• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The general principle remains that a person is not guilty for omitting to do something." Discuss.

Extracts from this document...


Ayesha "The general principle remains that a person is not guilty for omitting to do something." Discuss. The law will punish someone if they are under a duty to act but omit to do so. It must be decided, however, whether in law you are dealing with an act or an omission. There are three types of situations where this question comes up; continuing acts, supervening faults, and euthanasia. In continuing acts the concept was used in the Fagan case (1969), where the defendant drove over the policeman's foot. At the time, the defendant did not have the mens rea for driving over the policeman's foot, which therefore, was an omission and not an act. He had the mens rea when he was on the foot and would not move. It was held that driving on the policeman's foot and staying there was a continuous act, followed by an omission, and during the continuous act the defendant had the mens rea, and was therefore liable. ...read more.


He did not try to put the fire out and just went into the next room and went back to sleep. He was charged with arson, as he did not make any attempt to put out the fire. Euthanasia is when a person assists another who is severely ill to die, by the ill person's request or by their own thinking of if they should live and be in pain or die and not be in pain. In NHS R V Bland (1993), Tony Bland, on the life support machine was severely injured. The decision in turning off the life support machine was seen as a n omission rather than an act. Some offences can be created by an omission, murder and manslaughter can be, but assault can't be, as in Fagan. An example of murder being an omission is in the case of R V Gibbons and Proctor (1918). ...read more.


The tenants died as a result of the gas boiler being broken and carbon monoxide leaking out. It was the landlord's duty to maintain all of the electrical appliances in the house. When somebody is assumed a duty of care, it is an omission, as in R V Stone and Dobinson (1977). The sister of Stone was living with him and his girlfriend and became anorexic and couldn't get out of bed. The couple started to look after her and tried to seek medical help, but couldn't. The girl then died as a result of starvation and because the couple started to look after her and then stopped they were charged with gross negligence manslaughter. To sum up, the four omissions are being under a contractual duty (Pittwood), being assumed a duty of care (Stone and Dobinson), being the creator of a peril (Miller) and having a parental duty (Gibbons and Proctor). When somebody has a duty, they must do that duty, and if they omit to do so, then they will be guilty of an offence. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Tort section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Tort essays

  1. Any crime in law is made up of two elements, the actus reus which ...

    The jury is left to decide whether a reasonable man would have reacted to the provocation in the same way as the defendant. If both of these criteria are met the defence can be used. Example of where the defence of provocation was used but failed is in R v Sara Thornton (1992)

  2. Non-fatal Offences Against the Person.

    The Law Commission in their criminal justice bill suggested this. I believe this is an important factor because for justice, which is fair and just, the court needs to be able to understand the act and offence in which they are charging the defendant in order for the right verdict to be passed.

  1. Involuntary Manslaughter

    This is shown in Kite. The managing director of an outdoor pursuits centre had ignored staffs concern over safety measures. Four people drowned when their canoes capsized in heavy seas. Both Kite and the company were convicted of manslaughter.

  2. What is the meaning of intention in English criminal law? Is it always possible ...

    The statute was in fact drafted by the Law Commission who clearly had the Cunningham decision in mind, indeed quite recently the Law Commissioncogg ggr seggggw orgg ggk ingg fogg gg. have produced a proposal for the codification of the whole of the criminal law in which recklessness is still defined in this sense.

  1. Discussing Homicide - muder - actus reus.

    For example, in WHITE, the intervening event was his mother's heart attack. However, the intervening event must be overwhelming so as to make the actus reus pretty well irrelevant. For example, if I commit a section 18 OAPA offence against you and you are rushed to hospital where your life

  2. Jenny had an argument with her boyfriend, David, which resulted in David throwing Jenny ...

    Recklessness is not a possible form of mens rea for this offence. It comes with a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. 455 Words (b)(ii) Choose one of those offences. Explain what the prosecution would have to prove in relation to the actus reus and mens rea of that offence.

  1. In this report, the differences between contractual liability and tortuous liability are explained. In ...

    Regarding to health and safety issue, according to the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974, every employer must have: 1. General duties to persons other than their employees and; 2. General duties of persons concerned with premises to persons other than their employees.

  2. That wrongdoers should be liable for their own actions is a fundamental principle on ...

    He or she must agree to be subject to the employers control 3. The other terms of the contract are one that is consistent with the existence contract of services. In Ferguson v Dawson, the claimants were employees even though the written contract had expressly stated that they were independent contractors.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work