• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Should Justice be the Supreme Virtue of Societies

Extracts from this document...


Should Justice be the Supreme Virtue of Societies? Social justice is distributive. It operates under the principle that each person must get his or her due. However, it is quite contentious as to precisely what each person's due is and thus opens the debate as to what justice is. Moreover, once a definition of justice is agreed upon (in a particular state), the question may be raised of how important it is. Is justice salient, or is there another concept that transcends its authority? Some argue that an aggregative concept would best suit a first principle (if indeed there were one). I would argue that justice is indeed salient, that without it there would be no such thing as civil society and therefore that it is the supreme virtue of society. Justice has long been heralded as key to the creation and maintenance of a society, yet why this is has been harder to pinpoint. Pascal argued in Pensees that "force without justice is tyranny." Underlying this contention is the idea that equality amongst all people is inherently good and should be sought after. This is because he assumes that tyranny is a bad thing and that in order for force to be used to good ends it needs to be justified. ...read more.


This is because a theory of justice should produce universal results, yet laws derived from different states' interpretation of justice are different. Therefore, the failure in Rawls' theory of justice lies in its applicability. As Miller argues in 'Principles of Social Justice', "Nowadays peoples shares of resources and their life prospects depend not only on domestic institutions within states but also on transnational economic and political forces." Why should principles of normative social justice be restricted to national societies and not extended to humanity as a whole? Yet whilst this practicality is an obvious flaw in Rawls' theory, I would argue that it is not enough to nullify it. This is simply because Rawls' theory could in practice be applied to the entire world if it were not made up of nation states. Furthermore, the world is increasingly moving towards governance through supranational institutions. These institutions have laid down universal rights (for all member countries) such as the United Nations' 'Declaration of Human Rights'. Whilst this is not quite the same as a just society where fair laws are made and moreover, where distribution is fair, it is a step in the right direction. ...read more.


A typical example of this principle in practice is the case of a healthy man that walks in to a hospital. Immediately it is seen that his organs could be used to save ten peoples lives. Under the Utilitarian principle the man would be slaughtered in order for his organs to be replaced and push aggregate utility higher. This does seem entirely bizarre yet when coupled with the idea of individual self interest, does not seem that far fetched in that the ten whose lives were saved will be ultimately more happy than they would have been otherwise. On the other hand, it does seem as if Utilitarianism would require a society of saints in order to be successful. This is the fundamental problem with Utilitarianism. It removes the idea of individual rights and replaces them with an appeal to the aggregate appeal to the good of society. Therefore, in concluding, it seems to me that justice is indeed the 'supreme virtue' of a society. Rawls' account of justice seems to portray the most accurate and plausible (in a world without nation states) description of a just society and it incorporates the idea of justice being the first principle of that society. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. A critical evaluation of labelling theory.

    system leads a young offender to view themselves differently than they did before their arrest (Tannenbaum 1938 in Lilly 2002: 110). Therefore this child has become the odd one out amongst their peers, and this may lead to a whole new set of attitudes and beliefs, which may pertain towards further criminality.

  2. Free essay

    Law and Justice

    that it is all too easy for judges or juries to 'lose sight of the wider role of criminal law' when they want to see 'undesirable characters locked behind bars'. In essence, this means everyone be treated in the same way.

  1. Balancing Competing Interests

    Lord Denning seen the problem in terms of 'a conflict between the interests of the public at large and the interest of a private individual'. He concluded that the public interest outweighed the individual's and refused to grant the injunction.

  2. Court Structure

    Alternatively the appeal may be based on the law, where the defendant argues that the court has misunderstood what the law requires for the offence in question. It is also possible for an appeal to be based on a mixture of fact and law.

  1. Microsoft Antitrust Case Microsoft is a large diversified computer software manufacturer. Microsoft produces ...

    There are a number of key differences between the two companies and their competitive situations. These differences make it very like that a Microsoft breakup, besides harming Microsoft would harm consumers and the computer industry. Microsoft has integrated in the Windows class of operating systems many functions and features that were originally performed by stand-alone products.

  2. I will look at different black theologies and different theories of justice, and attempt ...

    This condition is known as the "veil of ignorance," and if no one is able to have prior knowledge about his or her future position or statues, then compassion is ensured. This is because no "egoistic" individual would wish to help build a society that leaves them disadvantaged.

  1. In the three stories "A Vendetta" by Guy De Maupassant, "Crackling Day" by world's ...

    Once the boys got to the sons of "fathers which were black baboons" the main character decided to defend himself. "You're a liar! I screamed it. [...] My father was better than your father! Liar!" Unfortunately these words made the situation, which was already wicked even worse.

  2. Expert Testimony and Its Value In the Justice System

    Despite being released Clark found it very difficult to overcome the affects of her ordeal and she was eventually diagnosed with a number of serious psychiatric problems. She died on Friday the 16th of March 2007 from acute alcohol intoxication which was the result of excessive drinking[22].

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work