• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The most conventional meaning of the 'legislative supremacy of Parliament' was adopted by Dicey

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The most conventional meaning of the 'legislative supremacy of Parliament' was adopted by Dicey1 who described it by: ''(N) either more nor less than this, namely, that parliament thus defined as, under the English constitution, the right to make or unmake any law whatsoever; and, further, that no person or body is recognised by the law of England as having a right to override or set aside the legislation of Parliament.'' The unlimited legislative authority consisted of the Queen, the HL2 and the HC3. In terms of Dicey's explanation, the principle of legislative supremacy had both negative and positive aspects. On the negative aspect, it meant that there was 'no person or body of person who can....make rules which override or derogate from an Act of Parliament'. Alternatively, the positive aspect, it meant that all acts of Parliament and whatever their purpose, would be acted upon by the courts. Wade committed his attention to the basis of legal sovereignty. According to Wade, it was to be found in the rule that the courts obey Acts of Parliament. Furthermore he argued that 4; ''It [Parliamentary supremacy] is the law because it is the law, and for no other reason than it is possible for the law itself to take notice of. ...read more.

Middle

could be tied so that it could not subsequently enact provisions inconsistent with the 1919 Act was contrary to the principle of the UK constitution. No Act of Parliament could effectively provide that no future Act shall interfere with its provisions. Following on from this, the scope for legislating would become progressively reduced as later Parliaments would be bound by the laws made by earlier Parliaments. Eventually a point might be reached at which there was little need for further enactment since the statute book was full of unrepealable laws. Accordingly, the doctrine of implied repeal prevents this from happening by holding that in the event of inconsistency between two Acts, which is the most recent expression of Parliaments will and legislative intent prevails. The legislative supremacy of Parliament has also been affected by the UK's membership of the EC. This raises important constitutional questions as to how that membership can be reconciled with the legislative supremacy of Parliament. A case on Factortame (No 2); R v Secretary of state for Transport 6. The companies were incorporated under UK law. Between them, they owned 95 deep sea fishing vessels. They were registered as British under the Merchant Shipping Act 1984 and could be allotted part of the UK's quota under the EC Common Fisheries Policy. ...read more.

Conclusion

But it preserves the sovereignty of the legislature and he flexibility of our uncodified constitution. It accepts the relation between legislative supremacy and fundamental rights is not fixed or brittle: rather the courts (in interpreting statutes, and now, apply the HRA) will pay more or less defence to the legislature, or other public decision-making, according to the subject in hand'. Thus, it would seem that in the light of the decision in Hunt, constitutional statutes such as the European Communities Act 1972 and the Human Rights Act 1998 are not immune from express repeal, but that they are, contrary to the constitutional orthodoxy in respect of ordinary statututes immune from implied repeal. In conclusion, it is extremely important to understand the legislature supremacy of Parliament in terms of the United Kingdom, as suggested by Dicey and the judicial obedience. Furthermore the United Kingdom's constitution is affected considerably by the development in the field of EC Law and human rights. 1 A.V Dicey, Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution (London: Macmillam, 1959) 2 House of Lords 3 House of Commons 4 Wade, H W R 'The Legal Basis of Sovereignty' [1955] CLJ 172 5 Lord Woolf 'Droit Public - English Style' [1995] PL 57 6 R v Secretary of State for Transport, ex p Factortame Ltd (No 2) (1991) ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. "The main aims of the Land Registration Acts were to give certainty to title ...

    In Norwich & Peterborough Building Society v. Steed (1992)64 the Court of Appeal refused rectification despite the fact that the transaction was induced by fraud. The reason for this decision is that although there is a discretion to rectify under S.82(1), there is no general power to do so just

  2. Parliamentary supremacy

    Primary legislation remains under the control of Westminster Parliament in devolved and reserved areas. The progress of devolution in Northern Ireland is subject to the peace process. The Northern Ireland Assembly can make primary and delegated legislation in areas that are transferred.

  1. To what extent do you think these aims have been (or will be) facilitated ...

    interest itself, therefore the effect of overreaching is to convert the interest into the proceeds of sale. Some interests are neither registrable nor overreachable and are termed 'residual interests' are remain subject to the old doctrine of notice. Registered land, introduced by legislation of 1862 and 1875, provided only for

  2. Critically discuss the extent to which the fundamental rights provisions of the 1937 Constitution ...

    In other elections, Irish citizens are entitled to vote and so are some non-nationals. Non-EU citizens only can vote in local elections and need to register the name and address before vote. Somehow few non-EU citizens know about this due to the lack of introduction.

  1. Evaluate the extent to which the Human Right Act 1998 is consistent with the ...

    of the Parliament."12 This ensures that the courts will obey any new Act of Parliament as seen when faced with two conflicting Acts of parliament of the same statute, the court applies the later act as no sovereign Parliament is bound by its predecessors.

  2. Are the Human Rights Act 1998 and the doctrine of Parliamentary supremacy compatible?

    Integration of the Convention into UK law finally occurred with the new Labour government of 1997's enactment of the Human Rights Act 1998 on 2nd October 2000. Various academics and even judges5 have presented both sides of the argument surrounding the question of compatibility between the protection of human rights and the doctrine of parliamentary supremacy.

  1. Is the UK Parliament still supreme with regards to enacting Acts of Parliament? Discuss.

    The Second Reading (which may be hotly contested) follows a discussion of the general principles of the bill. Traditionally, Second Reading was always taken on the floor of the House, but in recent years some uncontroversial bills (e.g. Law Commission measures) have been referred to a Second Reading Committee (and Scottish Bills to the Scottish Grand Committee before

  2. Immigration Policy in the United States

    United States of America in Congress assembled, That from and after the expiration of ninety days next after the passage of this act, and until the expiration of ten years next after the passage of this act, the coming of Chinese laborers to the United States be, and the same

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work