• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Plea Bargains

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Plea Bargains [Name of the writer] [Name of the institution] Plea Bargains L?t u? b?gin by d?fining pl?a bargaining. Pl?a bargaining i? an ??ttl?m?nt b?tw??n th? d?f?ndant and th? pr???cut?r, and p?rmitt?d by th? c?urt judg?, in which th? d?f?ndant pl?ad? guilty ?r n? c?nt??t in ?rd?r t? hav? charg?? dr?pp?d, d?cr?a??d t? a crim? ?f l??? ??v?rity, ?r th? ??nt?nc? d?cr?a??d a? b??t a? th? thr?? ?id?? can b? in agr??m?nt up?n. Th?r? ar? f?ur diff?r?nt typ?? ?f pl?a bargain?: (1.) Charg? Bargaining, which i? wh?n th? d?f?ndant pl?ad? guilty t? a l??? ??v?r? crim? than initially ?nf?rc?d; (2.) C?urt Bargaining, which i? wh?n th? d?f?ndant pl?ad? guilty t? a ?mall?r numb?r ?f charg?; (3.) ??nt?nc? Bargaining, which i? wh?n th? d?f?ndant pl?ad? guilty und?r?tanding what th? judgm?nt t? b? giv?n will b?; (4.) Fact Bargaining, which i? wh?n th? d?f?ndant c?nf????? t? ?p?cific fact?, in ?xchang? f?r a d?al fr?m th? pr???cuti?n t? n?t pr???nt ?th?r ?p?cific fact? int? ?vid?nc?. My an?w?r a? t? wh?th?r ?r n?t th? natur? ?f a crim? ?h?uld aff?ct a d?f?ndant'? ?pp?rtunity t? pl?a bargain i?, n?, it ?h?uld n?t R?gardl??? ?f th? natur? ?f th? crim? ?ach and ?v?ry d?f?ndant ha? right? and d???rv?? a fair chanc?. Wh?th?r ?r n?t th? d?f?ndant tak?? th? ...read more.

Middle

t? i??u? at hand. Taking a ca?? t? trial can b?, and in m??t ca??? i?, a v?ry l?ngthy and ?tr???ful pr?c???. Taking th? ?ff?r?d pl?a bargain can r???lv? th? matt?r much m?r? quickly and l??? ?tr???fully. F?urth, pl?a bargaining c?uld al?? b?n?fit th? d?f?ndant by r??ulting in him/h?r having f?w?r ?r ?v?n l??? ??v?r? ?ff?n??? ?n hi?/h?r p?rman?nt r?c?rd. If th? d?f?ndant w?r? t? pl?ad guilty, ?r n? c?nt??t, in ?xchang? f?r a l??? ??v?r? charg?, ?r ?v?n a l?w?r ??nt?nc?, it w?uld l??k ?ignificantly b?tt?r ?n hi?/h?r p?rman?nt r?c?rd than any p???ibl? c?nvicti?n? r??ulting fr?m a trail. F?r ?xampl?, if a d?f?ndant ha? b??n charg?d with driving und?r th? influ?nc?, and h?/?h? t??k a pl?a bargain t? l?w?r th? charg? t? r?ckl??? driving, any futur? ??c?nd ?ff?n?? f?r driving und?r th? influ?nc? might n?t b? inv?lv? any jail tim? in th? ??nt?ncing. A fifth b?n?fit t? pl?a bargaining f?r th? d?f?ndant i? th? p???ibl? ability t? maintain c?rtain privil?g? lic?n??? ?r right?, Lik? th? right t? v?t? ?r ?wn a fir?arm, f?r in?tanc?. B?ing c?nvict?d ?f a f?l?ny r?v?k?? th??? privil?g?d right?. Al??, a f?l?ny c?nvicti?n c?uld b? u??d t? di?cr?dit th? d?f?ndant a? a witn??? t? t??tify f?r ?r again?t a d?f?ndant in an?th?r ca??. Al??, a ?ixth b?n?fit in pl?a bargaining f?r th? ...read more.

