• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

R v David Smith. - ABH, criminal law

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

R v David Smith a) The Prosecutors Submission: The Defendant is charged with two cases of assault occasioning Actual Bodily Harm, according to Section 47 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861, arising out of an incident that occurred in Theobald Road, Smallville on the 11th of August 2003. This is an aggravated assault, and the Prosecution must prove an unlawful assault which caused the victim to sustain an injury that is more than merely 'trifling' or 'superficial,' but as long as the injury is 'not so trivial as to be insignificant,' it shall suffice. The defendant has pleaded guilty to both of the charges. In a brief summary of the facts, David Smith was alone in his car on the early morning of the 11th of August 2003. Whilst driving along Lansdowne Road, he turned into Beda Road and upon seeing a marked police traffic patrol vehicle, stuck his fingers out of the window and made an obscene gesture at the Police officer operating the marked vehicle. David Smith then turned into Brunswick Street, driving in the middle of the road, causing a taxi to take evasive action. Mr Smith proceeded to make a number of left and right turns whilst travelling at speeds of up to sixty miles per hour in a thirty miles per hour residential area. Mr Smith got out of his vehicle at the end of Lansdowne Road and ran away from the police car in a Westerly direction. ...read more.

Middle

His previous Actual Bodily Harm Offence highlighted his violent side when he punched a neighbour in the face. In the eyes of the prosecution, this shows that as a repeat offender he must move up the sentencing hierarchy. . b) Mitigating Circumstances: I shall begin as before by looking at the circumstances, then the character and situation of the Defendant. Mr. Smith pleaded guilty to all offences levelled at him, but the punishment dealt seems to outweigh the actions. The struggle with the officers was unsavoury but by no means a pre-meditated attack on another person. As said in the interview, Mr. Smith was purely defending himself as he was pushed to the ground. Mr. Smith was not trying to injure the police officers, but merely escape to carry on the chase. Dr. Hood inspected the police officers an hour later and whilst recognising breaks in the skin, said the injuries were of a superficial nature and of mild force. No further treatment was necessary and this is reinforced by the fact that it took ten minutes to clear both Officers. Mr. Smith deserves an amount of credit for pleading guilty to the attacks and has said that even though he can't recall specifically what happened, he is sorry for the attack on them. He accepts what he did was wrong and knows he should not have raced with the police or initiate a chase on foot. He admits to losing control of himself and is prepared to see someone in order to gain some responsibility. ...read more.

Conclusion

was also given six months in prison for punching and butting an officer. One case which does support Mr. Smith is that of R v Aguilar (1985) where part of a six month sentence was suspended due to the defendant having a job and excellent background, with employers willing to take him back. This will aid Mr. Smith due to the fact he has just found a job after a long period out of work, and although not too similar to R v Aguilar (1985), the employment aspect of suspending a sentence may aid Mr. Smith. The cases above offer guidelines in terms of how Mr. Smith should be dealt with, and the last thing left to consider is his previous sentences and character. Although Mr. Smith has found a job and seems to recognise his problems with responsibility, the punishments of his previous crimes have never really deterred him from re-offending in one way or another, be it the same crime or a new one. His previous conviction for assault occasioning Actual Bodily Harm shows a violent streak and no end of compensations and fines to be paid out have resulted in a halt of such activities. It is obvious that the cases above have all imposed a custodial sentence in light of a section 47 assault on a police officer and Mr. Smith shall be no different. In respect of precedent and with the consideration of all aggravating, mitigating and case law factors, and the totality principle of Mr. Smith having two charges of assault occasioning Actual Bodily Harm, I believe it suitable that Mr. Smith receive a custodial sentence of 6-12 months Word Count: 1,986 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Describe the different aims of sentencing.

    The main aims for this order are retribution, reparation, deterrence, denunciation and incapacitation. A Community Punishment Order is seen as the severest punishment to sentence an offender before a custodial sentence; this is why retribution is a key aim in this sentence which is also indicated in the title of the order.

  2. Why do young people join gangs and other subcultures? How does a criminal sub ...

    The six focal concerns are... * Trouble. They accept that life involves violence and they will not run away from fights. * Toughness. Males ought to demonstrate the qualities of manliness, being able to drink, play sport, etc. * Smartness.

  1. Explain the ranges of sentences available to the judge or magistrate.

    Deterrence is the second main theory of punishment and it aims to reduce crime by the threat or example of punishment. Unlike retributive theories, deterrent theories are forward looking, concerning themselves with the consequence of punishment. Deterrence operates on several levels.

  2. Sentencing is the decision of what penalty should be imposed on a person who ...

    There are four types of community sentence: probation order; community service order; combination order and curfew order. A probation order places the offender under the supervision of a probation officer for a period of three months to three years. If Byron were to be given this sentence, during the time

  1. A rule as to precedent (which any court lays down for itself) is not ...

    Like in R v R, the HOL, used the virtue of the Practice Statement 1966 to overrule the 200 year rule of law that husbands can never be prosecuted for raping their wives. In view of all the discretion available to the courts, the concern swings to the other end of the pendulum.

  2. Microsoft Antitrust Case Microsoft is a large diversified computer software manufacturer. Microsoft produces ...

    On May 18,1998 when the Department of Justice and the Attorneys Generals of 20 States along with the District of Columbia sued Microsoft the main allegations were: 1. Microsoft illegally monopolized the market for operating systems for personal computers under ¶2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act; 2.

  1. Notes on Sentencing in British courts

    o Not used when offence is so serious that an immediate custodial one would have been appropriate. o Can be combined with fines or compensation orders. o Often viewed as soft option by offenders. Many re offend. 3.2 Custodial Sentences for Young Offenders Argued custodial sentences for under 15 is bad, university of crime.

  2. Arguing in Favour of the Death Penalty

    The sentence handed down by the jury or the judge should be followed through completely with no early release for good behavior or parole because one-third of your sentence has been completed. Society has to reach a compromise on what is just and fair and set the laws so that the punishment fits the crime.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work