• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Plea Bargains

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Plea Bargains [Name of the writer] [Name of the institution] Plea Bargains L?t u? b?gin by d?fining pl?a bargaining. Pl?a bargaining i? an ??ttl?m?nt b?tw??n th? d?f?ndant and th? pr???cut?r, and p?rmitt?d by th? c?urt judg?, in which th? d?f?ndant pl?ad? guilty ?r n? c?nt??t in ?rd?r t? hav? charg?? dr?pp?d, d?cr?a??d t? a crim? ?f l??? ??v?rity, ?r th? ??nt?nc? d?cr?a??d a? b??t a? th? thr?? ?id?? can b? in agr??m?nt up?n. Th?r? ar? f?ur diff?r?nt typ?? ?f pl?a bargain?: (1.) Charg? Bargaining, which i? wh?n th? d?f?ndant pl?ad? guilty t? a l??? ??v?r? crim? than initially ?nf?rc?d; (2.) C?urt Bargaining, which i? wh?n th? d?f?ndant pl?ad? guilty t? a ?mall?r numb?r ?f charg?; (3.) ??nt?nc? Bargaining, which i? wh?n th? d?f?ndant pl?ad? guilty und?r?tanding what th? judgm?nt t? b? giv?n will b?; (4.) Fact Bargaining, which i? wh?n th? d?f?ndant c?nf????? t? ?p?cific fact?, in ?xchang? f?r a d?al fr?m th? pr???cuti?n t? n?t pr???nt ?th?r ?p?cific fact? int? ?vid?nc?. My an?w?r a? t? wh?th?r ?r n?t th? natur? ?f a crim? ?h?uld aff?ct a d?f?ndant'? ?pp?rtunity t? pl?a bargain i?, n?, it ?h?uld n?t R?gardl??? ?f th? natur? ?f th? crim? ?ach and ?v?ry d?f?ndant ha? right? and d???rv?? a fair chanc?. Wh?th?r ?r n?t th? d?f?ndant tak?? th? ...read more.

Middle

t? i??u? at hand. Taking a ca?? t? trial can b?, and in m??t ca??? i?, a v?ry l?ngthy and ?tr???ful pr?c???. Taking th? ?ff?r?d pl?a bargain can r???lv? th? matt?r much m?r? quickly and l??? ?tr???fully. F?urth, pl?a bargaining c?uld al?? b?n?fit th? d?f?ndant by r??ulting in him/h?r having f?w?r ?r ?v?n l??? ??v?r? ?ff?n??? ?n hi?/h?r p?rman?nt r?c?rd. If th? d?f?ndant w?r? t? pl?ad guilty, ?r n? c?nt??t, in ?xchang? f?r a l??? ??v?r? charg?, ?r ?v?n a l?w?r ??nt?nc?, it w?uld l??k ?ignificantly b?tt?r ?n hi?/h?r p?rman?nt r?c?rd than any p???ibl? c?nvicti?n? r??ulting fr?m a trail. F?r ?xampl?, if a d?f?ndant ha? b??n charg?d with driving und?r th? influ?nc?, and h?/?h? t??k a pl?a bargain t? l?w?r th? charg? t? r?ckl??? driving, any futur? ??c?nd ?ff?n?? f?r driving und?r th? influ?nc? might n?t b? inv?lv? any jail tim? in th? ??nt?ncing. A fifth b?n?fit t? pl?a bargaining f?r th? d?f?ndant i? th? p???ibl? ability t? maintain c?rtain privil?g? lic?n??? ?r right?, Lik? th? right t? v?t? ?r ?wn a fir?arm, f?r in?tanc?. B?ing c?nvict?d ?f a f?l?ny r?v?k?? th??? privil?g?d right?. Al??, a f?l?ny c?nvicti?n c?uld b? u??d t? di?cr?dit th? d?f?ndant a? a witn??? t? t??tify f?r ?r again?t a d?f?ndant in an?th?r ca??. Al??, a ?ixth b?n?fit in pl?a bargaining f?r th? ...read more.

Conclusion

ha? th? final w?rd. If th? judg? d??? n?t appr?v? th? pl?a bargain, th? d?f?ndant'? ca?? w?uld th?n g? t? trail, and h?/?h? w?uld hav? a l?ng ?tr???ful pr?c??? ah?ad ?f him/h?r, and ?h?uld d?finit?ly l??k int? hiring a lawy?r. An?th?r di?advantag? t? pl?a bargaining f?r th? d?f?ndant i? that aft?r h?/?h? ?ign? an agr??m?nt t? th? pl?a bargain and agr??? t? pl?ad guilty, h?/?h? th?n l???? hi?/h?r ?pp?rtunity f?r an app?al at a lat?r dat?. ??, if th? d?f?ndant d??? n?t lik? th? final ??nt?nc? carri?d ?ut by th? judg?, h?/?h? i? ?tuck. Al??, ?n? la?t di?advantag? t? pl?a bargain? i? t? th? victim? ?r t? th? famili?? ?f th? victim?. Wh?n a pl?a bargain i? tak?n, th? d?f?ndant typically will b? ??nt?nc?d t? littl? ?r n? jail tim?, l?aving th? victim? ?r th? famili?? ?f th? victim? t? f??l lik? ju?tic? ha? n?t b??n ??rv?d. In c?nclu?i?n, I d? n?t b?li?v? that th? natur? ?f th? crim? ?h?uld hav? an aff?ct ?n th? d?f?ndant'? ?pp?rtunity t? pl?a bargain. ?v?n th?ugh th?r? ar? ??m? di?advantag??, th?r? ar? far m?r? advantag?? and th? advantag?? d?finit?ly ?ut w?igh th? di?advantag??. A pl?a bargain i? alway? pr?par?d in acc?rdanc? t? th? natur? and t?rm? ?f th? crim? c?mmitt?d. A? ?tat?d b?f?r?, th?r? ar? far t?? many b?n?fit? t? pl?a bargaining n?t ?nly t? th? d?f?ndant but al?? t? th? judg? and pr???cut?r? a? w?ll. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    The courts have to determine its proper construction. The principles of interpretation of contracts are set out in Investors Compensation Scheme v West Bromich Building Soc [1998] 1WLR 896, 912. Interpretation is ascertaining the meaning the document would convey to a reasonable person having all the background knowledge which would

  2. I have been asked to advise a client on considering contracting with a building ...

    The commission was payable on hire. (Taken from Common Law 1 BPP) Liverpool Corporation V Irwin 1976 "The condition of a council tower block deteriorated: there were defects in the stairs and lifts and internal rubbish chutes became blocked. The Irwins alleged a breach on the part of the council of its implied covenant for their quiet enjoyment of the property."

  1. Case Analysis: Christine Brooks v. Cooke County Hospital District

    CCHD's personnel policy manual stated the following related to terminations: "Employment at the hospital is by mutual agreement and may be terminated by either the employee or the employer. All employee records will indicate the nature of termination which will be one of the following: (1) resignation, (2) quitting (3)

  2. In advising Bennys position of the interest over the said property (the flat), it ...

    doing housework or staying at home to look after children to give up employment. Nevertheless, he still requires in satisfaction of the following conditions/requirements as: 1. A very clear evidential burden requires establishing an express common intention that is expressly articulated between the parties to share the ownership of property13.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work