• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Saxon Jutice

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Was Saxon Justice Harsh and Superstitious? Harsh is a word that means unpleasant and ungentle in an action or effect. Superstitious/Superstition is any type of belief or judgement based on belief that relate to God or any thing to defy the laws of science i.e. Omens, bad luck and the supernatural. There can be no doubt that there is evidence to support that Saxon justice was harsh and based on superstition because most of the punishments in 400-1500 were based on Trial by Ordeal. Trial by Hot Iron was an ordeal usually taken by women. The accused had to carry a piece of red hot iron for three metres. Her hand was then bandaged and checked again after three days, if the hand was healing cleanly then God was saying that she was innocent. Saxon punishments are also seen as harsh today because firstly the Blood Feud was introduced this gave the right to families and friends to ...read more.

Middle

Some laws might seem harsh and cruel but the King had to get permission from the Bishops and Nobles before he could state that they were laws. The method of catching criminals was also very detailed and as there was no police force in Saxon England people relied on there friends and families to help them catch wrongdoers. In result to all the violence, by the tenth century Kings had set up a system called A Tithing. A Tithing is a group of ten people and all men aged over 12 years had to belong to a tithing and this meant that everyone who was in that tithing was responsible for each other and if a person in that tithing had broken the law then it was the others job to bring him to court or pay compensation to the victim. ...read more.

Conclusion

of view when we ask and answer questions about the past and that we should also think about what it was like in the Saxon period, maybe the violence and crime was so bad that the King had to take the decisions about trial and ordeal, maybe the King didn't want to introduce the death penalty but had to because of the way the people in his kingdom were behaving but on the other hand I do think some Saxon laws and punishments were a bit extreme and most trial by ordeals were based on superstition such as Trial by cold water. This trial was taken by men. People believed that water was pure and would reveal truth so the accused was lowered into the water on the end of a rope and if the person sank and the knot went below the surface the accused was innocent but if the accused stayed above the surface he was guilty. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. What justification was there for Socrates' trial, verdict and death sentence?

    It is suspicious that these feelings were suddenly brought against him, when the feelings of abhorrence towards him were already implanted several years before. This makes me believe there was a hidden agenda in the minds of the jury, and the three accusers.

  2. The Canadian Justice system towards aboriginal offenders

    It is a fallacy to argue that the sentencing circle undermines the Canadian Criminal justice system in its entirety because vital elements of that process are preserved in the circle. For example, the Crown is a direct participant in the inner circle and "nothing interferes with its duty and role

  1. Twelve Angry Men.

    verdict, therefore what may currently be going on in the life a juror should not be allowed to be included in a jury deliberation. When a jury is instructed to deliberate, it is not time for the jury to reveal their personal life and get to know the history of the other jurors.

  2. Comments on "Cold Cuts" from Truman Capote's novel 'In Cold Blood'

    To kill an innocent dog for no reason (I don't think that there would every be any reason to kill someone...) is a metaphor of the also innocent Clutter family. I think that this story might be real because after reading the book the readre feels fear from Dick, he is so evil.

  1. Expert Testimony and Its Value In the Justice System

    explaining their own opinion as well as having the option to comment upon the testimony of any other witnesses. This is the main reason that the concurrent evidence can be much quicker than the one currently used in the United Kingdom.

  2. Arguing in Favour of the Death Penalty

    It is sad to see that the world has come to a point where these heinous atrocities are common place and that few take notice. The headlines are covered with people who have committed terrible crimes and sit on television laughing about what they've done, knowing they're not going to receive the death penalty for their crime.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work