• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Sentencing Notes

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐SENTENCING Judges have discretion as to what sentences they choose to impose on offenders. Under Criminal Justice Act 2003, they must consider the aims of the sentencing in relation to the particular offence and the particular offender: zling The aims of sentencing is set out below: 1. Protection of public 2. Punishment of offender 3. Compensation to the victim 4. Reduction of Crime(deterrence) 5. Reform and rehabilitation of the offender The punishment of offender is based on the principle of retribution which states that the offender deserves to receive a punishment that is in proportion to his crime. This applies the mentality of ?an eye for an eye? and ensures that the offender pays for his offence. ...read more.

Middle

Tariff Sentences are guidelines used to set what offences and the range of the sentence that is appropriate for certain crimes. Protection of public is an aim that aims to protect the public from the offender?s future crimes. It may be by way of making the offender incapable to recommit such as imposing exclusion orders or curfew requirements, sentencing the offender to jail or even reform the offender. By placing an offender in custody, they are prevented from committing future offences. While this has its merits, it is expensive and may be counterproductive in the case where offenders pick up new ideas from cutody. ...read more.

Conclusion

It is costly and not always a successful option. Deterrence aims to reduce future level of crimes. This includes Individual deterrence that aims to prevent the offender from recommitting or society deterrence that include imposing exemplary sentences to reflect societal disapproval on the offenders act. However this is in conflict with the aim of punishment as the punishment may be higher than proportionate to the offender?s crime. It may be ineffective when there is lack of publicity and the power of deterrence may weaken every time an offender is caught. A low rate of detection may also be the cause of ineffectiveness. Compensation to the victim is closely linked to restorative justice which the government use to provide remedies to their victims at the community at large. zl ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Briefly outline the various sentencing options available to the courts for both over and ...

    4 star(s)

    This also known as a restitution order. * Anti-social behaviour order - introduced through the Crime and Disorder Act 1998, imposes restrictions on the behaviour of offenders in order to protect the victim and the community. An ASBO is a civil order and no criminal record is given.

  2. Critically evaluate the aims and consequences of sentencing and show how the laws regarding ...

    It was in Cox (1993) 14 Cr App R (S) 479 that the amount of discretion available was emphasised. Cox was convicted of theft and sentenced to detention. The Court of Appeal stated that it was still open to a sentencer to choose to give him a lesser sentence as

  1. Principles of Sentencing

    However, the extent to which people believe they might be caught is probably more important than the actual risk of detection, or the level of punishment. ´┐Ż The Home Office paper, Criminal Deterrence and Sentence Severity, suggests that for at least some classes of potential offenders, their perceptions of the

  2. The Canadian Justice system towards aboriginal offenders

    The advent of the sentencing circle for aboriginal offenders has provided the most viable alternative to the traditional sentencing practices of the Canadian criminal justice system. The structure of the sentencing circle has not deviated substantially from the original model proposed by Justice Stewart, with the exception of slight modifications reflecting the magnitude or significance of the case.

  1. Examine recent trends in the use of custody in respect of juveniles over the ...

    whether to reprimand, give a final warning or prosecute. Once a reprimand has been given, any further offence can only be dealt with by a final warning or charge. Following a final warning, any other offence(s) within 2 years will automatically result in criminal charges. Whenever the police issue a final warning they will refer the case to a

  2. Principles on which sentencing decisions are based

    1991, which has, as a result of wide criticism, been amended by the CJA - 1993. The key effect of the CJA - 1991 was to make sentencing of the basis of 'desert' or what the offender deserved for the offence the basis of all sentencing decisions.

  1. Custodial Sentences.

    the offender will serve the sentence together with any sentence for the new offence. 2. COMMUNITY SENTENCES * Community Rehabilitation Orders This places the offender under the supervision of a probation officer for a period of between six months and three years.

  2. Arguing in Favour of the Death Penalty

    In fact, at this point it is probably not the most effective way of deterring crime. If the government actually made people stay in jail for the amount of time they were assigned in their sentence, a lot less crime would be happening.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work