• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Sources of Law

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Sources of Law Assignment In England and Wales today the individual citizens, companies, groups, and even political parties must all conform to the Laws which are created by the English Legal System in a number of different ways. These sources of Law are very important. In this essay we will look at the different ways in which Legislation and Law is made, with a more detailed view of two of them, including the advantages and dis-advantages, and their impact. The five main sources of Law include: Parliament, Europe, Statutory Interpretation, Judicial Precedent, and Delegated Legislation. Parliament uses its powers to create new law, or statutes as they are known which tackle major changes in the modern day society. Other methods of the law making process are not strong, nor quick enough to be as suitable as statute law for bigger changes in the law. Also it is worth noting that in a democracy the parliamentary members that have the power to create the new statutes are only able to do so because they have been elected by the very people that the laws will affect. Since 1973, under the European Communities Act 1972, the legal system of England and Wales has had to conform to those laws created by the European Union, making it the top ranking source of Law in the court hierarchy. ...read more.

Middle

Ratio Decidendi translates to mean 'The reason for Deciding' in the judgment, and this is the statement that all judges must give after a court case to justify how and why they ultimately came to their decision. This part of the judgment is extremely important as it creates the precedent which must be followed in future cases. Obiter Dicta are other statements that a judge might make in the judgment outlining why the decision that was made could have been different if the details were slightly different. The literal translation of Obiter Dicta is 'Other things said'. Obiter Dicta comments can be used as guidelines for future judgements, however they persuasive precedent and are not binding precedent and thus do not have to be strictly followed. When judgments are made they will either set a Precedent, or follow one of two different types of Precedent. It is very important to understand the difference between the three different types of Precedent which are: Original, Binding, and Persuasive. Original Precedent is set when a Judgment is made on a case where the details and facts are sufficiently dissimilar from any other case making the Judgment a Law that must then be followed by the courts on the same level or lower in the court hierarchy. ...read more.

Conclusion

Perhaps the system could be revised in some way, perhaps even by looking at other forms of Precedent from around the world and applying some of their rules. America for instance, who use the concept of Prospective overruling to help provide more certainty and faith in the legal system. The idea of prospective overruling means that a Judge cannot change the law in the case that he/she is involved in, but can change it for cases in the future. At present any judge in the English Legal System can change the law at any time by simply distinguishing a difference between the cases, and then applying the new law to the case that he/she is involved in, which basically means that the parties involved may be subjected to 'dog's law', the idea that you do not know that you have done wrong until you are punished for it (Martin, 2007). This, however, would then open up the debate that a person could commit a crime, only to plead ignorance, and get away with it. These are just a few of the qualms and responses to Judicial Precedent, so in conclusion there will always be two sides to every argument, but the system has been in place for quite some time and must be followed until the time comes for a reformation in the system. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    AS LAW -JUDICIAL PRECEDENT

    4 star(s)

    The court of appeal civil division is bound to follow it's past decisions in the civil divisions unless a limited exception listed in Young v Bristol Aeroplanes applies. A criticism of precedent is that it doesn't allow judges to update the law in response to changes in society.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    the english legal system unit1 assignment4

    4 star(s)

    However there has been much spread debate on the advantages and disadvantages associated with the fusion. For example in favor of fusion is the argument that functions overlap in the present system, both in advocacy and in specialisation in subject matter.

  1. Understanding Young People, Law and Order

    A custodial sentence for an offender over 18 means: (a) Imprisonment (b) Detention at Her Majesty's pleasure for murder by under 18s (c) Life sentence for under 21s (d) Detention in a young offender institution (YOI) (e) Detention and training order.

  2. Judicial Precedent

    The Divisional Court of High Court contains two divisions of Chancery/Family, in the civil courts system, and the Queens Bench Division, in the criminal courts system. It binds all lower courts and within both divisions it can deviate as in the Court of Appeal, corresponding to the correct division.

  1. Law and Justice

    Corrective justice has highlighted problems with sentencing, and with civil law remedies. A key example is the Tony Martin case, where a Norfolk farmer who shot an intruder in his home, was faced with a mandatory life sentence. This further highlights the gap between the law and justice in regards to sentencing.

  2. AS LAW - Judicial Precedent

    But in 1992 R v Gotts , the Court of Appeal used this Obiter statement as a persuasive precedent to rule out a defence of duress in a charge of attempted murder. A dissenting judgement is a judgement that disagreed with a majority view may be used to over rule the decision of the majority.

  1. Free essay

    heirachy of civil courts

    cases valued between �25,000 and �50,000, are usually dealt with in the county court but may be dealt with in the high court, usually on the grounds of complexity. Appeal lies from the high court to the court of appeal.

  2. The Nature of Law in Society

    It also states that there shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work