• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Strength of the Jury System

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Jury strengths Jury refers to the presence of 12 persons, randomly selected into the trial procedure to be arbiters of the fact, strengthens the legal system. The role of juries are to decide on matters of fact whereas judges decide on the matters on law. In Criminal Cases, the judge would decide on the verdict, whereas juries would decide on the sentence. In Civil cases, judge would decide on the sentence and juries would decide on the amount of damages. As they do not have legal knowledge a judge would assist them and direct them. Juries are not used in complex cases or where there is a risk of jury tempering, this is stated in the Criminal Justice Act 2003. ...read more.

Middle

This allows them to come from a wide representative of the society, as opposed to the judges who comes from the upper classes. Thus verdicts can be said to be of the society rather than the judicial system as allows ordinary citizens to take part in the administration of justice. Jurors decision are independent of anyone else. Judges cannot refuse to accept jury decisions even if it is against their direction. This flexibility allows juror to make decision based on their conscience hence they can bring in decision that genuine justice deserves. In Pontings Case, the defendant had leaked information that violated the Official Secrets Act. ...read more.

Conclusion

The jury was released on Habeas Corpus and it was held that the judge must accept jury verdict once it is given. This promotes the independence of the jury in making decisions. Secrecy of the jury which forbids the jury from revealing anything said or done during their deliberations as it allows jury to bring in unpopular verdicts, promotes freedom of expression and strengthens juror role in coming to a fair decision as they do not fear to be harassed by the public Secrecy of the jury forbids the jury from disclosing what happened during their deliberations. This allows jury to bring in unpopular verdicts, promotes freedom of expression and strengthens jurors role to come to a decision that is fair and sentiment as they do not always fear to be harrassed by the public. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. ' Is the jury the "...lamp that shows freedom lives"?

    The gender and racial balance of juries has also caused some problems. The Runciman Commission of 1998 stated that three members of the jury must be of ethnic minority. Since Baldwin and Mc Convilles research this balance of juries seems to have improved.

  2. Jury decision making: Discuss the effectiveness of jury decision making.

    In the process a fore person is elected, this is normally a white middle class male who tends to dominate the group. There therefore are pressures to conform to the foreperson and the rest of the group is only one person is in disagreement (Asch, 1956).

  1. Describe trial by jury within the English legal system. How effective is trial by ...

    to bring in a guilty verdict against Quakers who were charged with unlawful assembly they pleaded not guilty, the judge ordered to not accept the not guilty claim instead they were all fined and sent to prison they then appealed to the court of appeal "Court Of Common Pleas" they

  2. Description of the jury system

    The government wanted the juries to be more representative of the population and this selection process was abolished in 1972 under the Criminal Justice Act. The three eligibility stipulations that apply today were introduced under section 1 of the Juries Act 1974 as amended by the Criminal Justice Act 1988.

  1. Psychological research has lead to a better understanding of crime in society, the legal ...

    are more likely to adopt the stereotype of a criminal and involve themselves with other criminals, in turn developing into a criminal. In evaluating this theory, evidence from studies does support that the way we treat others affects their behaviour.

  2. The Canadian Justice system towards aboriginal offenders

    life".9 The aboriginal justice process is not entirely distinct from the Canadian criminal justice system as both models endeavor to control and deter deviant behaviour and thereby protect the community. The fundamental disparity between these processes, however, arises from the restorative justice belief that "the victimizer must be addressed in

  1. Expert Testimony and Its Value In the Justice System

    In practice however the information which the expert provides can be so complex that it is difficult for the jury to comprehend. In such situations it is likely that the jury will just take the experts evidence as fact. This is not an issue when the expert evidence is correct,

  2. The English Court System

    The role of the House of Lords is to make laws and provide a forum of independence. The House of Lords is able to challenge the actions by the government. The House of Lords is known as the 'Upper House' or 'Second Chamber'.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work