• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Plea Bargains

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Plea Bargains [Name of the writer] [Name of the institution] Plea Bargains L?t u? b?gin by d?fining pl?a bargaining. Pl?a bargaining i? an ??ttl?m?nt b?tw??n th? d?f?ndant and th? pr???cut?r, and p?rmitt?d by th? c?urt judg?, in which th? d?f?ndant pl?ad? guilty ?r n? c?nt??t in ?rd?r t? hav? charg?? dr?pp?d, d?cr?a??d t? a crim? ?f l??? ??v?rity, ?r th? ??nt?nc? d?cr?a??d a? b??t a? th? thr?? ?id?? can b? in agr??m?nt up?n. Th?r? ar? f?ur diff?r?nt typ?? ?f pl?a bargain?: (1.) Charg? Bargaining, which i? wh?n th? d?f?ndant pl?ad? guilty t? a l??? ??v?r? crim? than initially ?nf?rc?d; (2.) C?urt Bargaining, which i? wh?n th? d?f?ndant pl?ad? guilty t? a ?mall?r numb?r ?f charg?; (3.) ??nt?nc? Bargaining, which i? wh?n th? d?f?ndant pl?ad? guilty und?r?tanding what th? judgm?nt t? b? giv?n will b?; (4.) Fact Bargaining, which i? wh?n th? d?f?ndant c?nf????? t? ?p?cific fact?, in ?xchang? f?r a d?al fr?m th? pr???cuti?n t? n?t pr???nt ?th?r ?p?cific fact? int? ?vid?nc?. My an?w?r a? t? wh?th?r ?r n?t th? natur? ?f a crim? ?h?uld aff?ct a d?f?ndant'? ?pp?rtunity t? pl?a bargain i?, n?, it ?h?uld n?t R?gardl??? ?f th? natur? ?f th? crim? ?ach and ?v?ry d?f?ndant ha? right? and d???rv?? a fair chanc?. Wh?th?r ?r n?t th? d?f?ndant tak?? th? ...read more.

Middle

t? i??u? at hand. Taking a ca?? t? trial can b?, and in m??t ca??? i?, a v?ry l?ngthy and ?tr???ful pr?c???. Taking th? ?ff?r?d pl?a bargain can r???lv? th? matt?r much m?r? quickly and l??? ?tr???fully. F?urth, pl?a bargaining c?uld al?? b?n?fit th? d?f?ndant by r??ulting in him/h?r having f?w?r ?r ?v?n l??? ??v?r? ?ff?n??? ?n hi?/h?r p?rman?nt r?c?rd. If th? d?f?ndant w?r? t? pl?ad guilty, ?r n? c?nt??t, in ?xchang? f?r a l??? ??v?r? charg?, ?r ?v?n a l?w?r ??nt?nc?, it w?uld l??k ?ignificantly b?tt?r ?n hi?/h?r p?rman?nt r?c?rd than any p???ibl? c?nvicti?n? r??ulting fr?m a trail. F?r ?xampl?, if a d?f?ndant ha? b??n charg?d with driving und?r th? influ?nc?, and h?/?h? t??k a pl?a bargain t? l?w?r th? charg? t? r?ckl??? driving, any futur? ??c?nd ?ff?n?? f?r driving und?r th? influ?nc? might n?t b? inv?lv? any jail tim? in th? ??nt?ncing. A fifth b?n?fit t? pl?a bargaining f?r th? d?f?ndant i? th? p???ibl? ability t? maintain c?rtain privil?g? lic?n??? ?r right?, Lik? th? right t? v?t? ?r ?wn a fir?arm, f?r in?tanc?. B?ing c?nvict?d ?f a f?l?ny r?v?k?? th??? privil?g?d right?. Al??, a f?l?ny c?nvicti?n c?uld b? u??d t? di?cr?dit th? d?f?ndant a? a witn??? t? t??tify f?r ?r again?t a d?f?ndant in an?th?r ca??. Al??, a ?ixth b?n?fit in pl?a bargaining f?r th? ...read more.

Conclusion

ha? th? final w?rd. If th? judg? d??? n?t appr?v? th? pl?a bargain, th? d?f?ndant'? ca?? w?uld th?n g? t? trail, and h?/?h? w?uld hav? a l?ng ?tr???ful pr?c??? ah?ad ?f him/h?r, and ?h?uld d?finit?ly l??k int? hiring a lawy?r. An?th?r di?advantag? t? pl?a bargaining f?r th? d?f?ndant i? that aft?r h?/?h? ?ign? an agr??m?nt t? th? pl?a bargain and agr??? t? pl?ad guilty, h?/?h? th?n l???? hi?/h?r ?pp?rtunity f?r an app?al at a lat?r dat?. ??, if th? d?f?ndant d??? n?t lik? th? final ??nt?nc? carri?d ?ut by th? judg?, h?/?h? i? ?tuck. Al??, ?n? la?t di?advantag? t? pl?a bargain? i? t? th? victim? ?r t? th? famili?? ?f th? victim?. Wh?n a pl?a bargain i? tak?n, th? d?f?ndant typically will b? ??nt?nc?d t? littl? ?r n? jail tim?, l?aving th? victim? ?r th? famili?? ?f th? victim? t? f??l lik? ju?tic? ha? n?t b??n ??rv?d. In c?nclu?i?n, I d? n?t b?li?v? that th? natur? ?f th? crim? ?h?uld hav? an aff?ct ?n th? d?f?ndant'? ?pp?rtunity t? pl?a bargain. ?v?n th?ugh th?r? ar? ??m? di?advantag??, th?r? ar? far m?r? advantag?? and th? advantag?? d?finit?ly ?ut w?igh th? di?advantag??. A pl?a bargain i? alway? pr?par?d in acc?rdanc? t? th? natur? and t?rm? ?f th? crim? c?mmitt?d. A? ?tat?d b?f?r?, th?r? ar? far t?? many b?n?fit? t? pl?a bargaining n?t ?nly t? th? d?f?ndant but al?? t? th? judg? and pr???cut?r? a? w?ll. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    These contained 4000 words in 27 paragraphs of small print. (b) Construction. Establishing that the clause has been incorporated into the contract is the first step. It is then necessary to show that the clause covers the breach in question.

  2. I have been asked to advise a client on considering contracting with a building ...

    to rely on fundamental breach of contract to invalidate an exemption clause. In the case of Chapelton v Barry UDC 1940 it was held that the exemption clause on the back of a receipt was not adequately communicated. Chapelton V Barry UDC 1940 "There was a pile of deck chairs and a notice stating 'hire of chairs 2d (1p)

  1. LAW OF CONTRACT. LAW 103. THE CONTENT OF THE CONTRACT.

    The fact that a particular construction leads to a very unreasonable result must be a relevant consideration. The more unreasonable the result the more unlikely it is that the parties can have intended it, and if they do intend it the more necessary it is that they shall make that intention abundantly clear."

  2. In advising Bennys position of the interest over the said property (the flat), it ...

    Without express common intention, the courts have been engaged into a creative assessment of the party's desire, especially no clear evidence. It is inferred from given facts that Amy did not intend or had ever told Benny to make such assurance to hold "the flat" in their joint names as co-owned by them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work