• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The History and Main Features of Criminal Law in the USA.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Karen Mazo CJ 203-B4 05/17/2012 Criminal Law The study of criminal law is actually a study of human behavior. It is more than a study of specific crimes; it is also an examination of the rules of human behavior and criminal responsibility.[1]Criminal law is based on moral values, and many of our crimes are also violations of our moral standards.People in all societies have the inherit right to protect their society and those living in that society from acts that threaten either the society or the people.[2] And for this reason we have written or unwritten laws forbidding and punishing acts considered harmful to the group or the individual. The Colonial period in America saw changes to the English Common Law which reflected the cultural and social differences that were developing in the new nation. In many ways the law in America became more complex, reflecting the influence of ?enlightenment? philosophy and, at the same time, reacting to the concentration of power in the hands of the leaders.[3]Conflicting ideologies and shifting demographics resulted in a natural state of checks and balances in the criminal justice system. The power of the jury to decide both ?the facts and the law? acted as an informal reform of the system.[4] As criminal law developed in the 20th century, American Jurisprudence moved further and further away from common law principle that a crime consisted of two elements, a guilty deed Actus Reus plus a guilty mind Mens Rea. ...read more.

Middle

and any other physical sexual activity between members of the same or different sexes.[13]The crime of prostitution has three elements: soliciting or engaging in, any sexual activity including deviate sex, and for the purpose of commercial gain.[14]Members of either sex may now be convicted of prostitution, as distinguished in the past when only women could be convicted. However, males who offer to pay a woman to engage in sex acts may also be charged with the crime. Most states punish prostitution as a misdemeanor, and prostitutes rarely spend any length of time in jail if convicted of plying their trade. Prostitution is an age-old activity and is still considered a crime. Even with society?s modern morals regarding sexual activity, prostitution still flourishes. On the other hand, of the best known and publicized sex offenses is rape. Rape is the unlawful act of sexual intercourse with another person against that person?s will by force, fear, or trick. For purposes of rape, sexual intercourse requires penetration of the penis into the vagina. Penetration does not have to result in a completed act of sexual intercourse. There is no requirement for ejaculation or emission by the male for the crime to complete. The classic defense in most rape cases is that the victim consented to sexual intercourse. However, many rapes involve the use of threats or slight force that will result in overcoming the victim?s initial resistance. In these cases, , the defendant will argue that the victim consented, and therefore it was not rape but consensual sexual activity between adults. ...read more.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the idea of law includes fundamental rules of behavior, as well as institutions and devices for changing, clarifying, refining, and applying the rules. Law is a natural outcome of people living and working together. If people are to live among others, there must be a way to resolve the inevitable disputes. Law can be seen as the activity of subjecting human conduct to the governance of rules. Law is a systemic discovery process involving the historical experiences of successive generations. Law reflects and embodies the experiences of all men who have ever lived. Our Government has come a long way to be what it is today. However, without the sweat, blood, and tears that have been shed, our nation would not be as great as it is at present. America, started with a bold but bare Roman Code and has concluded to a revamped and refurbished Constitution. ________________ [1]Roberson, C., &Wallece, H. (2007).Principles of Criminal Law (4thed). Boston: Allyn& Bacon Publishers. [2]Anderson, T, & Gardener, T. (2008). Criminal law (10thed). STATE:Cengage Learning Publishers. [3] Law & Liberty <http://www.lawandliberty.org/justice.htm> [4] Ibid. [5] Cornell University <http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/criminal_law> [6]Arnold H. Loewy.(1987). Criminal Law. St. Paul, MN: west. [7]Roberson, C., &Wallece, H. (2007).Principles of Criminal Law (4thed). Boston: Allyn& Bacon Publishers. [8]Anderson, T, & Gardener, T. (2008).Criminal law (10thed).STATE:Cengage Learning Publishers. [9]LaFave, W, & Scott, A. (1986).Criminal law (2nded). St. Paul, MN: west. [10]Anderson, T, & Gardener, T. (2008).Criminal law (10thed). STATE:Cengage Learning Publishers. [11]Roberson, C., &Wallece, H. (2007).Principles of Criminal Law (4thed). Boston: Allyn& Bacon Publishers. [12] Ibid. [13] Ibid. [14]Anderson, T, & Gardener, T. (2008).Criminal law (10thed).STATE:Cengage Learning Publishers. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Criminal Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Criminal Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Critical evaluation of murder for A2 law unit 4

    3 star(s)

    So that is one of the hardest things to prove - what the defendant really intended when he committed the guilty act - they may not have even intended to cause GBH, but would still be on a charge of murder.

  2. The justifiable use of force in self-defence depends entirely upon the circumstances in which ...

    The defendant appealed arguing that Scarlett allowed him the defence if he believed (reasonably or not) the amount of force was reasonable. His appeal was rejected and Collins LJ confirmed that the test was neither purely objective nor purely subjective.

  1. Looking at the offences of Assault, Battery, Actual bodily harm and Grievous really serious ...

    I am now going to see if she would be guilty of a section 20 offence. I am now going to look at the defence of Grievous Bodily Harm (GBH). Ann should be convicted of GBH because; this case has quite similar circumstances to that of Eisenhower (1984).

  2. Recognition Of Necessity

    He spoke of the indicated defences having the same limitation in a sense that if you do not do this the abstract would happen. In reciprocal to the integration of necessity into duress the main trigger as to the defence of necessity being individual came from the case of Re A (2000).

  1. The regulations on arrest and detention of offenders under the Police and Criminal Act ...

    Those dangers include officers abusing their powers and harassing ethnic minorities based on stereotypical and personal prejudices that have been created and therefore, the balance between a suspects right and the police?s power is thrown into disarray as the police, if granted authority by the Home Secretary, hold significantly more power over the suspects during a time of danger.

  2. List and explain the six most important cases for the law on insanity, explaining ...

    First it decided that diabetics who had suffered a hypoglycaemic episode due to the effects of insulin were able to use the defence of automatism, rather than insanity. This was because the hypoglycaemia was caused by not by diabetes, but by the insulin.

  1. Explain the meaning of Actus reus and mens rea

    For example Hill v West Yorkshire police where it was held that the police owe a duty to the general public and not specific individuals. Explain the meaning of breach of duty Lord Alderson in Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks described negligence as doing something the reasonable man would not do

  2. 'Law should encourage citizens in their civic duty to do &amp;quot;the right thing&amp;quot; in ...

    One of the biggest concerns is that fact that the current law on omissions does not have wide enough liability. This would imply that the law does not currently place responsibility on enough individuals, and thus doesn?t encourage citizens to do ?the right thing?.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work