Conclusion

ha? th? final w?rd. If th? judg? d??? n?t appr?v? th? pl?a bargain, th? d?f?ndant'? ca?? w?uld th?n g? t? trail, and h?/?h? w?uld hav? a l?ng ?tr???ful pr?c??? ah?ad ?f him/h?r, and ?h?uld d?finit?ly l??k int? hiring a lawy?r. An?th?r di?advantag? t? pl?a bargaining f?r th? d?f?ndant i? that aft?r h?/?h? ?ign? an agr??m?nt t? th? pl?a bargain and agr??? t? pl?ad guilty, h?/?h? th?n l???? hi?/h?r ?pp?rtunity f?r an app?al at a lat?r dat?. ??, if th? d?f?ndant d??? n?t lik? th? final ??nt?nc? carri?d ?ut by th? judg?, h?/?h? i? ?tuck. Al??, ?n? la?t di?advantag? t? pl?a bargain? i? t? th? victim? ?r t? th? famili?? ?f th? victim?. Wh?n a pl?a bargain i? tak?n, th? d?f?ndant typically will b? ??nt?nc?d t? littl? ?r n? jail tim?, l?aving th? victim? ?r th? famili?? ?f th? victim? t? f??l lik? ju?tic? ha? n?t b??n ??rv?d. In c?nclu?i?n, I d? n?t b?li?v? that th? natur? ?f th? crim? ?h?uld hav? an aff?ct ?n th? d?f?ndant'? ?pp?rtunity t? pl?a bargain. ?v?n th?ugh th?r? ar? ??m? di?advantag??, th?r? ar? far m?r? advantag?? and th? advantag?? d?finit?ly ?ut w?igh th? di?advantag??. A pl?a bargain i? alway? pr?par?d in acc?rdanc? t? th? natur? and t?rm? ?f th? crim? c?mmitt?d. A? ?tat?d b?f?r?, th?r? ar? far t?? many b?n?fit? t? pl?a bargaining n?t ?nly t? th? d?f?ndant but al?? t? th? judg? and pr???cut?r? a? w?ll. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    tender submitted for the construction of building - acceptance creates binding contract unless expressly stipulated that there will be no contract until certain formal document have been executed 2) Tender made for indefinite amount, acceptance of it just formed a 'standing offer' which will turn to separate contract each time an order is placed.

  2. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    These contained 4000 words in 27 paragraphs of small print. (b) Construction. Establishing that the clause has been incorporated into the contract is the first step. It is then necessary to show that the clause covers the breach in question.

  1. I have been asked to advise a client on considering contracting with a building ...

    For example a customer has to accept his supply of electricity on the electricity boards term; individuals cannot negotiate discounts. One of the main problems with standard form contracts is when the dominant party tries to exclude liability for the terms in the contract, but legislation protecting consumers in such situations is the Unfair Contract Terms Act.

  2. LAW OF CONTRACT. LAW 103. THE CONTENT OF THE CONTRACT.

    which goes to the root of the contract, so that it is clear that the parties contemplate that any breach of it entitles the other party to treat the contract as at an end. Where the parties have not made a particular stipulation a condition it would be unsound and

  1. In advising Bennys position of the interest over the said property (the flat), it ...

    kept clearly in mind the distinction between the effect of evidence on the one hand which was capable of establishing an express agreement....and evidence on the other hand of conduct alone as a basis for an inference of the necessary common intention."

  2. Case Analysis: Christine Brooks v. Cooke County Hospital District

    reporting illegal activity, (3) exercising legal rights, and (4) performing public duties.2 Brooks could claim a breach of contract against CCHD. In order to substantiate her claim Brooks will need to provide evidence for the following: o A legally enforceable contract existed between her and CCHD, and o Some terms of the contract had been breached.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work