• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The Australian Constitution is ill equipped to meet the demands of a modern, democratic society." Discuss critically with regard to arguments concerning the adoption of a bill of rights.

Extracts from this document...


"The Australian Constitution is ill equipped to meet the demands of a modern, democratic society." Discuss critically with regard to arguments concerning the adoption of a bill of rights. The founding fathers of Australia could never have predicted the society that was to come. However, the constitution- the most important document of the land- stands today with only 8 changes to the words after over 100 years of use. The constitution is not without flaws; the rights outlined in the document are far from clear, which hampers the knowledge of the public about their rights. However, this does not mean that the rights are not upheld in Australia. Sir Robert Menzies suggests, "The rights of individuals [in Australia] are as adequately protected as they are in any other country in the world" (1967). A bill of rights in Australia would provide a stable set of guidelines for both the courts and parliament to work around, but at the cost of many other aspects of our current political system. This is a case of the negatives outweighing the positives, as both sides of the argument have merit. The current constitution working with the executive, parliament and the courts provides Australia with a stable and working system that would only be endangered by further changes, such as the implementation of a bill of rights. ...read more.


However, there are measures that ensure that these laws are in accordance with the feelings and standards of society. The interests and rights of society are protected though "common law and by the good sense of elected representatives, who are constrained by the doctrine of responsible government" (Williams 2000). This means that currently, the Australians elect representatives to the parliament who can make laws in regard to rights. If there was a need for such a right, and the parliament failed in their duty to provide a law regarding to this matter, they would be answerable to the people. If a bill of rights were implemented, the premise behind representatives would be demolished. The people entrust their faith when they vote "to the chosen representatives of the people" (Sir Owen Dixon 1965). If those chosen do not perform to the standards of the people, in the next election the public are able to vote, in accordance with their beliefs in regard to the current representatives. This ensures that parliament acts through the will of the people, whilst retaining the notion of parliamentary sovereignty. An unbreakable, practically unchangeable document outlining the rights which the current society believe are important to them. Our current constitution has both rights and implied rights throughout its body. ...read more.


However, having these rights so succinctly written out may instead of the intended extension of rights, may actually limit them. To define and outline specific rights in such a detailed manner would be to prioritise and create inclusive and exclusive rights. Those perhaps less important rights not mentioned in the document would be extremely hard to implement or even recognise considering that they weren't seen to be important enough to be on the bill. Not only this, but those rights that are written down are limited by the words they are written in. The words written in a constitution can only be interpreted in so many ways before a 'right' would become meaningless. This means that important cases may be thrust aside because they do not meet within the wording of the constitution, causing perhaps the incorrect judgment to be reached, in order to keep the bill in meaningful form. Having rights written down, could create a situation where those in print are the only ones considered, nothing more or less, this limits the rights of Australians rather than enhancing them. At the present time the constitution and indeed current society functions in a highly effective manner. To add a bill of rights would be creating unnecessary confusion and would question the foundations that Australia was built on. The constitution is adequate, with the aid of the courts and parliament and the principles of parliamentary sovereignty and responsible government. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. "In form, the Human Rights Act (HRA) is compatible with parliamentary sovereignty. In practice, ...

    far as it is possible to do so" (Wadham & Mountfield, 1999). In order to minimise the tension between protecting fundamental rights and the maintenance of Parliament's legislative sovereignty, subsections (b) and (c) accord no power to strike down or disapply legislation which is found to be incompatible with Convention

  2. The Land Registration Act 2002 heralds major changes to the law and procedures regarding ...

    However, where the sale takes place after 12 October 2006, the squatter's title will not be an overriding interest unless he is in actual occupation, and even then will not be protected if his occupation would not have been obvious to the purchaser or if, when asked, the squatter did not disclose it.

  1. How has the European Court of Human Rights contributed to the protection of children's ...

    is that the Court has not expressly recognised right to seek information, neither is there implicit freedom of information/ideas105 even with UNCRC in force. This disables effective enjoyment of rights106. For example, consultation with children is considered, but not made obligatory and failure to consult had never breached ECHR.

  2. Evaluate the extent to which the Human Right Act 1998 is consistent with the ...

    The section 2(1) provides for the direct effect of the Community law in the United Kingdom. However the English courts initially held that section 2(4) contains a rule of interpretation: that Parliament is presumed not to intend to override Community law unless Parliament states clearly and expressly that it intends

  1. "The dichotomy between employee and self-employed is being eroded in employment law, so much ...

    If so, then there was a contract for services11. In Hall (Inspector of Taxes) v Lorimer12, however, the court stressed that the list of factors should not be gone through mechanically. Upholding a decision of the special commissioners, the court said: 'The whole picture has to be painted and then viewed from a distance to reach an informed and qualitative decision in the circumstances of the particular case.'

  2. Case for a Bill of Rights

    This is seen as a threat to further rights that the UK population currently have, if the Bill of Rights came into place, there would be no doubt that UK Citizens would have their rights. A further important reason why the Bill of Rights should be introduced is because a

  1. The Nature of Law in Society

    Another theory refined by John Stuart Mill is utilitarianism, which proposed that the moral action was the one that produced good for the many, even if it was at the expense of the one (i.e. ?the greatest good for the greatest number).

  2. Our constitution is dominated by the sovereignty of Parliament. But Parliamentary sovereignty is no ...

    On the other hand Craig, Held by Lord Jennings, Heuston and Marshall, maintains that it is the courts that apply the acts of the parliament give legitimacy to parliamentary sovereignty. Then K.Armstrong added two more approaches from different scholars: ?Pluralist? approach, where European Union considers being an absolute authority in

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work