• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Postal Acceptance Rule

Extracts from this document...


Postal Acceptance Rule Contract is formed at the time and place an acceptance is communicated to the offeror. An acceptance must correspond to the offer. There is no particular method of acceptance prescribed by law. The appropriate method of acceptance will depend on the fact of each situation. The offerees may find themselves faced with two types of situation. First the offer may dictate a method of acceptance. It may indicate that acceptance should be sent by return fax by a certain date. The second broad category is where there is no indication in the offer of an appropriate method of acceptance. The general rule followed by offeree is that acceptance may be given by the same or an equally expedient method as adopted for the making of the offer. Hence it follows that until the acceptance is received by the offeror the offer may be revoked. In the late 19th century an exception to the general agreement for communication of an acceptance arose in order to avoid the extraordinary and mischievous consequences that would follow if it might be held that the offer might be revoked at any time until the letter accepting it had actually been received. ...read more.


The courts were compelled to examine further policy considerations in order to determine whether the postal acceptance rule should be retained. The courts formed the view that the postal acceptance rule could be justified on the grounds of agency. It was argued that the post office was the agent of the offeror and offeree and that consequently acceptance must be viewed as complete upon delivery to the post office. The argument was that the reason is not satisfactory. "The post offices are only carriers between them. They are agents to convey the communication, not to receive it. The difference is between saying ' Tell my agent A, if you accept' and 'Send your answer to me by A.' In the former case A is to be intelligent recipient of the acceptance, in the latter he is only to convey the communication to the person making the offer which he may do by letter, knowing nothing of its contents. The post office are only agents in the latter sense. The most persuasive reason for wholly rejecting the justification based on agency has been stated by Simon Gardner, who argues that an offeror's agreement to use the post as a means of communicational acceptance "surely does not establish agency. ...read more.


Contract is formed at the moment acceptance takes place. The mistake on the part of mutual agent falls equally upon the shoulders of both and this causes inconvenience or hardship. However this can be counter argued. If an offeror choses he can always make the formation of the contract, however he proposes absolute formation of contract upon actual communication to himself of the acceptance. If the offeror does not receive any reply from the offeree he can always make inquiries to the offeree about the offer. If the contract is not concluded there would be considerable delay in transactions and the acceptor would never be safe until he has received notice that his letter of acceptance had reached its destination. (Source: Kathryn O' Shea and Kylie Skeahan (1997) "Acceptance of offers by E-mail - How Far should the postal Acceptance Rule Extend? " QUT Law Journal, Vol 13, pp 247-262). The nature of postal acceptance rule denotes a separation of parties by time and distance. If each party felt that they were not bound by their assent to contractual terms until they received confirmation of the other's receipt then the situation ' might go on ad infinitum'. Hence no contract would ever be completed by post unless a legal ruling was made on the matter. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Acceptance.

    4 star(s)

    CASE: Luxor (Eastbourne) Ltd v Cooper (1941) - an owned of land had promised to pay an estate agent �10,000 in commission if the agent was able to find a buyer willing to pay �17,500 for the land. The arrangement was on the terms that are usual between an estate

  2. Marked by a teacher

    "The requirement of consideration is an unnecessary complication in the formation of contracts."

    4 star(s)

    Even if the consideration does actually constitute a practical benefit, the courts were not willing to accept this line of argument. However, in later cases it is decided otherwise, such as the case of Ward v Byham [1956]. The claimant was legally compelled by s 42 of the National Assistance

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    unilateral contract, in addition there is no further bargaining4 * However for bilateral contract, it is not offer as there is further bargaining of assuring himself that the other party is able to perform his part of the contract5 * Advertisement for auction6, advertisement for scholarship exam7, circulation of price-list

  2. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    This would have been difficult and complicated without certainty of success. British Westinghouse v Underground Electric Railways [1912] AC 673. British Westinghouse supplied turbines to the railway company. They were deficient in power and uneconomic. The railway company replaced the turbines with a different make.

  1. Outline the basic rule of the law of contract regarding the effective revocation of ...

    adds: "I suppose there is no chance of moving it on the Saturday instead?" Jane only reads the e-mail after leaving a recorded message on Louise's answering machine in which she withdraws her offer. First, this is not a counter-offer Hyde v Wrench but a request for further information.

  2. I have been asked to advise a client on considering contracting with a building ...

    Offeror and offeree An offeror is the negotiating because he controls the terms and conditions of the offer i.e. he controls the price and how long the offer stands. An offeree is the person who is prepared to accept the offer.


    Rule of thumb for one wishing to enforce a Restrictive covenant is not to put unruly excessive terms and to do no more than necessary to protect legitimate business interests but Scottish courts will determine what is reasonable. If worthy then court will issue an interdict to prevent employment in

  2. Aspects of the law affecting construction projects.

    on fact or law, but usually appeal is only allowed on matters of legal importance Task 2 Delegated legislation ? legislation are rules of law created and enacted by Parliament which acknowledges that it does not have time or expertise to deal with all legislation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work