• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The Australian Constitution is ill equipped to meet the demands of a modern, democratic society." Discuss critically with regard to arguments concerning the adoption of a bill of rights.

Extracts from this document...


"The Australian Constitution is ill equipped to meet the demands of a modern, democratic society." Discuss critically with regard to arguments concerning the adoption of a bill of rights. The founding fathers of Australia could never have predicted the society that was to come. However, the constitution- the most important document of the land- stands today with only 8 changes to the words after over 100 years of use. The constitution is not without flaws; the rights outlined in the document are far from clear, which hampers the knowledge of the public about their rights. However, this does not mean that the rights are not upheld in Australia. Sir Robert Menzies suggests, "The rights of individuals [in Australia] are as adequately protected as they are in any other country in the world" (1967). A bill of rights in Australia would provide a stable set of guidelines for both the courts and parliament to work around, but at the cost of many other aspects of our current political system. This is a case of the negatives outweighing the positives, as both sides of the argument have merit. The current constitution working with the executive, parliament and the courts provides Australia with a stable and working system that would only be endangered by further changes, such as the implementation of a bill of rights. ...read more.


However, there are measures that ensure that these laws are in accordance with the feelings and standards of society. The interests and rights of society are protected though "common law and by the good sense of elected representatives, who are constrained by the doctrine of responsible government" (Williams 2000). This means that currently, the Australians elect representatives to the parliament who can make laws in regard to rights. If there was a need for such a right, and the parliament failed in their duty to provide a law regarding to this matter, they would be answerable to the people. If a bill of rights were implemented, the premise behind representatives would be demolished. The people entrust their faith when they vote "to the chosen representatives of the people" (Sir Owen Dixon 1965). If those chosen do not perform to the standards of the people, in the next election the public are able to vote, in accordance with their beliefs in regard to the current representatives. This ensures that parliament acts through the will of the people, whilst retaining the notion of parliamentary sovereignty. An unbreakable, practically unchangeable document outlining the rights which the current society believe are important to them. Our current constitution has both rights and implied rights throughout its body. ...read more.


However, having these rights so succinctly written out may instead of the intended extension of rights, may actually limit them. To define and outline specific rights in such a detailed manner would be to prioritise and create inclusive and exclusive rights. Those perhaps less important rights not mentioned in the document would be extremely hard to implement or even recognise considering that they weren't seen to be important enough to be on the bill. Not only this, but those rights that are written down are limited by the words they are written in. The words written in a constitution can only be interpreted in so many ways before a 'right' would become meaningless. This means that important cases may be thrust aside because they do not meet within the wording of the constitution, causing perhaps the incorrect judgment to be reached, in order to keep the bill in meaningful form. Having rights written down, could create a situation where those in print are the only ones considered, nothing more or less, this limits the rights of Australians rather than enhancing them. At the present time the constitution and indeed current society functions in a highly effective manner. To add a bill of rights would be creating unnecessary confusion and would question the foundations that Australia was built on. The constitution is adequate, with the aid of the courts and parliament and the principles of parliamentary sovereignty and responsible government. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. The Land Registration Act 2002 heralds major changes to the law and procedures regarding ...

    It was solely the effect of the legislation which brought to an end this otherwise absolute interest. Furthermore, the legislation did not defeat Pye's interest at the moment of acquisition, but subsequently, once 12 years adverse possession had been made out.

  2. "In form, the Human Rights Act (HRA) is compatible with parliamentary sovereignty. In practice, ...

    far as it is possible to do so" (Wadham & Mountfield, 1999). In order to minimise the tension between protecting fundamental rights and the maintenance of Parliament's legislative sovereignty, subsections (b) and (c) accord no power to strike down or disapply legislation which is found to be incompatible with Convention

  1. "The dichotomy between employee and self-employed is being eroded in employment law, so much ...

    It was thus the lack of mutuality which leads to the decision, despite the clear control exercised by the employer and the fact that it would be difficult to describe a casual worker as being in business on his own account17.

  2. Law case study

    This only applies to children born after the date of commencement of the Act which was the 4th of May 2006. As both parents were not married, law dictates Inheritance Rights of Spouses and Civil Partners. In this case, as Johanna is deceased, Richard has the right to inherit the

  1. Case for a Bill of Rights

    This is seen as a threat to further rights that the UK population currently have, if the Bill of Rights came into place, there would be no doubt that UK Citizens would have their rights. A further important reason why the Bill of Rights should be introduced is because a

  2. How has the European Court of Human Rights contributed to the protection of children's ...

    parental rights, by biological tie75, though it has more recently ruled that cohabitation between mother and father is not necessary to establish father/child family life76. Is this not controversial and discriminative of child's family life?77 In contrast, unmarried fathers' parental rights are recognised more in many European countries.

  1. Our constitution is dominated by the sovereignty of Parliament. But Parliamentary sovereignty is no ...

    the new legal Hierarchy (Mitchell); or unified legal orders without any constitutional hierarchy (McCormick); and the fourth approach ? the skeptical, which claimed that the actual controlling authority was the Executive, therefore Parliament could not be said to have absolute sovereignty (Griffith).

  2. Should people have a right to privacy?

    It was in the public domain. Even though all speeches are privileged, I did not have to make use of privilege? 20(Saner, 2011).May 28, 2011) which suggests that Hemming felt so intensely that he disregarded a court injunction and conversed about the case under the cover of parliamentary privilege, which media was then able to report.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work