• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The European Convention on Human Rights

Extracts from this document...


The European Convention on Human Rights was drafted as a result of the repercussions of the Second World War. The importance of the convention became apparent immediately as its existence was highlighted as a matter of urgency in the direct aftermath of the war. However, such an opinion can also be viewed to be limited when taking into account each article in the convention along with the moving on with time with different situations developing frequently. 'In democratic societies fundamental human rights and freedoms are more than paper aspirations. They form part of the law. And it is the special province of judges to see to it that the laws undertakings are realised in the daily life of the people.'1 As mentioned the European Convention exists as a produce of the Second World War, with an idea of governing relationships between states. It is argued that the convention and its fundamental freedoms is the most important instrument of international law to emanate from the Council of Europe. The idea was to introduce harmony and a sense of unity between member states. This was vital at the time as their was an urgent need for human rights to be protected. A major factor which sought to have played a part in the importance of the convention was communism and those steps which needed to be taken from preventing it spreading any further from the East to the West. The convention acted as a symbolic statement, made to show that war would never be accepted again. ...read more.


The convention is limited in the fact that it only protects some rights, due to the fact that it was not drafted for modern technicalities. A prime example being Article 8 of the Convention, Freedom from discrimination of the grounds of sexual orientation. Here the leading authority Cossey v Uk 6 where he was born male but later opted for an operation for a sex change, wanting also to marry further down the line. However according to British Law sex is defines at birth, thus in the eyes of the law he was still a man, therefore a man trying to marry another man. According to the European Convention on Human Rights there was no consensus, discretion in how it should be used, there was also a lack of understanding within society. However according to the margin of appreciation a gap was given in order for a personal decision to be made. As time moved on there was also a subtle change in the courts' attitude. In Goodwin v Uk 7 it was determined that the words did not change but attitudes did, 'The European Court of Human Rights determined that because of changes in societal attitudes the prohibition on, inter alia, the right of transsexuals to marry was in violation of the ECrtHR and such difference in treatment no longer be claimed by the Uk Government to fall within its margin of appreciation.'8 Following on from this in Bellinger v Bellinger & Another 9 The House of Lords made it clear that a marriage ...read more.


It is also emphasised that the convention is a living document and must be interpreted in the light of changing attitudes and values in society generally. Fact, The European Convention was drafted in light of the Second World War and as expected its content does express concerns of its period. However all rights have their limits, how far is one to go before they are seen to be 'crossing the line', for example in Medical Law, advances in medicine over the years have increased the chances of life, whether it be with machines or drugs, there is a blurring of the boundary, how far does some bodies right to life go. It can be successfully argued that the rights are too broad, the convention could be said to have been successful for the time it was made for but with ever changing attitudes its limitations do highlight a cause for concern. The legislation passed at the end of the 1990's had been expected unleash a wave of high profile cases, however in Scotland 98% of cases that tried to use the convention fell at the first hurdle. The impact has therefore been to make public bodies think about human rights and act in anticipation of avoiding problems rather than facing their critics in court. 'The restrictions permitted under this Convention to the said rights and freedoms shall not be applied for any purpose other than those for which they have been prescribed. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Discuss whether incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights into the domestic legislation ...

    When a declaration of incompatibility is made this does not mean that an automatic amendment is made as under section 10 of the act there is another discretion regarding whether or not to amend or repeal legislation via the fast-track procedure.

  2. Critically evaluate the partial defence of Provocation.

    Before the 1957 Homicide Act, judges frequently took it upon themselves to tell juries what could be expected from the reasonable person taking no account of the defendant's actual characteristics. This approach led to the notorious case of Bedder v DPP (1954), the defendant, an 18-year-old who was sexually impotent, had tried unsuccessfully to sleep with a prostitute.

  1. "Public policy has been slow to treat disability as a matter of equality, human ...

    Therefore it is incapacity to carry out day-to-day activities, which deems a person disabled for the purposes of the Act, in contrast to whether or not he carries them out himself is not relevant. Also what amounts to "substantial adverse effect" has been described as being more than minor, and

  2. Evaluate the extent to which the Human Right Act 1998 is consistent with the ...

    to the Community, the limited their sovereign rights, albeit within limited fields, and have thus created a body of law which binds both their nationals and themselves.'37 The Court of First Instance and the European Court of Justice exercises the judicial powers in applying or enforcing the Community laws.

  1. Statutory interpretation

    (c)The mischief rule was set out in (Heydon's Case, 1584), it consists of four main principles. Firstly, what was the common law before the making of the act? Secondly, what was the mischief and defect for which the common law did not provide?

  2. Juvenile Justice

    variety of nonviolent offenses, and 8.2 percent of the abused females connect in successive violent behaviour, contrasted with 3.6 percent of those in the control group. It is studied that females are more likely to offend more than males and intricate sentence.

  1. Law a2 notes

    Robbery is an indictable offence Actus Reus > The defendant must have committed theft > Used (or threatened) force on another person > Immediately before or at the time of stealing > And for the purposes of stealing (in order to steal - rather than for another purpose)

  2. Should people have a right to privacy?

    of making untrue statements about another which damages his/her reputation? 11(law.com accessed 28/10/11). Prior to this case, the agreement was that the English courts were disinclined to protect well-known people. For example, the decision of the Court of Appeal in the Elvis Presley case where Elvis Presley Enterprises was turn

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work