• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Public law - Acts of parliament

Extracts from this document...


Public law course work Acts of parliament are considered to be the highest form of law in England. The reason for this is constitutional. Under England's unwritten constitution, parliament is seen as sovereign. As a result, its enacted will, in the form of Acts of parliament, cannot be challenged in the courts. However, in practice there are legal, political and moral limitations on this sovereignty, which will be discussed in some detail in the following pages. An act of parliament is to be always obeyed, even if the act conflicts with common law [Burmah oil Co v Lord Advocate {1965} A.C 75]. Here, the H.L held that where private property was taken or destroyed under the royal prerogative, the owner was entitled at common law to compensation from the crown. However, parliament reversed this decision by enacting the War Damages Act 1965. It provided that no person should be entitled at common law to receive compensation in respect of damage to or destruction of property caused by lawful acts of the crown during the outbreak of a war in which the sovereign is engaged. As a result of this act, Burmah Oil was no longer entitled to compensation, which would have been its common law right. It is now recognised that it is only the Acts of Parliaments that have legal sovereignty. ...read more.


Europe The U.K. became a member of the European Committees on the first of January 1973 by virtue of the treaty of Accession 1972. For the Treaty of Accession and the community treaties and law to have effect in the U.K. parliament passed legislation incorporating them into domestic law by the European Communities Act 1972. As the U.K. has become a member of the European Union, inevitably, situations have arisen when an Act of parliament has conflicted with the European Union. Given the provisions of the European Communities Act 1972, the courts have had to try to resolve these conflicts, constrained by the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty on the one hand and the realities of membership of the European Union on the other. Section 2(4) of the European Communities Act 1972 addresses the issue of conflict between domestic legislation (Acts of Parliament) and European law stating that Acts of parliament shall be construed and have effect subject to directly applicable Community law. Lord Dennings has views on this matter in Bulmer V Bollinger (1974), "When we come to matters with a European elect the Treaty is like an incoming tide. It flows into the Estuaries and up the rivers. It cannot be held back!" Despite Lord Dennings words, there are several possible interpretations of S2 (4) ...read more.


Provided that this delegation is lawful, then the U.K. will remain in compliance with the convention and no public authority will violate the convention rights by enforcing the powers given under the Act, since those rights will have been redefined-& limited- by the derogation. In general, courts try their utmost to reconcile if a conflict arises between Human Right's and Acts of Parliament, but if the conflict still remains, then courts apply the Acts of Parliament and then an issue of incompatibility is declared. The government also has the option to derogate. However, there has been no case where incompatibility has changed the law. There have been cases in which parliament has bowed to pressure to amend the law where there has been a breach of the convention (Campbell and Cosans v U.K. 1982); Malone v U.K. (1985). CONCLUSION In the light of all that has been discussed, I conclude that parliament is supreme. It has the power to pass legislation which conflicts with common law, international treaties etc. but it may not choose to use its power for political, moral considerations and fear of electoral defeat. However, there does seem to be one legal fetter, the European Community. The European Court recognises community law as being supreme (Costa v ENEL{1964}) and that the sovereignty of member states has been limited. But parliament could repeal the European Community Act 1972 which would restore total legislative freedom. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. "The main aims of the Land Registration Acts were to give certainty to title ...

    being disposed or created by registered dispositions and capable of being overridden (whether or not a purchaser has notice thereof) by the proprietors unless protected as provided by this Act, and all rights and interests which are not registered or protected on the register and are not overriding interests, and include...

  2. Commercial law discussion - 'Transfer of Title by a Non-Owner'.

    It was an important part of the Court of Appeal's reasoning that the sale by A to B had taken place in the ordinary course of business of a mercantile agent. So therefore the Bishops case is a similar situation and so there is no reason why the bona fide

  1. Examine the relationship between law and morals and consider whether the law should support ...

    shown in the case of Shaw v DPP, this is where the defendant published a 'ladies directory' which was a list of prostitutes with photos, some of prostitutes and information on the type of sexual behaviour they were prepared to participate.

  2. Discuss whether incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights into the domestic legislation ...

    Although under section 3 (1) it states that all primary and subordinate legislation "so far as possible to do so...must be read and given effect in a away compatible with the Convention rights."17 This is not the only view.

  1. To advise Reggie, it is necessary to look at the law of adverse possession. ...

    or other property to secure the repayment of a debt.43 Where the legal mortgage is of land, it must be by deed.44 An equitable mortgage is one which passes only an equitable estate or interest. Mortgagees can enforce their rights which is the ability to recover their money should the

  2. To what extent do you think these aims have been (or will be) facilitated ...

    the fact of such registration, to all persons and for all purposes connected with the land affected, as from the date of registration or other prescribed date and so long as the registration continues in force. 12 s. 2. LPA 1925 13 This requires registration of a conveyance of a

  1. "In form, the Human Rights Act (HRA) is compatible with parliamentary sovereignty. In practice, ...

    Although the HRA does not empower courts to question the legality of primary legislation, it does offer the opportunity to challenge a statute's legitimacy through section 4's device - the declaration of incompatibility. This novel remedy applies where a court cannot interpret a statutory provision in a way which is compatible with a Convention right.

  2. The most conventional meaning of the 'legislative supremacy of Parliament' was adopted by Dicey

    be amended or repealed, providing the New Parliament finds inconsistencies with the earlier Act. The extent of the amendment or repeal will be stated in the later Act and will take legal effect once the Act or the relevant provision has come into force.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work