• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Restrictive Covenants

Extracts from this document...


Restrictive Covenants In the situation described in this problem, a restrictive covenant would be the best way to protect the company's interests. Although the implied terms of employee confidentiality regarding company information would be valid in this case, they wouldn't stop an employee working with rivals. All doubt should be removed by the inclusion of a clause in which the employee undertakes not to carry on a particular trade or profession for a period after the termination of the contract. It would permit the company to seek a interim interdict in court against Dr MGleam and Ms Wilkes preventing them from breaching the covenant. Restrictive covenants are common in many contracts (partnership, share holders, buyer-seller) including employment contracts. Prima facie, such rules are illegal and unenforceable unless the covenantee (the side who gains from the restriction) can invoke the restraint of trade doctrine which was introduced into law as a result of the famous House of Lords case of Nordenfelt v. ...read more.


are not operated in by the company. Remembering that courts will interpret 'reasonable' more narrowly for employer-employee covenants, it would be wise not to try for a world-wide restraint. This simply means that the covenant would specify that the covenantor would not work within the districts where the company has markets when the contract ends. As courts do not alter covenants and can just enforce or strike them down, it is in the firm's interest not to tread over the fuzzy distinctions of what is 'reasonable'. It must be remembered that (in theory at least) the restriction on the covenanter's employment must be the minimum necessary to protect the employer's legitimate interest. The fact that both employees have senior positions in the company is useful for the covenantee, as it makes it more likely that the covenant will be held to be reasonable due to the confidential information that they will be privy to. The covenant must be restricted to the kind of work that is being done for the company. ...read more.


(General Billposting Co. Ltd. v. Atkinson) The courts tend to interpret 'reasonable' more strictly in the relationship between employer-employee than buyer and seller. It would therefore be wise not to make the covenant too wide by including a world-wide restraint. For safety's sake, the contract could be put together in a manner which would put the three parts (duration, nature, spatial area) separately. In this fashion, if a judge were to construe the covenant as being unreasonable, one term could be 'blue penciled' without canceling the whole covenant.(Mulvein v. Murray 1908) As all sources state that it is within the rights of the company to protect their trade secrets and trade connections, it is entirely reasonable for Dr McGlean and Ms Wilkes to sign a covenant restricted their right to trade with past and present clients of the company within the districts the company operates in and for a specified period of time. Dr McGlean's covenant would specifically treat the subject of electronic engineering and Ms Wilkes' would be in terms of marketing and connections. Such terms would prevent the employees getting 'poached' by rivals and would be held as reasonable and enforceable in a court of law. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    simple case of instantaneous communication between principals, and, in accordance with the general rule, involves that the contract (if any) was made when and where the acceptance was received. This was in Vienna. * There must be precise verbal correspondence between offer and acceptance * There is acceptance if the

  2. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    An incorporated exclusion clause which appears to cover the issue at hand may be declared void or subject to the test of reasonableness. The Act primarily focuses on contracts made between consumers and a business and on occasions between two businesses.

  1. Undue influence in the case of Barclays Bank v. O''Brian [1994] Lord Browne-Wilkinson was ...

    Court of Appeal in: Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge (No 2) [1998] REMEDIES The remedy in cases of undue influence is rescission. Damages are not available, but see below. RESCISSION Where rescission is ordered, the whole transaction will be set aside.

  2. What is the importance of implied terms to the contract of employment

    The labour force40 in the UK comprises of workers employed under a contract of employment or of services - employees and individuals working under some other form of contractual arrangement. The most common other form of arrangement is as a self-employed independent contractor41 working under a contract for services.

  1. Invitation To Treat

    This however, would only be recognized by the courts as consideration if his acts fulfill the requirement of economic value. The case has since been subjected to publicity since the incursion of the Human Rights movement and the resultant policy concerns.

  2. I have been asked to advise a client on considering contracting with a building ...

    The case of R V Clarke 1927 is an example of reward cases. "A reward of �1,000 was offered for information leading to the arrest and conviction of a murder. Clarke, an accomplice, gave the necessary information. He claimed the reward, admitting that he had acted only to save his own skin."


    McGhee and Skilton had both set out to commit a deliberate breach of contract by approaching the customers of their former employers in complete defiance of the restriction to which they both voluntarily agreed to and signed. The inner house of the Court of Session in McGhee and English Court of Appeal in Skilton's found in favour of the employers.

  2. "There are occasions where terms are implied into contracts which have never been discussed ...

    be reasonably assumed that the something purchased is fit for that purpose. One would not expect to be recommended and sold a drinking glass that did not hold liquid. Terms can be implied to give business efficacy to a contract, an element tat can be observed also in the areas of offer ad acceptance and consideration within commercial contracts.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work