• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline a case for and against a written bill of rights.

Extracts from this document...


Outline a case for and against a written bill of rights Currently we British do not have a written bill of rights. A bill of rights is considered to be a special set of laws entrenched into the constitution which sets out the rights and freedoms that are enjoyed by every citizen. It is entrenched in the constitution which is vital because it means that it would be far more difficult for the executive to change it (this could be done in a number of ways, for example by making the majority needed for the bill to pass 70% rather than 50+1% for conventional laws). Currently in the UK we are a long way from this, we don't even have a codified constitution. In theory all British laws are the same. There is no difference between constitutional laws and normal laws, meaning there is no entrenchment and no extra difficulty in changing constitutional laws like there is in all other Western constitutions. ...read more.


Many would say it would put too many political decisions in the hands of judges political decisions should rest with the legislature. Judges would also be put in a difficult position because many exiting laws would conflict with a bill of rights. The rule of law demands a clear, enforceable statement of citizen's rights, a bill of rights would provide this is what many of those who want reform say. However the rule of law contains many dated suggestions and is the judiciary already not enforcing law effectively? Having such an uncompromising bill of rights surely wouldn't promote the evolution of the constitution which the British have enjoyed throughout history. It would possibly be so entrenched that once some constitutional laws became dated, they still couldn't be changed. At least the reliance upon conventions ensures laws that evolve. Also, the introduction of a bill of rights could lead to a full scale reformation of the constitution; this is what many are hoping for but I along with most others think that this would be wrong. ...read more.


If constitutional reform is what people want, there are however various other options. The government could create a department of justice which is itself be accountable and elected into power. This would replace the currently unelected, unaccountable Lord Chancellor's department. The creation of a supreme court, as a last means of appeal, rather than the House of Lords. This would separate the powers and make those in power more impartial and from a wider range of society. A fourth option is that judges could be elected, making them more representative of society. This however has many problems with it. I however am not so worried about what we shall do to our own constitution, rather what the big guns in Europe shall do if we join the United States of Europe, they will have a bill of rights which having looked at the evidence I am opposed to. If we join Europe, sovereignty will not lie with Westminster or the courts, instead with a commission that is looking out for a whole continent rather than just us. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. How has the European Court of Human Rights contributed to the protection of children's ...

    ECHR denying serious offenders judicial hearing, so it was amended. Such decisions on children's fair hearing have constructively influenced English law particularly; Dutch law similarly applied adult system to children throughout 1990's95. Similarly, the Court also established that procedures for dealing with parents in private and public law proceedings

  2. Should Britain have a codified constitution?

    For example you would have to have a two thirds majority in both houses or it would have to be passed by referendum. However I believe that this point does not have a sufficient amount of reason to be fully taken into consideration, in comparison one of the benefits of the current system is its flexibility.

  1. The rights of cohabitees- time for a change?

    The purpose of the remainder of this essay is to show the weakness of any legal arguments against legislative reform and to draw on the experience of other jurisdictions in analysing what a suitable form of legislation may be. Anticipated opposition to reform In Article 41.3.119 of the Irish Constitution

  2. Juvenile Justice

    Juveniles usually commit these offences as to get money. The ACT Human Rights Act 2004 came into power on 1 July 2004 and is Australia's first human rights legislation. The Human Rights Commissioner has permission to review and report to the Attorney General on compliance with the Act The purpose of this review was to ensure that the delivery

  1. Law case study

    The Children (Scotland) Act 1995 saw a change in direction especially in the terminology used. This was a move towards a more child centered approach, without losing the purpose that parents still have rights towards their children. What did change was more emphasis on responsibility.


    Thus, with the anthropological understanding of culture, cultural rights include the right to education, the right to participate in scientific progress and the right to information. It has been seen more recently in the World Summit for Social Development8 that the importance of recognition of culture cannot be established without implementation of cultural rights.

  1. Liberal reform 1906-1914

    and the government (2d). The worker still did benefit from this if they were sick as the slogan 'nine pence for four pence', used by Lloyd George to popularise this concept shows. However, for many workers, this was just a cut in their wage, and therefore may have further encouraged poverty.

  2. "The Australian Constitution is ill equipped to meet the demands of a modern, democratic ...

    Judges are able to be impartial and independent when making decisions and therefore are able to come to the correct decision, rather than one that may be popular. This however, places a great deal of power in judges that have not been democratically elected or accepted by the public.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work