• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The role and appointment of judges.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Judges a) The judge in a criminal case is responsible for all matters of law, and for making sure that all the rules of procedure are properly applied. Before the criminal trial starts, the judge looks over the details of the case by reading the case papers. He/she may have been involved in pre trial matters such as whether to grant bail or not and the plea and directions hearing. At the start of the trial he/she supervises the selection and swearing in of the jury and explains to them what their role is. The judge is active during the trial, controlling the way the case is conducted according to the rules of evidence and procedure; he will make sure all parties involved are given the opportunity for their case to be presented and considered. As the case progresses the judge makes notes of the evidence and makes any necessary decisions on legal issues e.g. ...read more.

Middle

The information pack includes details of the eligibility criteria and guidance on the application process. Once the candidate has completed the application form and it is received by the Judicial Appointments Commission it is checked to make sure of the candidate's eligibility for the post. At the same time an assessment is made of the good character of the candidate. Candidates are asked on their application form to nominate up to three referees. The Judicial Appointments Commission may also seek references from a list of Commission nominated referees, which is published for each selection exercise. In all cases, references will form part of the information that the Judicial Appointments Commission will use to make final selection recommendations. Shortlisting is then done. The next stage of the assessment will vary depending on the nature of the post to be filled. Candidates might be asked to attend a selection day, which might consist of a combination of role-plays and an interview. ...read more.

Conclusion

The objective is that all judicial disciplinary issues be dealt with consistently, fairly and efficiently. The complaints must be about the personal conduct of the judge and no the actual decision made by him/her. The OJC may dismiss a complaint, or part of a complaint, if it fails to meet the criteria set out in the judicial discipline regulations. If the case is not dismissed by the OJC, the Lord Chancellor and the Lord Chief Justice will consider the evidence and decide what action, if any, is appropriate. In certain complex cases the matter may be referred to a senior Judge for a judicial investigation If a complaint is upheld the Lord Chief Justice and the Lord Chancellor may decide to take disciplinary action against the Judge. However any such disciplinary action is a separate matter from the court case so it will not alter the outcome of the case. It is however, hard to dismiss a judge; any judge at High Court level and above cannot be dismissed without a vote of both houses of parliament and none has been sacked within living memory. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Legal personnel section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Legal personnel essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    European law

    4 star(s)

    The ECJ prescribed that, in order to demonstrate individual concern the applicant must be able to demonstrate that he was distinguishable from other persons generally, due to certain attributes or circumstances. In other words Plaumann had to show he was a member of a 'closed class'.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    LAW REPORT on Macgregor(TM)s case

    4 star(s)

    The question as to whether MacGregor's is in breach of its duty will be informed by authority such as Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks (1856)3 where it was held: "Negligence is the omission to do something which a reasonable man, guided upon those considerations which ordinarily regulate the conduct of human

  1. Police powers to grant bail

    These include: the nature of the offence, the likely result of the conviction, the strength of evidence against the defendant and the defendant's character. The court will also consider whether the accused should be kept in custody for their own protection and will not grant bail where the accused is

  2. Evaluate police powers of arrest, detention and search.

    It can be argued that this power is excessive as it gives the police the power to arrest someone if they have reason to believe that an incident is going to reoccur from the past. The implementation of PACE could be perceived as been one of the most effective and influential pieces of legislature introduced for a long time.

  1. FORENSICS ON TRIAL

    It is usually done to recover and identify skeletonised human remains. Forensic archaeology Is the application of combining archaeological techniques with forensic science mainly in the law enforcement. Forensic entomology Deals with examining insects in, on and around human remains to help determine time or location of death.

  2. Law and Judicial creativity

    Kairys' critical theory of law states that judges do have freedom in precedent, that their decisions are based on 'a complex nature of social, political, institutional, experiential and personal factors', and the precedents they reach reflect these views. This is true of Donoghue v Stevenson 1932, a significant development in the tort of negligence.

  1. The task of the jury is to weigh up the evidence presented to them ...

    Even though it is just one percent, this can mean up to 30,000 trials and that are usually the most serious offences, such assaulting a police officer or drunk driving are dealt with in the magistrates court while the most absurd theft can be tried in the Crown court.

  2. Before 2005 there were three main problems with the appointment procedures which is the ...

    The Government requested an inquiry into the system for judicial appointments, Sir Leonard Pelch, a senior civil servant undertook the task. The report was published in 1999. Leonard was quite happy with the quality of the work and the professionalism of the civil servants involved in the appointments process.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work