• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The distinction between having a tenancy and a simple permission to enter premises known under English law as a licence; is defined by the case of Street v Mountford. This case sets out the requisite, which is required in order to create a tenancy, one...

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The distinction between having a tenancy and a simple permission to enter premises known under English law as a licence; is defined by the case of Street v Mountford. This case sets out the requisite, which is required in order to create a tenancy, one of which is known as exclusive possession. This is often known as a hallmark of a tenancy since having this right allows a tenant to exclude the world if need be it including the landlord unless he/she is to exercise a right under the tenancy agreement to view, repair or maintain a property. (i) In case scenario (I), Jade has allowed her nephew to stay in her home while she is away in India, no rent is being charged but she expects him to look after the cats while she is away and to pay for consumption of energy utilities (gas and electricity). In contractual terms I would interpret this as Jade allowing her nephew to stay rent free on the condition he looks after the cats and for reasons of fairness to pay his way in a manner of utility bills. ...read more.

Middle

The courts tend to disregard the family/friends agreement as lease, but there has been a case where it did create a tenancy.4 (ii) The case scenario involving Graham, a mentally unbalanced man who is living in a house with four others under supervision, is similar to a lodger but the difference being Graham is under care. To understand whether Graham has a licence or a lease it would be natural to consider whether he has exclusive possession of a separate dwelling. Although there is no statutory definition of a dwelling, case law has helped to point the courts to the meaning. The case of Uratemp Ventures Ltd -v- Collins, Same -v- Carell5, states that cooking facilities would be an essential element in deciding whether it was a dwelling. Graham has a room with en suite and cooking facilities. Along with this and the weekly rent I would in normal circumstances suggest he has lease rather than a licence, he lives in a self-contained room with others in house and enjoys exclusive possession of his room. ...read more.

Conclusion

He pays rent but it doesn't state whether he has term which is the third requirement set out by the case. This scenario is slightly difficult in deciding whether the agreement is a mere licence or tenancy. Since the introduction of the Rent and Housing Act landlords have set out to disguise agreements as licences when actual fact it is a tenancy. So although in writing it states the agreement is a licence the courts will take the realities of the accommodation when deciding a case. A case that resembles similar facts, as Ted's is the case of Family Housing Association v Jones 19907. 1 Cobb v. Lane [1952] 1 T.L.R. 1037 2 Ashburn Anstalt v WJ Arnold & Co [1989] Ch. 1 [1988] 2 W.L.R. 706 3 Housing Act 1988 CHAPTER 50 PART I RENTED ACCOMMODATION CHAPTER I ASSURED TENANCIES 4 Ward v Warnke CA (1990) 22 H.L.R. 496 5 Uratemp Ventures Ltd -v- Collins, Same -v- Carell CA [1999] 6 Westminster City Council v Clarke [1992] 2 AC 288 7 Family Housing Association v Jones [1990] 1 W.L.R. 779 [1990] ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    the english legal system unit1 assignment4

    4 star(s)

    By way of section 13 of the Supreme Court Act 1981 the hierarchy of the judges is laid down and is as follows: The Lord Chancellor who is unique in being a political appointment. The Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales, The Master of the Rolls, The President of

  2. Marked by a teacher

    The english legal system unit1 assignment3 three part question

    3 star(s)

    The way in which Judges cope with this lies in the rules of statutory interpretation which constitute possible approaches, with the judge choosing the most appropriate in the circumstances and include the following; The Literal Rule: This means that the Court will apply the ordinary and natural (literal)

  1. "The main aims of the Land Registration Acts were to give certainty to title ...

    Another problem of our current system of land registration is the relationship between S.20(1) LRA 1925 & S.59(6) LRA 1925. In interpreting these two statutes it seems the courts have attempted to infer the doctrine of notice to apply, this is particularly apparent in Peffer v.

  2. Explain the distinction between the law and morals and consider the importance of the ...

    relationship of civil partnership; it seems here that the Law has actually been proactive in introducing this. The law can be seen to be following morality in the case of R v R. In this case marital rape was ruled illegal and thus the law was changed so that a

  1. Unmarried fathers and their children - has the law got it right?

    The Current law in relation to unmarried fathers and their children does not only appear unjust in various places, but it is also quite confusing. Men are considered fathers when it comes to responsibilities such as paying child support, but not when it comes to legal rights.

  2. To advise Reggie, it is necessary to look at the law of adverse possession. ...

    Even so, this argument may not be strong enough to help Reggie win the title of the property. In conclusion, Reggie would be able to claim the land if he can prove that in 1979, there was a 'new' adverse possession and the 12 years of limitation period had passed (1979-1993)

  1. Health Care Ethics and Law

    Under this it is an offence for a male member of staff to have unlawful sexual intercourse with a woman who is receiving treatment for mental disorder or who is subject to guardianship or otherwise in his custody and care.

  2. Explain and discuss the statement in Thorburn v Sunderland City Council [2002] 3 W.L.R.

    LJ, 'Parliament cannot bind its successors by stipulating against repeal'3, or amendment. It is the doctrine of Parliamentary sovereignty which makes this impossible; Dicey sates that 'Parliament has failed...to enact unchangeable enactments' because 'while retaining its sovereign character' it cannot 'restrict its own powers by any particular enactment'4.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work