• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Plea Bargains

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Plea Bargains [Name of the writer] [Name of the institution] Plea Bargains L?t u? b?gin by d?fining pl?a bargaining. Pl?a bargaining i? an ??ttl?m?nt b?tw??n th? d?f?ndant and th? pr???cut?r, and p?rmitt?d by th? c?urt judg?, in which th? d?f?ndant pl?ad? guilty ?r n? c?nt??t in ?rd?r t? hav? charg?? dr?pp?d, d?cr?a??d t? a crim? ?f l??? ??v?rity, ?r th? ??nt?nc? d?cr?a??d a? b??t a? th? thr?? ?id?? can b? in agr??m?nt up?n. Th?r? ar? f?ur diff?r?nt typ?? ?f pl?a bargain?: (1.) Charg? Bargaining, which i? wh?n th? d?f?ndant pl?ad? guilty t? a l??? ??v?r? crim? than initially ?nf?rc?d; (2.) C?urt Bargaining, which i? wh?n th? d?f?ndant pl?ad? guilty t? a ?mall?r numb?r ?f charg?; (3.) ??nt?nc? Bargaining, which i? wh?n th? d?f?ndant pl?ad? guilty und?r?tanding what th? judgm?nt t? b? giv?n will b?; (4.) Fact Bargaining, which i? wh?n th? d?f?ndant c?nf????? t? ?p?cific fact?, in ?xchang? f?r a d?al fr?m th? pr???cuti?n t? n?t pr???nt ?th?r ?p?cific fact? int? ?vid?nc?. My an?w?r a? t? wh?th?r ?r n?t th? natur? ?f a crim? ?h?uld aff?ct a d?f?ndant'? ?pp?rtunity t? pl?a bargain i?, n?, it ?h?uld n?t R?gardl??? ?f th? natur? ?f th? crim? ?ach and ?v?ry d?f?ndant ha? right? and d???rv?? a fair chanc?. Wh?th?r ?r n?t th? d?f?ndant tak?? th? ...read more.

Middle

t? i??u? at hand. Taking a ca?? t? trial can b?, and in m??t ca??? i?, a v?ry l?ngthy and ?tr???ful pr?c???. Taking th? ?ff?r?d pl?a bargain can r???lv? th? matt?r much m?r? quickly and l??? ?tr???fully. F?urth, pl?a bargaining c?uld al?? b?n?fit th? d?f?ndant by r??ulting in him/h?r having f?w?r ?r ?v?n l??? ??v?r? ?ff?n??? ?n hi?/h?r p?rman?nt r?c?rd. If th? d?f?ndant w?r? t? pl?ad guilty, ?r n? c?nt??t, in ?xchang? f?r a l??? ??v?r? charg?, ?r ?v?n a l?w?r ??nt?nc?, it w?uld l??k ?ignificantly b?tt?r ?n hi?/h?r p?rman?nt r?c?rd than any p???ibl? c?nvicti?n? r??ulting fr?m a trail. F?r ?xampl?, if a d?f?ndant ha? b??n charg?d with driving und?r th? influ?nc?, and h?/?h? t??k a pl?a bargain t? l?w?r th? charg? t? r?ckl??? driving, any futur? ??c?nd ?ff?n?? f?r driving und?r th? influ?nc? might n?t b? inv?lv? any jail tim? in th? ??nt?ncing. A fifth b?n?fit t? pl?a bargaining f?r th? d?f?ndant i? th? p???ibl? ability t? maintain c?rtain privil?g? lic?n??? ?r right?, Lik? th? right t? v?t? ?r ?wn a fir?arm, f?r in?tanc?. B?ing c?nvict?d ?f a f?l?ny r?v?k?? th??? privil?g?d right?. Al??, a f?l?ny c?nvicti?n c?uld b? u??d t? di?cr?dit th? d?f?ndant a? a witn??? t? t??tify f?r ?r again?t a d?f?ndant in an?th?r ca??. Al??, a ?ixth b?n?fit in pl?a bargaining f?r th? ...read more.

