• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Sentencing Notes

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐SENTENCING Judges have discretion as to what sentences they choose to impose on offenders. Under Criminal Justice Act 2003, they must consider the aims of the sentencing in relation to the particular offence and the particular offender: zling The aims of sentencing is set out below: 1. Protection of public 2. Punishment of offender 3. Compensation to the victim 4. Reduction of Crime(deterrence) 5. Reform and rehabilitation of the offender The punishment of offender is based on the principle of retribution which states that the offender deserves to receive a punishment that is in proportion to his crime. This applies the mentality of ?an eye for an eye? and ensures that the offender pays for his offence. ...read more.


Tariff Sentences are guidelines used to set what offences and the range of the sentence that is appropriate for certain crimes. Protection of public is an aim that aims to protect the public from the offender?s future crimes. It may be by way of making the offender incapable to recommit such as imposing exclusion orders or curfew requirements, sentencing the offender to jail or even reform the offender. By placing an offender in custody, they are prevented from committing future offences. While this has its merits, it is expensive and may be counterproductive in the case where offenders pick up new ideas from cutody. ...read more.


It is costly and not always a successful option. Deterrence aims to reduce future level of crimes. This includes Individual deterrence that aims to prevent the offender from recommitting or society deterrence that include imposing exemplary sentences to reflect societal disapproval on the offenders act. However this is in conflict with the aim of punishment as the punishment may be higher than proportionate to the offender?s crime. It may be ineffective when there is lack of publicity and the power of deterrence may weaken every time an offender is caught. A low rate of detection may also be the cause of ineffectiveness. Compensation to the victim is closely linked to restorative justice which the government use to provide remedies to their victims at the community at large. zl ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Briefly outline the various sentencing options available to the courts for both over and ...

    4 star(s)

    In the case of a mentally ill offender, the courts have a wider range of powers available to them in order to treat and rehabilitate these offenders. * Binding over order - provided for a contract of sorts where the offender will have to pay back to the victim and society within an allotted period of time.

  2. Critically evaluate the aims and consequences of sentencing and show how the laws regarding ...

    The notion of exemplary sentencing has caused some concern, due to the fact that it is all very well to punish someone harshly, but if it is not known about then it will not deter other people from committing the same crime.

  1. Notes on Sentencing in British courts

    * When considering seriousness, court take into account previous convictions, failure to respond to previous sentence and if committed on bail. For another offence is aggravating factor and makes it more serious. * Court must state reason for custodial. * Magistrates' must write reason on warrant of commitment and enter it into register.

  2. The Canadian Justice system towards aboriginal offenders

    Justice Stewart anticipates that the sustained use of sentencing circles will mobilize the resources of the community to prevent crime as opposed to react to it.30 To this extent, the effects of the sentencing circle are clearly felt within every aboriginal community.

  1. Custodial Sentences.

    During this period the offender must keep in regular contact with the probation officer and must lead an 'industrious and honest' life. The main aim of a community rehabilitation order is to rehabilitate the offender. * Community Punishment Orders This requires the offender to work for between 40 and 240 hours on a suitable project organised by the probation service.

  2. Examine recent trends in the use of custody in respect of juveniles over the ...

    The ideals of the Youth Justice Board are to enable national co-ordination of youth justice services by monitoring the work of Youth Offending Teams and the operation of the youth justice system. The Youth Justice Board also advises the Home Secretary on setting national standards; identifies and promotes the development

  1. Principles on which sentencing decisions are based

    1991, which has, as a result of wide criticism, been amended by the CJA - 1993. The key effect of the CJA - 1991 was to make sentencing of the basis of 'desert' or what the offender deserved for the offence the basis of all sentencing decisions.

  2. Arguing in Favour of the Death Penalty

    The death penalty is not handed out easily and the prosecutors do not just decide that they will seek it. Most states have certain guidelines that must be met before the death penalty can be considered. For instance in Colorado there has to be statutory aggravators, these aggravators can consist

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work