• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Strength of the Jury System

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Jury strengths Jury refers to the presence of 12 persons, randomly selected into the trial procedure to be arbiters of the fact, strengthens the legal system. The role of juries are to decide on matters of fact whereas judges decide on the matters on law. In Criminal Cases, the judge would decide on the verdict, whereas juries would decide on the sentence. In Civil cases, judge would decide on the sentence and juries would decide on the amount of damages. As they do not have legal knowledge a judge would assist them and direct them. Juries are not used in complex cases or where there is a risk of jury tempering, this is stated in the Criminal Justice Act 2003. ...read more.

Middle

This allows them to come from a wide representative of the society, as opposed to the judges who comes from the upper classes. Thus verdicts can be said to be of the society rather than the judicial system as allows ordinary citizens to take part in the administration of justice. Jurors decision are independent of anyone else. Judges cannot refuse to accept jury decisions even if it is against their direction. This flexibility allows juror to make decision based on their conscience hence they can bring in decision that genuine justice deserves. In Pontings Case, the defendant had leaked information that violated the Official Secrets Act. ...read more.

Conclusion

The jury was released on Habeas Corpus and it was held that the judge must accept jury verdict once it is given. This promotes the independence of the jury in making decisions. Secrecy of the jury which forbids the jury from revealing anything said or done during their deliberations as it allows jury to bring in unpopular verdicts, promotes freedom of expression and strengthens juror role in coming to a fair decision as they do not fear to be harassed by the public Secrecy of the jury forbids the jury from disclosing what happened during their deliberations. This allows jury to bring in unpopular verdicts, promotes freedom of expression and strengthens jurors role to come to a decision that is fair and sentiment as they do not always fear to be harrassed by the public. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Describe trial by jury within the English legal system. How effective is trial by ...

    ordered to release the jury and said they can not be punished due to the verdict. Another case is R v Mc Kenna (1960), the judge at the trial had threatened the jury that if they did not return a verdict within the next ten minutes, they would be locked up for the night.

  2. ' Is the jury the "...lamp that shows freedom lives"?

    Juries should therefore compromise a representative sample of the whole population. Also, while the judiciary are themselves independent of the executive, the presence of members of the public on the fact-finding panel may give further reassurance that the defendant's guilt or innocence is not being determined by the state.

  1. What justification was there for Socrates' trial, verdict and death sentence?

    It is suspicious that these feelings were suddenly brought against him, when the feelings of abhorrence towards him were already implanted several years before. This makes me believe there was a hidden agenda in the minds of the jury, and the three accusers.

  2. The Canadian Justice system towards aboriginal offenders

    the sentencing process is challenged and lay participation is encouraged".16 Judges have similarly expressed a willingness to divert from a strict authoritative role in order to accommodate the cultural sensitivities of the sentencing circle: "On March 25, 1996, I [Judge Desjardins] removed my gown, left my courtroom and joined with

  1. Describe How The System Of Trial By Jury Operates

    Members of the medical profession, armed forces, certain religious bodies and MPs have excusals as of right, i.e. their job is of importance to society. Anyone who has served on a jury within the last two years is also excused as of right.

  2. The jury system or right to a trial by jury is often described as ...

    complex and the trial is likely to take a long time and be potentially burdensome, a trial judge may make an order for the case to be conducted without a jury.8 Every person is qualified to serve as a juror provided they are aged 18 to 70, on the electoral

  1. Expert Testimony and Its Value In the Justice System

    The downside to such a method is that it is extremely difficult for traits such as knowledge to be measured in an objective manner. Due to this if an objective test was implemented then people who have more than sufficient knowledge and ability to stand as an expert witness could

  2. The English Court System

    In criminal appeal cases the Queen's Bench Divisional Court may refuse to follow its own earlier decisions where it feels the earlier decision to have been made wrongly. In general, the Divisional Court sits in panels of three judges of the Superior Court of Justice.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work