• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Strength of the Jury System

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Jury strengths Jury refers to the presence of 12 persons, randomly selected into the trial procedure to be arbiters of the fact, strengthens the legal system. The role of juries are to decide on matters of fact whereas judges decide on the matters on law. In Criminal Cases, the judge would decide on the verdict, whereas juries would decide on the sentence. In Civil cases, judge would decide on the sentence and juries would decide on the amount of damages. As they do not have legal knowledge a judge would assist them and direct them. Juries are not used in complex cases or where there is a risk of jury tempering, this is stated in the Criminal Justice Act 2003. ...read more.

Middle

This allows them to come from a wide representative of the society, as opposed to the judges who comes from the upper classes. Thus verdicts can be said to be of the society rather than the judicial system as allows ordinary citizens to take part in the administration of justice. Jurors decision are independent of anyone else. Judges cannot refuse to accept jury decisions even if it is against their direction. This flexibility allows juror to make decision based on their conscience hence they can bring in decision that genuine justice deserves. In Pontings Case, the defendant had leaked information that violated the Official Secrets Act. ...read more.

Conclusion

The jury was released on Habeas Corpus and it was held that the judge must accept jury verdict once it is given. This promotes the independence of the jury in making decisions. Secrecy of the jury which forbids the jury from revealing anything said or done during their deliberations as it allows jury to bring in unpopular verdicts, promotes freedom of expression and strengthens juror role in coming to a fair decision as they do not fear to be harassed by the public Secrecy of the jury forbids the jury from disclosing what happened during their deliberations. This allows jury to bring in unpopular verdicts, promotes freedom of expression and strengthens jurors role to come to a decision that is fair and sentiment as they do not always fear to be harrassed by the public. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Jury decision making: Discuss the effectiveness of jury decision making.

    However many of the jurors tend to have already mad up their mind during the trial, and the deliberation process does not rally have an effect on the final outcome of the final verdict. However there can be group polarisation, or risky shift: Apparently, groups make more extreme decisions than individuals.

  2. Describe trial by jury within the English legal system. How effective is trial by ...

    Juries sometimes make extraordinary decisions e.g. Clive Ponting 1985, involving charges on the sinking of the 'Belgrano' during the Falklands war. The judge directed the jury to commit, but they ignored him and acquitted the case. B)The use of a jury is viewed as making the legal system more open.

  1. ' Is the jury the "...lamp that shows freedom lives"?

    Jury selection is seen to provide fairness and independence. Jurors are selected at random from the area local to the Crown Court. The random nature of the selection helps to guard against the risk of a jury panel being skewed in favour of one of the parties and to guard against the perception of this risk.

  2. The Canadian Justice system towards aboriginal offenders

    the sentencing process is challenged and lay participation is encouraged".16 Judges have similarly expressed a willingness to divert from a strict authoritative role in order to accommodate the cultural sensitivities of the sentencing circle: "On March 25, 1996, I [Judge Desjardins] removed my gown, left my courtroom and joined with

  1. English legal system

    The appellants the brought to the attention of the court the case of Sheffield v Hopkins6 in support of their argument that all matters leading up to the date of the hearing can be looked at, even if they have nothing to do with the original claim.

  2. Describe How The System Of Trial By Jury Operates

    Members of the medical profession, armed forces, certain religious bodies and MPs have excusals as of right, i.e. their job is of importance to society. Anyone who has served on a jury within the last two years is also excused as of right.

  1. The English Court System

    The high court of justice is known as the Higher Court. This Court is a combination of Court of Appeal and the Crown Court. The High Court deals with first instance with all value and high important cases and also the supervisory jurisdiction.

  2. Expert Testimony and Its Value In the Justice System

    opinion on matters of human nature and behaviour within the limits of normality any more helpful than that of the jurors themselves; but there is a danger that they may think it does.? [10] This quote illustrates exactly how the jury can be made to believe that they should trust

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work