• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Our constitution is dominated by the sovereignty of Parliament. But Parliamentary sovereignty is no longer, if it ever was, absolute. critically discuss.

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐In 2005, Lord Hope (declared), in the case ?Jackson and others (Appellants) v The Attorney General (Respondent)? said that ?our constitution is dominated by the sovereignty of Parliament. But Parliamentary sovereignty is no longer, if it ever was, absolute. It is no longer right to say that Parliament?s freedom to legislate admits of no qualification whatever. Step, by stem, gradually but surely, the English principle of the absolute sovereignty of Parliament which Dicey derived from Coke and Blackstone is being qualified?. It is a well-known fact, that most countries have a written constitution, therefore Great Britain does not, and however Parliamentary sovereignty is one of the fundamental principles of constitution in the United Kingdom. ?Sovereignty? is the word that Dicey used to describe the concept of ?the power of law-making unrestricted by any legal limit?. In short, he used to describe a legal concept. However, as Dicey himself acknowledged, ?sovereignty? is also capable of bearing political meanings.[1] This means that the highest source of English Law is Parliament. ...read more.


These approaches are dissimilar in opinion of extending sovereignty but they accord on the fact that few measures of parliamentary exist. Questionable is sovereignty whether been absolute or not, because internal and global developments have had an effect on creating several limitations. One of the most important issue was Devolution process; Professor Bogdanor once identified devolution as the process, which involves the dispersal of power from superior to an inferior political authority in details? it was a transfer from Westminster Parliament to a dependent administration. In such meaning, the Westminster Parliament remains supreme. In the act of devolution in 1998, Northern Ireland and Scotland separated from Westminster parliament since then Scottish Parliament; national assembly for Wales and Northern Ireland could manage their own legislations that can be affecting only these countries. Therefore these Acts gave an addition protection for sovereignty of the authority. Yet it will not be an easiest task to put a line between jurisdiction of dedicated governments and assemblies. ...read more.


The DC sought a preliminary ruling from ECJ on the substantive questions off EC law. In the meanwhile, it granted the applicants interim relief and misapplied the relevant part of the 1988 act and regulations. The CA set aside that order. The applicants appealed to the HL, which held that, as matter of English law, the courts did not have the jurisdiction to grand relief misapplying the act. The HL referred to the ECJ the question whether, as a matter of Community Law, that law should be set aside. HL held, that the relief would be granted.[2] In conclusion to Factortame (No2), Lord Bridge forwarded the issue of the influence of the decision on the supremacy of parliament, where the European Court of Justice ruled that ?a court which in those circumstances would grant interim relief, if it were not for a rule of national law, is obligated to set aside the rule? after this, the house of lords approved that the courts had a duty espouse EU law over national law when providing their judgment. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Is the UK Parliament still supreme with regards to enacting Acts of Parliament? Discuss.

    The Second Reading (which may be hotly contested) follows a discussion of the general principles of the bill. Traditionally, Second Reading was always taken on the floor of the House, but in recent years some uncontroversial bills (e.g. Law Commission measures) have been referred to a Second Reading Committee (and Scottish Bills to the Scottish Grand Committee before

  2. "In form, the Human Rights Act (HRA) is compatible with parliamentary sovereignty. In practice, ...

    the position enshrined in an Act that it has passed, but which is incompatible with the Convention in the eyes of a British court, it is that Act which will remain in force" (House of Commons Debate, 1998). Lord Woolf (2002)

  1. Parliamentary supremacy

    later Parliaments were bound by the 1832 Act and any changes had to be decided by the new House. However there is also evidence to suggest that parliament does follow the rule in not binding a successor or predecessor. Stated by Lord Langdale in Dean of Ely v Bliss4 that

  2. Should Britain have a codified constitution?

    The British Parliament is subject to no authority beyond itself and this goes against the principle of the rule of law which our democracy is based on. The ability to change a rule and go against a parliament cannot be unnoticed, so is it safe to stay as an un-codified

  1. Legislations and regulations in sport

    Thus with the exception of anonymised information most if not all NHS information concerning patients, whether held electronically or on paper, will fall within the scope of the Act. The inclusion of manual or paper based records within the scope of the Act is one of the major changes from the 1984 Act.

  2. Parliamentary Sovereignty

    By doing this, the UK now has to take on any law that is made by the European committee like the Human rights Act 1998.

  1. In English

    Walwyn-Jones' death. Mr. Walwyn-Jones had been the statutory tenant. According to paragraph 2 (1) of Schedule 1 to the Rent Act 1977 the right to a statutory tenancy passes to a surviving spouse. When this paragraph is not applicable, according to paragraph 3 (1), a 'family' member who has been residing with a tenant for two years before his/her death may enjoy the lesser protection of an assured tenancy.

  2. The most conventional meaning of the 'legislative supremacy of Parliament' was adopted by Dicey

    Following the events of the 'Glorious Revolution', the Bill of Rights 1688 did not take the form of a conventional 'rights' documents. However, arguably that it was as much about the 'wrongs' of James II as it was about the 'rights' of the people.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work