• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The doctrine of frustration

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Taylor v Caldwell (1863) 3 B & S 826; 122 ER 309 (QB) In this case the defendants had entered into a contract on May 27, 1861, by which the defendants (Caldwell) agreed to let the plaintiffs (Taylor) have use of the Surrey Gardens and Music Hall on four future days, these being June 17th, July 15th, August 5th and August 19th. The Hall was to be used to host a series of four grand concerts and day and night fetes at the Gardens and Hall and the plaintiffs agreed to take the Gardens and Hall on those days, and pay �100 per day. After the making of the agreement, on June 11th, 6 days before the first day of the events, the Hall was destroyed by fire. ...read more.

Middle

Consequently rule absolute. Notes: * The case outlines the doctrine of frustration. * This case is one of the first cases under the doctrine, which speaks to situations in which some disaster has overtaken the contract which cannot be said to be any one's fault. * The contract is therefore impossible to perform, and in the absence of any express provision by the parties to the contract, further performance is generally excused. * The decision applied by the courts is that in such cases the contract is no longer binding; it just stops in its tracks. * It is important to note that in such situations the court will imply a term into the contract. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, it does not follow that in all contracts any act of negligence will deprive a party of the defence of frustration. - If the contract is frustrated, a party may still be entitled to compensation for work that it has undertaken prior to the termination, and to retain any payments previously made under the contract. - Because there is no definite list of frustrating events, and since the doctrine has developed on a case-by-case basis, it is not always possible for a party to know whether an event would be considered by the court to be a frustrating event. (Coyle: 2005) ?? ?? ?? ?? - 1 - ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    though there may be differences between the forms and conditions printed on the back of them. As Lord Cairns L.C. said in Brogden v Metropolitan Railway Co (1877): ... there may be a consensus between the parties far short of a complete mode of expressing it, and that consensus may

  2. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    (per Wright J.) Specific performance is not granted for contracts for personal services and contracts which require constant supervision. Injunctions. An injunction is an order, normally against the defendant, not to do a particular thing. An injunction cannot be used to get round the unavailability of specific performance where personal services are involved.

  1. LAW OF CONTRACT. LAW 103. THE CONTENT OF THE CONTRACT.

    It is surely much better for shipowners and charterers to be able to say categorically "If a breach is proved then a charterer can put an end to the contract" rather than that they should be left to ponder whether or not the courts would be likely,

  2. DIFFEERENT AREAS OF CONTRACT LAW

    McGhee and Skilton had both set out to commit a deliberate breach of contract by approaching the customers of their former employers in complete defiance of the restriction to which they both voluntarily agreed to and signed. The inner house of the Court of Session in McGhee and English Court of Appeal in Skilton's found in favour of the employers.

  1. I have been asked to advise a client on considering contracting with a building ...

    Acceptance must be unqualified agreement to the terms of the offer, an acceptance which claims to introduce any new terms is a counter-offer and if it is made the original offeror may accept it, but if he rejects it his original offer is no longer available for acceptance.

  2. In advising Bennys position of the interest over the said property (the flat), it ...

    wife to her husband and unmarried partners. It is asserted that Amy bought "the flat", but it was not their matrimonial home. Also, they are unmarried partners and only cohabited. Even though, there is presumption of advancement in between husband and wife, but it is still rebutted for unmarried couples at resulting trust.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work