• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Strength of the Jury System

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Jury strengths Jury refers to the presence of 12 persons, randomly selected into the trial procedure to be arbiters of the fact, strengthens the legal system. The role of juries are to decide on matters of fact whereas judges decide on the matters on law. In Criminal Cases, the judge would decide on the verdict, whereas juries would decide on the sentence. In Civil cases, judge would decide on the sentence and juries would decide on the amount of damages. As they do not have legal knowledge a judge would assist them and direct them. Juries are not used in complex cases or where there is a risk of jury tempering, this is stated in the Criminal Justice Act 2003. ...read more.

Middle

This allows them to come from a wide representative of the society, as opposed to the judges who comes from the upper classes. Thus verdicts can be said to be of the society rather than the judicial system as allows ordinary citizens to take part in the administration of justice. Jurors decision are independent of anyone else. Judges cannot refuse to accept jury decisions even if it is against their direction. This flexibility allows juror to make decision based on their conscience hence they can bring in decision that genuine justice deserves. In Pontings Case, the defendant had leaked information that violated the Official Secrets Act. ...read more.

Conclusion

The jury was released on Habeas Corpus and it was held that the judge must accept jury verdict once it is given. This promotes the independence of the jury in making decisions. Secrecy of the jury which forbids the jury from revealing anything said or done during their deliberations as it allows jury to bring in unpopular verdicts, promotes freedom of expression and strengthens juror role in coming to a fair decision as they do not fear to be harassed by the public Secrecy of the jury forbids the jury from disclosing what happened during their deliberations. This allows jury to bring in unpopular verdicts, promotes freedom of expression and strengthens jurors role to come to a decision that is fair and sentiment as they do not always fear to be harrassed by the public. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Describe trial by jury within the English legal system. How effective is trial by ...

    Juries sometimes make extraordinary decisions e.g. Clive Ponting 1985, involving charges on the sinking of the 'Belgrano' during the Falklands war. The judge directed the jury to commit, but they ignored him and acquitted the case. B)The use of a jury is viewed as making the legal system more open.

  2. The Canadian Justice system towards aboriginal offenders

    The advent of the sentencing circle for aboriginal offenders has provided the most viable alternative to the traditional sentencing practices of the Canadian criminal justice system. The structure of the sentencing circle has not deviated substantially from the original model proposed by Justice Stewart, with the exception of slight modifications reflecting the magnitude or significance of the case.

  1. Psychological research has lead to a better understanding of crime in society, the legal ...

    (Angles on Applied Psychology, 2003, page 154) Eden in 1990 found that if we behave towards someone as if they are intelligent, they are more likely to perform better in exams. This theory can be applied to criminal behaviour, whereby if we label an individual as being a criminal, they

  2. English legal system

    They also said that this did not matter anyway as there was already an existing duty under s.205 of the Act. The correct procedure after deciding the grounds had been proven would have been to decide whether it would be reasonable to make an order before deciding to stay or suspend it for any reason.

  1. The Criminal Justice System: A Questionable Egalitarian Model

    In the world of law enforcement, this notion is often based on racial stereotyping. In this regard, Vago notes that various studies have shown an increased chance of youth offenders being referred to juvenile court when they are black as opposed to white (p.

  2. Law - Discribe the British Jury System.

    In most crown courts there will be several court rooms, each with a different case going on, whenever a new trail starts, the first thing that happeneds is that the defendant is asked whether he pleads guilty or not guilty.

  1. Expert Testimony and Its Value In the Justice System

    to the jury but this does not mean that the jury should trust the evidence any more than that of an eye witness. If the jury just sits and listens to the evidence without at any point considering its accuracy and validity then serious issues can arise.

  2. The English Court System

    The role of the House of Lords is to make laws and provide a forum of independence. The House of Lords is able to challenge the actions by the government. The House of Lords is known as the 'Upper House' or 'Second Chamber'.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work