• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Problems of Knowledge with the PATRIOT Act.

Extracts from this document...


Problems of Knowledge with the PATRIOT Act What is the PATRIOT Act? � After the attack of September 11, 2001, Congress in its wisdom determined the need to revise and create laws that better enable law enforcement to track and intercept communications of those who would do America harm (namely, the PATRIOT Act) What is the USA PATRIOT Act: � USA Patriot is an acronym for "Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism" What the PATRIOT Act Does: � It breaks the political backs of the judiciary and legislative branches of government. � It allows random arrests and detention without hearings or trials for anyone or any group designated by the President. Retroactive Prosecution, too! � It allows the concealment of Presidential records. � It permits secret "Military Tribunals" for presidential-designated "terrorists". � It legalizes "sneak-n-peek" searches and seizures. � It allows the unlawful infiltration and surveillance of legal, domestic religious, labor and political organizations. � It allows the wholesale surveillance of private citizens, private business records and other materials without proof of probable cause. ...read more.


This example of confusion is a prime limitation to knowledge. - However, the opposition counters that laws involving such complicated issues naturally become complicated, as this law pertains to many different laws passed earlier in the US. Vagueness leads to POWER Abuse? � Some opponents of the PATRIOT Act argue: � "Hypothetically it is plausible that through the Patriot Act, those who are adamant protestors of our current political regime, if they become to powerful and threaten the plans of the government, could be labeled as enemy combatants against America. There is no language in the Patriot Act that would disallow this possibility from happening." - This points out a major POK - the Act's language is too vague, and thus, it may be abused. POK # 3 - Fighting for Your Rights � Both sides argue that they are protecting the rights of the people. - The pro-activists argue that they are defending the securities of the people. - The opposition counters by arguing that the PATRIOT Act takes away the sacred RIGHT to individuality and privacy. � The POK arises when trying to value what is more important. Can we do such a thing? ...read more.


� The USA Patriot Act was passed 6 weeks after 9/11 � The bill, which was proposed just two days after the September 11th attacks, is about 320 pages in length. - It seems that George Bush had plans for this before Sept. 11. The Use of Statistics � The supporters outline that the PATRIOT Act was passed with a clear majority of the congress vote and senate vote - USA Patriot Act, which was passed by a ninety eight to one vote in the Senate and a three hundred and fifty seven to sixty six vote in Congress. � However, the opposition points out that Why is this IMPORTANT? � We all take our freedoms for granted. There have been totalitarian dictatorships that HAVE abused human rights. � I feel that the PATRIOT Act is a step closer to George Orwell's 1984; how can we feel comfortable living and learning in a world where "Big Brother" is watching � We must work towards promoting our rights and freedoms, and defending ourselves from the powers who aim to twist words to get what they want. � "The Patriot Act could usher in the beginning of an age where we have no civil liberties at all." ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Extradition of terrorists

    Offences under the Extradition Act 2003 are found in s64(2) which states that the conduct must have occurred in the country requesting extradition of that person and that the conduct must fall within the European framework list2 in schedule two to the act, and that this conduct must be punishable with imprisonment or other detention.


    McCullough stated that "the Currency Act confirmed the ratings of the British sovereign and the US$10 gold eagle that had been in place since the establishment of the Province of Canada in 1841. The British gold sovereign was rated at �1 4s.

  1. Who was the more successful president: JFK or LBJ?

    and which also resulted in the assassinations of major leading civil rights campaigners (Martin Luther King, Malcolm X, Robert Kennedy). When one surveys the above detail, LBJ comes out as the clear winner when the criterion is black civil rights.

  2. Should people have a right to privacy?

    Unsurprisingly, the Douglases sought damages from Hello with the claim of breach of privacy and breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 and were successful in the High Court and the Court of Appeal. On the other hand, OK! had the award of damages over turned in the Court of Appeal but chose to appeal to the Lords.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work