• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Strength of the Jury System

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Jury strengths Jury refers to the presence of 12 persons, randomly selected into the trial procedure to be arbiters of the fact, strengthens the legal system. The role of juries are to decide on matters of fact whereas judges decide on the matters on law. In Criminal Cases, the judge would decide on the verdict, whereas juries would decide on the sentence. In Civil cases, judge would decide on the sentence and juries would decide on the amount of damages. As they do not have legal knowledge a judge would assist them and direct them. Juries are not used in complex cases or where there is a risk of jury tempering, this is stated in the Criminal Justice Act 2003. ...read more.

Middle

This allows them to come from a wide representative of the society, as opposed to the judges who comes from the upper classes. Thus verdicts can be said to be of the society rather than the judicial system as allows ordinary citizens to take part in the administration of justice. Jurors decision are independent of anyone else. Judges cannot refuse to accept jury decisions even if it is against their direction. This flexibility allows juror to make decision based on their conscience hence they can bring in decision that genuine justice deserves. In Pontings Case, the defendant had leaked information that violated the Official Secrets Act. ...read more.

Conclusion

The jury was released on Habeas Corpus and it was held that the judge must accept jury verdict once it is given. This promotes the independence of the jury in making decisions. Secrecy of the jury which forbids the jury from revealing anything said or done during their deliberations as it allows jury to bring in unpopular verdicts, promotes freedom of expression and strengthens juror role in coming to a fair decision as they do not fear to be harassed by the public Secrecy of the jury forbids the jury from disclosing what happened during their deliberations. This allows jury to bring in unpopular verdicts, promotes freedom of expression and strengthens jurors role to come to a decision that is fair and sentiment as they do not always fear to be harrassed by the public. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Description of the jury system

    Those who have completed jury service in the last two years may be excused as they have put something back into society. M.P's, members of parliament, members of the armed forces and people of the medical profession may be excused as they are already providing a service to society and

  2. Describe trial by jury within the English legal system. How effective is trial by ...

    The normal presumption is that, 'unless a person is excusable as of right for jury service, he/she will be required to serve when summoned to do so' (Practice declaration - an excusal from jury service 1988.) Majority verdicts have been allowed in Crown Court and High Court cases if a unanimous verdict is not reached after two hours.

  1. Psychological research has lead to a better understanding of crime in society, the legal ...

    Drabman and Thomas showed children either violent or non-violent videos. The group of children then witnessed a staged fight. The children who had seen the violent video did not tell their parents about the fight because they had become desensitised, unlike the other group who did tell their parents.

  2. The Canadian Justice system towards aboriginal offenders

    The discrepancies between aboriginal and Euro- Canadian conceptions of justice reveal that a system which strives to exclusively punish the offender while minimizing community involvement is unlikely to curb aboriginal criminality. The sentencing provisions utilized in the Canadian criminal justice system provide no deterrence for aboriginal offenders as punishment is

  1. English legal system

    They also said that this did not matter anyway as there was already an existing duty under s.205 of the Act. The correct procedure after deciding the grounds had been proven would have been to decide whether it would be reasonable to make an order before deciding to stay or suspend it for any reason.

  2. Describe How The System Of Trial By Jury Operates

    Any person with a custodial sentence of three months to five years is disqualified from jury service for ten years. A probation order disqualifies anyone for five years and persons on bail are disqualified for the duration of the bail period.

  1. Expert Testimony and Its Value In the Justice System

    This is due to the fact that the evidence being provided can sometimes be of a highly technical nature such that it is impossible for a judge to know if the evidence would be beneficial to the case. This is one of the major issues with the current system.

  2. The English Court System

    or those who have held high judicial office such as former Lord Chancellors. The Court of Justice of the European Union enforces EU law. In areas covered by EU law, it is the highest court in the EU, which outranks national supreme courts.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work