• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Principles on which sentencing decisions are based

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Sentencing: Principles on which sentencing decisions are based have to be considered in the light of the available penalties which a criminal court may impose on a defendant. Whatever principles there are will be reflected in the types of sentence available and the way in which the courts choose between alternative penalties. The valuable penalties are first of all determined by the offence for which the defendant has been convicted: many minor offences for example will be punishable only by way of fine. In addition if the matter is disposed of in the Magistrates' Court or Youth Court (for juveniles) there are additional restrictions on the powers of sentence. Generally no custodial term may exceed six months (12 months exceptionally where more than one offence is involved) nor may any fine exceed five thousand pounds. However, in these cases if the offence is 'triable either way' the magistrates may commit the offender to the Crown Court for sentence only where the Crown Court has powers to impose any sentence permitted by the offence (although in the case of juveniles, except in very restricted cases, any custodial term must not exceed one year). The courts broadly have a choice between a discharge (conditional or absolute), fine, community sentence (there are six type of community sentence: probation order, community service order, combination order, curfew order, attendance ...read more.

Middle

them could be regarded as an aggravating feature of an offence which made it more serious, thus justifying a higher sentence on a desert-based approach. The CJA - 1991 restricts the use of custody (both for juveniles and adults) to three circumstances (s1 of CJA - 1991): first, where the offence is so serious that only imprisonment can be justified; secondly, where the offence is a violent or sex offence and imprisonment is necessary to protect the public from serious harm and finally, where an offender has refused to consent to a community sentence. Thus, imprisonment in the case of a non-violent or sex offence cannot be justified on the basis of public protection or exemplary deterrent, only on the basis of giving the offender what he deserves for that offence. This new approach was aggravated by provisions since repealed by the CJA - 1993 which restricted the courts ability to take into account previous convictions in considering the seriousness of the offence. Previous convictions may now be regarded as features which make the offence more serious. The length of imprisonment should reflect the seriousness of the offence (s2 of CJA - 1991) and in the case of violent or sex offences such longer period as is necessary to protect the public. Similarly both community sentence and fines (s18 of the CJA 1991 as amended) ...read more.

Conclusion

These might include co-operation with the police or guilty plea on the one hand or pre-meditation or the use of violence or a weapon on the other. The guilty plea has taken on a new significance since the introduction of s48 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act - 1994. This requires a sentencing court to take into account, when a guilty plea is entered, the stage and circumstances in which the guilty plea was indicated by the accused. This reflects the policy of rewarding offenders who save court time and spare the worry of the victim. The earlier guilt is indicated, the greater may be the sentence reduction. A guilty plea but without acceptance of the prosecution's version of facts might lose some, or all, credit if a 'Newton hearing' is forced. [A Newton hearing is held when the facts on which a guilty plea were based are in dispute; for example, the extent of damage or injury might be disputed] The principles used in setting appropriate sentences for individuals are wide ranging. Whilst desert appears to have been crucial under the CJA - 1991, along with a greater range of more flexible rehabilitative sentences particularly for juveniles, it seems likely that incapacitation and deterrence are likely to be given greater prominence in the government's forthcoming legislation on criminal justice. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Briefly outline the various sentencing options available to the courts for both over and ...

    4 star(s)

    Where the failure to properly maintain and service the railway tracks led to the deaths of 4 and the injuring of many more passengers. Balfour Beatty was fined a record �10 million. Advantages of fines are that it provides alternate income for the justice system and due to human nature towards money, it provides for an excellent deterrent.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Non-fatal Offences?

    3 star(s)

    Thus the Law Commission and the Criminal Law Revision Committee have put forward various reforms, which could improve the current law legally as well as morally. For example the first aspect which will be addressed is that of the language used, serious would be used instead of grievous and words such as maliciously, wounding etc will be avoided altogether.

  1. Critically evaluate the aims and consequences of sentencing and show how the laws regarding ...

    However, sometimes a crime is so serious that even the mitigating factors of youth and previous good behaviour are not enough, whereby victims of theft are targeted, purely because of their old age, shown in Richards (1989) 11 Cr App R (S) 286. Nawrot (1988) 10 Cr App R (S)

  2. The Death Penalty in Canada. There are many issues surrounding the rebirth of ...

    Currently, the amount of murders seen in Canada is about a third of that seen in the U.Svi. Perhaps this is proof enough for those 43% of Canadians who do not support the reinstatement of capital punishment, because if something is not broken why fix it?

  1. I will look at different black theologies and different theories of justice, and attempt ...

    two basic conditions which characterise man in his natural state5: continual fear (thus the life of man is solitary, poor, nasty and short) and contention, enmity and war. Given this gloomy picture of humanity, a "social contract" can lead to a tolerable existence.

  2. The rich get richer and the poor get prison

    In the chapter, "A Crime by Any Other Name . . . ," Reiman considers how language is used to identify some actions, and he argues that such things as workplace-related deaths that could be prevented should be considered crimes, as well.

  1. Expert Testimony and Its Value In the Justice System

    run is the minimum level to which concurrent evidence should be applied. Conclusion It is obvious that the laws regarding expert testimony in the United Kingdom are in desperate need of reform. This is clearly highlighted by the high profile miscarriages of justice which have happened over the past decade

  2. Arguing in Favour of the Death Penalty

    of many things but must show the crime was especially heinous, cruel or depraved or the murder of a police officer (Gutierrez). The government and the judicial system has now become so bogged down and overcrowded that the thought of going to jail is like a joke, people know that

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work