• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Sex and Independence - How were Kim's rights violated when he was living in a care organisation? Why would a person such as Kim be particularly vulnerable to their rights being infringed?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Sex and Independence How were Kim's rights violated when he was living in a care organisation? Why would a person such as Kim be particularly vulnerable to their rights being infringed? Kim's rights had been violated when he was living in a care organisation. Many rights, which had been infringed, are: - * Rights to be respected * Rights to be taken out, as he hadn't been taken out for several weeks * Right to freedom * Right to be treated fairly Kim was treated very badly in the care organisation. At one point one of the staff even made him eat his own "poo". I believe that the reason why a person such as Kim has his rights being infringed is because he is unable to communicate properly and defend himself. This becomes a barrier between Kim and others. Kim has no privacy and because of his disability he is not seen or treated as a real person who has needs, feelings or emotions. ...read more.

Middle

Social services can protect their rights from being infringed. They help their clients in any way possible. How successful were the advocates who worked on Kim's behalf? Evaluate what made a 'good' advocate and what made others less successful? The advocates that worked on the behalf of Kim were excellent and very successful. Ivan was Kim's advocate and he helped Kim a lot. He met every need of Kim's to the best of his ability. Ivan is not just Kim's advocate but also his friend. Throughout the time they have been working together they have built a trustworthy relationship. This is also a quality that Ivan has; he is naturally caring and understanding. One day Kim received a letter, Ivan opened the letter as Kim is unable to and handed it to Kim and left the room for Kim to read it in private. This is what I call a very good advocate as he gives Kim his personal space and privacy. ...read more.

Conclusion

Throughout his life, Kim has been disempowered by a range of people and practices. Describe these and outline the discriminatory attitudes that underlie the practice. Throughout his life, Kim has been disempowered by a range of people and practices. The attitudes that underlie the practice are because Kim has a disability and he is not able to do anything for himself. He is often neglected and ignored. Kim's opinions and thoughts are not heard. When Kim's money and possessions got stolen the care worker just ignored him. The care organisation treated Kim really badly and didn't really meet any of his needs. Kim took the organisation to court and only gained �100 in compensation. What elements of risk assessments are discussed (or implied) in the video? What factors would need to be considered when making decisions around Kim? How might resource issues influence decisions about his care? The elements of risk factors which are assessed in the video are, how would Kim cope without Ivan as his care worker? How will he get on living on his own? As he wants to get his own place. Also he wants to do everything for himself. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Custodial Care

    These programmes, which are provided to the prisoner, help them to develop their integration, communication and relationship skills before they integrate back into society. An example of one of these programmes is the healthy relationships programme also known as the 'hrp'.

  2. Critically evaluate the partial defence of Provocation.

    judge was right not to direct the jury on the issue of provocation. A whole string of cases have considered the question of who is the reasonable person in the context of the objective test of provocation. A serious conflict on the interpretation of this area of the law arose between the Privy Council and the House of Lords.

  1. Human Rights

    Except for international pressure from other sovereign states and a need to maintain diplomatic relations, there is no compulsory requirement of a country to sign and ratify the protocol. This is one of the major factors reducing effectiveness of the protocol as an international legal measure to alleviate human rights breaches.

  2. Free essay

    environmental legislations

    However Severn Trent will be effect by this act because they need to make sure that when they clean the water and have it purified, the way that they do it is environmentally safe. McDonalds are also affected by this act because they need to make sure that their product

  1. "Public policy has been slow to treat disability as a matter of equality, human ...

    Disabled people are therefore an oppressed group in society.' The inference which can be drawn from these studies is that the disability has historically existed within society at two levels, firstly a as a physical impairment and secondly as a barrier into society. Mike Oliver, comments upon this social exclusion, stating: "Disability cannot be abstracted from the social world

  2. POSITIVE CARE ENVIROMENTS

    recognising the civil rights of people with a learning disability, this then qualifies a statement that these service users had equal opportunities to anybody else. We will also realise that in 2001, the government gave people with learning disability the right to be valued.

  1. How has the European Court of Human Rights contributed to the protection of children's ...

    Fortin63, however, argues that this may actually be disadvantageous to children, imposing responsibility on them, which they may not be ready for64. A step back from such progression of child welfare was taken in Elsholz v. Germany65 where German laws were criticised for justifying refusal of parental contact solely by fulfilment of child's best interests, as this infringed adults' rights.

  2. Should people have a right to privacy?

    holding a mobile phone that was utilized to look like a Talk Sport branded radio. Irvine successfully sued for ?passing off, namely that nobody has the right to represent his or her goods as the goods of somebody else? 13(David Rose,2002)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work