• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The Chamberlain Case highlighted many of the weaknesses in the Australian legal system

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"The Chamberlain Case highlighted many of the weaknesses in the Australian legal system." Do you agree with this assessment? Give examples to illustrate your answer. The case of Lindy Chamberlain was very significant in Australian legal history as it involved the conviction and imprisonment of an innocent person for infanticide. This is occurrence should never have taken place and demonstrated the weaknesses in the Australian legal system. A legal system is meant to be sturdy and never failing system that the public can put its trust ad faith in but this time it fell apart and wrongly convicted an innocent mother, wife and friend. Something needs to be done to ensure the unnecessary imprisonment of an innocent does not occur again. There were many issues in the legal system that let Lindy Chamberlain down. Firstly the expensive court system that disadvantages those who cannot afford the best. Secondly, the inadequacies of the police force. The third issue was the public bias and finally the contaminated jury. Cheap Lawyer "Justice only comes by the expenditure of large amounts of money and support of many friends".1 This statement is true. Not many people in the country can afford the best lawyer and it is true to say that if you have the money to pay for a brilliant lawyer than you will have a good chance at winning any case. ...read more.

Middle

Ward an investigator did a test in the same conditions and found threads were not pulled. The police, at a later and dryer time of year, did a similar experiment that was televised. The loops of the jumpsuit were pulled. The media got hold of this and people came up with conclusions.5 The public were given the wrong impressions and evidence by the police, a force that the public have faith in. Public Interference The incident occurred in the Northern Territory, an independent territory with its own government and a tight knit community. Indirectly policies of the rangers had been instrumental in unsettling wildlife to the extent that dingoes had begun attacking humans, a fact that no local wanted to face. The policies of the chief ranger Roff inadvertly helped cause a baby's death.6 The line of the dingo taking the baby involved human intervention7. This intervention was said (and later proven) to have occurred at a local family's, the Cawood's, home and involving many of the locals. The aboriginal black tracker Winmatti was asked by chief ranger Roff to track the dingo that took baby Azaria. Winmatti said the dingo headed west, the direction of the Cawood home and then stopped at the house.8The Cawood's already had history of treating this particular animal like a pet and John Cawood claimed to have already "taken care of it" when the same dingo had attacked another child. ...read more.

Conclusion

The jury is meant to only convict if guilt is beyond reasonable doubt, but in this case the jury still did convict despite Lindy's innocence. Jury bias is strongly demonstrated in this case. The jury system is not an adequate system if it is able to wrongly convict an upstanding citizen. There were many elements that contributed to the failing of the legal system for Lindy Chamberlain. The Australian Legal System is taken from the British system which was developed a long time ago and when scientists or journalists had much affect on the system. With huge advances in science, the average person would be unable to understand let alone to dispute and identify inconsistencies. It is too great a task to understand and evaluates a person's innocence. This system is outdated and needs to be updated as it does not allow for jury bias, diverse ethnicity, bias of expert witnesses and does not give much consideration to discrimination and small town bond. No system of human justice is perfect. Our system has its rules and guidelines yet these are mere words written on paper, in practise it is different and rules are broken or twisted. A person may suffer unfairly at the hands of fellow citizens in a jury box. Sometimes law can be a popularity contest especially in cases so widely publicised and widespread as the Chamberlain one. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    ‘Trial by jury is outdated, expensive and ineffective in ensuring justice’ Analyse arguments for ...

    4 star(s)

    never actually register to vote here in the UK (Darbyshire, Maughan & Stewart, 2001:8 - See Appendix A). Denning in turn also pointed out that these twelve people chosen from a list are expected to be able to represent the view of the country as a whole in addition to the local community as well (Sanders & Young, 2000:560).

  2. Describe trial by jury within the English legal system. How effective is trial by ...

    The judge will sum up and direct the jury upon the relevant law. The judge decides questions of law, and the jury decides issues of fact, and the judge must tell the jury what facts are necessary to a particular conviction and must take the jury through the evidence, pointing

  1. What Impact will Formalising Plea Bargaining have on Justice and Equality in the English ...

    Counsel for the defence and prosecution must both be in attendance. Finally, it was observed that a judge should never specify the sentence he or she is intending to enforce. In R v Dossetter,9 the Court of Appeal cited the passage and observations made by Lord Chief Justice Parker and

  2. Conditional Fee Arrangements and Legal Aid

    Consequently they challenged the fairness of the UK proceedings in the European Court of Human Rights, which was successful, as the defendants had not been given a fair trial. Overall, conditional fee arrangements have more disadvantages tied to them, however it has meant that there is a greater access to

  1. The Canadian Justice system towards aboriginal offenders

    As aboriginal authors Monture-Okanee and Turpel describe: The person with authority to resolve conflicts among aboriginal peoples in their community must be someone known to them who can look at all aspects of a problem, not an unknown person set apart from the community in an 'impartial' way.

  2. Describe How The System Of Trial By Jury Operates

    Jury Vetting is used to check that jurors are suitable fro the case. Routine police checks are used to eliminate anyone who they feel is unsuitable or ineligible. In exceptional cases, usually terrorist cases, jury vetting is used on special branch and police records to ensure there is no background within similar cases.

  1. Expert Testimony and Its Value In the Justice System

    The downside to such a method is that it is extremely difficult for traits such as knowledge to be measured in an objective manner. Due to this if an objective test was implemented then people who have more than sufficient knowledge and ability to stand as an expert witness could

  2. The English Court System

    The Court of Appeal is an appellate court, meaning that it deals with appeals from the ?lower? courts. It is divided into two Divisions, criminal and civil, and is based at the Royal Courts of Justice in London. The judges of the Court of Appeal are the Lord Chief Justice, the Master of the Rolls.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work