Conclusion

ha? th? final w?rd. If th? judg? d??? n?t appr?v? th? pl?a bargain, th? d?f?ndant'? ca?? w?uld th?n g? t? trail, and h?/?h? w?uld hav? a l?ng ?tr???ful pr?c??? ah?ad ?f him/h?r, and ?h?uld d?finit?ly l??k int? hiring a lawy?r. An?th?r di?advantag? t? pl?a bargaining f?r th? d?f?ndant i? that aft?r h?/?h? ?ign? an agr??m?nt t? th? pl?a bargain and agr??? t? pl?ad guilty, h?/?h? th?n l???? hi?/h?r ?pp?rtunity f?r an app?al at a lat?r dat?. ??, if th? d?f?ndant d??? n?t lik? th? final ??nt?nc? carri?d ?ut by th? judg?, h?/?h? i? ?tuck. Al??, ?n? la?t di?advantag? t? pl?a bargain? i? t? th? victim? ?r t? th? famili?? ?f th? victim?. Wh?n a pl?a bargain i? tak?n, th? d?f?ndant typically will b? ??nt?nc?d t? littl? ?r n? jail tim?, l?aving th? victim? ?r th? famili?? ?f th? victim? t? f??l lik? ju?tic? ha? n?t b??n ??rv?d. In c?nclu?i?n, I d? n?t b?li?v? that th? natur? ?f th? crim? ?h?uld hav? an aff?ct ?n th? d?f?ndant'? ?pp?rtunity t? pl?a bargain. ?v?n th?ugh th?r? ar? ??m? di?advantag??, th?r? ar? far m?r? advantag?? and th? advantag?? d?finit?ly ?ut w?igh th? di?advantag??. A pl?a bargain i? alway? pr?par?d in acc?rdanc? t? th? natur? and t?rm? ?f th? crim? c?mmitt?d. A? ?tat?d b?f?r?, th?r? ar? far t?? many b?n?fit? t? pl?a bargaining n?t ?nly t? th? d?f?ndant but al?? t? th? judg? and pr???cut?r? a? w?ll. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    Therefore, judgment was entered for the buyers. * The above case is concerning about the affect on the agreement upon submission of a document containing terms before the alleged contract is made, however if the situation is another way round, the contract will not be effected20 unless they are in

  2. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    These contained 4000 words in 27 paragraphs of small print. (b) Construction. Establishing that the clause has been incorporated into the contract is the first step. It is then necessary to show that the clause covers the breach in question.

  1. In advising Bennys position of the interest over the said property (the flat), it ...

    from their canal for his steam engines and observing the acquiescence (in other words, passive representation) of the canal company when he was laying the pipes for that purpose. The court held that the canal company were not entitled to an injunction restraining the representee from drawing water.

  2. I have been asked to advise a client on considering contracting with a building ...

    The commission was payable on hire. (Taken from Common Law 1 BPP) Liverpool Corporation V Irwin 1976 "The condition of a council tower block deteriorated: there were defects in the stairs and lifts and internal rubbish chutes became blocked. The Irwins alleged a breach on the part of the council of its implied covenant for their quiet enjoyment of the property."

  1. LAW OF CONTRACT. LAW 103. THE CONTENT OF THE CONTRACT.

    This was found to be a breach that did go to the root of the contract. The producers were therefore able to repudiate the contract. However the singer in Bettini had missed only a few days of rehearsals. This was not a breach that went to the root of the

  2. Case Analysis: Christine Brooks v. Cooke County Hospital District

    reporting illegal activity, (3) exercising legal rights, and (4) performing public duties.2 Brooks could claim a breach of contract against CCHD. In order to substantiate her claim Brooks will need to provide evidence for the following: o A legally enforceable contract existed between her and CCHD, and o Some terms of the contract had been breached.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work