• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Reforms to criminal justice systems

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Reforms to criminal justice systems The Government published the Auld report on the 8th October 2001. This was a huge report, which basically reviewed the criminal courts system. Sir Robin Auld (a senior Appeal court judge) conducted this review. The review was acknowledged by the government as being a vital contributor towards establishing modern, efficient criminal courts (e.g. fewer delays in them etc.). Auld's key recommendations include: * Unified criminal courts, replacing the Crown and Magistrates courts, and consisting of 3 divisions. The Crown Division (which is effectively the Crown Court as we know it) would exercise jurisdiction over all indictable-only matters and the more serious either-way offences. The District Division, presided over by a District Judge or Recorder and at least 2 magistrates, would exercise jurisdiction over a mid-range of either-way matters of sufficient seriousness to merit up to 2 years custody. The Magistrates Division, constituted by a District Judge or Magistrate, which is more or less the Magistrates Courts as we know them, would deal with all summary matters as presently defined and less serious either-way cases. Controversially, the courts in the Magistrates Division would allocate all either-way cases according to the seriousness of the alleged offence and the circumstances of the defendant. ...read more.

Middle

They will do this by: detecting more crime, getting all defendants to court quickly, prevent affending on bail, to convict more of the guilty, improve trial and keep the dangerous in custody. To detect more crime they decided to increase police numbers, police spending, encourage specialist skills, do more 'front line' work and get better technology for detection. To get more defendants to court more quickly they will allow Crown Prosecution Service to take more responsibility for determining charges so that the right cases go to court on the right charges, invest �600 million to manage cases, give sentence indication (idea- early guilty pleas) and give magistrates greater sentencing powers. To prevent offending on bail they will take into account previous convictions, area where defendant lives and seriousness of offence before granting bail (especially with no conditions on it). To convict more of the guilty they will improve disclosure, allow trial by judge alone (especially where jury can feel intimidated), extend the availability of preparatory hearings to ensure that serious cases like, drug trafficking, can be properly prepared. At the trial they will inform the court of a defendant's previous convictions (where appropriate), remove the double jeopardy rule for serious cases if compelling new evidence comes to light and increase population eligible for jury service. ...read more.

Conclusion

There are to be performance indicators of race equality, reviews by police forces of the racism awareness training every three years, stop and search powers research, recruitment of ethnic minority police officers, the racial discrimination legislation extended into all services and will also make chief police officers liable for racial discrimination by their officers. Police corruption This basically looks at the idea of criminals being able to somehow (usually through money) corrupt a police officer. Sir Paul Condon has made anti-corruption a touchstone of his term as commissioner of the metropolitan police. He estimated that there was up to 250 corrupt officers in his force. Special squads need to be set up, like New Scotland Yard, who concentrate on corrupt police officers, so police officers too can be convicted of corruption-related offences or suspended for alleged corruption or similar matters. A corroboration rule? This is the idea that confession should be backed up with other evidence, as there can be false confessions. McConville said only 8% of persecutions would be affected by automatic acquittals (only in smaller cases) and it would be a small price to pay to avoid further miscarriages of justice. If we look back at the case of Michael Stone in 1998, we can see that confession evidence does not necessarily do justice. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    ‘Trial by jury is outdated, expensive and ineffective in ensuring justice’ Analyse arguments for ...

    4 star(s)

    government, in addition to speeding up the process of justice - something to worry any advocate of due process. Due process seeks to protect the rights of all defendants, whatever they are accused of and regardless of whether or not they are guilty.

  2. Woolf Reforms

    Lord Woolf hoped that the change in language would help to be open and fair according the overriding objective and the new rules. Complexity is also reduced by there being only one set of rules and only one claim form, replacing the writ for the High Court and the summons for the County Court.

  1. The Bail Act 1976 gives a general right to bail, no matter how serious ...

    court fail to do so and nearly 25% of defendants commit an offence whilst on bail. However it is also argued that far too many people are refused bail, i.e. remanded into custody. Around 14,000 people are currently in British prisons awaiting trial, which is about 20% of the prison population.

  2. Critically evaluate the aims and consequences of sentencing and show how the laws regarding ...

    In Ivey (1981) 3 Cr App R (S) 185 Griffiths LJ held that kicking a man on the head whilst on the floor and urinating on him was above and beyond the normal cause of assault. Also in Legge (1988) 10 Cr App R (S)

  1. What Impact will Formalising Plea Bargaining have on Justice and Equality in the English ...

    An article written by Young and Sanders19 deals with some of the arguments in favour of a formalised plea bargaining system. They put forward the suggestion that the Royal Commission's proposals on plea bargaining will have the asset of openly recognising the practice in the legal system.

  2. Free essay

    Critically discuss whether the criminal courts of England and Wales require substantial reform. Firstly ...

    Either way offences are indictable offences which can be tried in the Magistrates Court or Crown Court depending on the nature of seriousness of the case. Examples include theft, assault causing actually bodily harm and counterfeiting offences. All criminal cases start in the magistrates' court.

  1. I will look at different black theologies and different theories of justice, and attempt ...

    justice concurs with Martin Luther King's theology and James Cone's, as they both seek to achieve a sense of black people not being oppressed unfairly. They both seek a redistribution of rights and positions in a white-dominated society. Individualist Theories of Justice Thomas Hobbes, an individualist, thought that there are

  2. Why was the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) created?

    Secondly the prosecution of offender should be independent, impartial and fair and most importantly been seen as being the last three points, along with this criticism they questioned how the police could be involved the investigation and prosecution when the prosecution should only be seeking out the truth and not just be concerned about winning or losing a case.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work