admits of no qualification whatever. Step, by stem, gradually but surely, the English principle of the absolute sovereignty of Parliament which Dicey derived from Coke and Blackstone is being qualified?. It is a well-known fact, that most countries have a written constitution, therefore Great Britain does not, and however Parliamentary sovereignty is one of the fundamental principles of constitution in the United Kingdom. ?Sovereignty? is the word that Dicey used to describe the concept of ?the power of law-making unrestricted by any legal limit?. In short, he used to describe a legal concept. However, as Dicey himself acknowledged, ?sovereignty? is also capable of bearing political meanings.[1] This means that the highest source of English Law is Parliament. ...read more.


These approaches are dissimilar in opinion of extending sovereignty but they accord on the fact that few measures of parliamentary exist. Questionable is sovereignty whether been absolute or not, because internal and global developments have had an effect on creating several limitations. One of the most important issue was Devolution process; Professor Bogdanor once identified devolution as the process, which involves the dispersal of power from superior to an inferior political authority in details? it was a transfer from Westminster Parliament to a dependent administration. In such meaning, the Westminster Parliament remains supreme. In the act of devolution in 1998, Northern Ireland and Scotland separated from Westminster parliament since then Scottish Parliament; national assembly for Wales and Northern Ireland could manage their own legislations that can be affecting only these countries. Therefore these Acts gave an addition protection for sovereignty of the authority. Yet it will not be an easiest task to put a line between jurisdiction of dedicated governments and assemblies. ...read more.


The DC sought a preliminary ruling from ECJ on the substantive questions off EC law. In the meanwhile, it granted the applicants interim relief and misapplied the relevant part of the 1988 act and regulations. The CA set aside that order. The applicants appealed to the HL, which held that, as matter of English law, the courts did not have the jurisdiction to grand relief misapplying the act. The HL referred to the ECJ the question whether, as a matter of Community Law, that law should be set aside. HL held, that the relief would be granted.[2] In conclusion to Factortame (No2), Lord Bridge forwarded the issue of the influence of the decision on the supremacy of parliament, where the European Court of Justice ruled that ?a court which in those circumstances would grant interim relief, if it were not for a rule of national law, is obligated to set aside the rule? after this, the house of lords approved that the courts had a duty espouse EU law over national law when providing their judgment. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Parliamentary supremacy

    'If two inconsistent Acts were passed at different times, the last must be obeyed.' This is the case in Vauxhall Estates Limited v Liverpool Corporation5 whereby the claimant claimed compensation for land acquired from them on the basis of the Acquisition of Land (Assessment of Compensation)

  2. "In form, the Human Rights Act (HRA) is compatible with parliamentary sovereignty. In practice, ...

    the position enshrined in an Act that it has passed, but which is incompatible with the Convention in the eyes of a British court, it is that Act which will remain in force" (House of Commons Debate, 1998). Lord Woolf (2002)

  1. The most conventional meaning of the 'legislative supremacy of Parliament' was adopted by Dicey

    stated that: '(T)here is no judicial body in the country by which the validity of an Act of Parliament could be questioned. An Act of the legislature is superior in authority to any court of law. We have only to administer the law as we find it, and no court

  2. Evaluate the extent to which the Human Right Act 1998 is consistent with the ...

    The Act reconciles formal adherence to the doctrine of Parliamentary sovereignty with the need to enable the courts to provide effective legal remedies for breaches of Convention Rights.9 Although the HRA comes as close as empowering the courts to disapply a legislation that is inconsistent with the Convention Rights, it

  1. Should Britain have a codified constitution?

    It is undisputed that the thought of change would be pointless when we have a perfectly good, working, constitution, which may not be as organised as our Atlantic cousin's codified constitution, but still works in a democratic fair way. Yet an argument contradicting this point is the Rule of Law.

  2. Parliamentary Sovereignty

    By doing this, the UK now has to take on any law that is made by the European committee like the Human rights Act 1998.

  1. Public law - Acts of parliament

    For example, section 4 statute of Westminster 1931, states that: "No Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom shall extend to a dominion as part of the law of that dominion unless expressly requested and consented to by the dominion."

  2. It is not correct to say that the United Kingdom does not have a ...

    Thomas Paine stated that a constitution is a thing antecedent to a government and government is only the creature of a constitute ( Allen and Thompson, p.1). In this extent, we can say that a constitution will be supreme over a government.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work