• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The rules and principles of causation not only provide fair practical solutions to the problems of criminal liability but also are founded on sound moral principles. Discuss this statement.

Extracts from this document...


"The rules and principles of causation not only provide fair practical solutions to the problems of criminal liability but also are founded on sound moral principles." Discuss this statement. When deciding whether a defendant is guilty of an offence the court will look to see if the defendant was the cause of the consequence. The three aspects the prosecution must prove are; that the defendant was the factual cause, the legal cause and that there were no intervening acts which broke the chain of causation. In order to establish whether the defendant's actions were the factual cause, the court will decide whether the consequence would not have happened but for the defendant's conduct. This is referred to as the 'but for' test and was used in R V Pagett 1983 to show that the defendant's girlfriend would not have died but for the fact he held her hostage as a human shield against police gunfire. The 'but for' test can also prove a defendant not guilty of a criminal offence, such as the case of R V White. ...read more.


When establishing legal causation the court may employ the 'thin skull rule'. This rule states that if the victim has something unusual about their physical or mental state which makes an injury more serious, then the defendant will be liable for the more serious injury. In R V Blaue the defendant stabbed the victim, and as a result the victim needed a blood transfusion, but refused it as it went against their beliefs as a Jehovah's Witness. The victim died and the defendant was charged with murder. The 'thin skull rule' is a good example of where the law is built on moral principles because it encourages to reconsider the consequences of their actions by showing more concern for others in fear that they may be victimising the vulnerable. If factual and legal causation is proven a chain of causation is created in order to establish whether something else happened after the defendant's actions which may have contributed to the consequence. This is referred to as an intervening act and can either be an act of a third party, the victim's own acts, or a natural but unpredictable event. ...read more.


As this was a foreseeable action of the victim, the defendant would be the causation of the victim's injuries. However, in R V Williams the victim jumped from the defendant's car to prevent his wallet from being stolen and died as a result. This was deemed to be an unforeseeable act of the victim in which cannot be blamed on the defendant. This distinction in the law poses a great deal of controversy in society's morals as a defendant could claim there were 'unforeseeable consequences' for any offence in order to gain a not guilty verdict. This raises the question of where does society 'draw the line' to keep the law fair and precedential, and how will justice be delivered for the victims who have died or sustained serious injuries because of the defendants conduct. In order for moral principles to be upheld in these cases, a jury would need to decide whether the victim's actions were foreseeable based on the case's own merits alone which goes against the doctrine of precedent of which our legal system is built upon. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Criminal Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Criminal Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    English law does not normally impose liability for an omission or failure to act ...

    4 star(s)

    An example of this is R v Gibbins & Proctor 1918 this is when D and his common law wife failed to feed the man's 7 year-old child, Nelly, and she died from starvation. The woman hated Nelly, and was clearly the moving force.

  2. The justifiable use of force in self-defence depends entirely upon the circumstances in which ...

    Even though possessing explosive substances is an offence under the Explosive Substances Act 1883, he was still allowed the defence. This may, however, be too unreasonable to produce petrol bombs and they are very dangerous. This, therefore, broadens the defence.

  1. Human Trafficking In Australia. This essay will be covering different aspect of human ...

    The United Nations International Labour Organisation (ILO) played a major role in the development in ruling out slavery with new laws. Their main aim was to enforce the idea that countries should be free to rule themselves- means that adherence to international law is largely voluntary and its enforcement is challenged.

  2. Explain what is meant by the term 'causation' in criminal law and assess how ...

    Some have said that you shouldn?t be responsible for causing the death of someone if you did not know that they had a mental or physical abnormality/condition that would result in them dying when you only intended for them to or thought they would suffer serious injury, as with the

  1. 'Law should encourage citizens in their civic duty to do "the right thing" in ...

    operation, as if doctors were liable, then it is unlikely a doctor would be willing to perform the operation in fear of making a mistake and being criminally liable. When discussing whether the criminal law on omissions encourages people to do ?the right thing?, the problems/criticisms of the law on omissions should also be examined.

  2. The History and Main Features of Criminal Law in the USA.

    Domestic violencealso known as domestic abuse is defined as a pattern of abusive behaviors by one partner against another in an intimate relationship such as marriage, dating, family, or cohabitation. The definition adds that domestic violence can happen to anyone regardless of race, age, sexual orientation, religion, or gender.In addition,

  1. Explain what is meant by the term causation in criminal law and assess how ...

    Even though the gunshot wound had almost healed the victim died due to negligent treatment. The negligent treatment must be so independent of D?s acts, and in itself so potent in causing death, that they regard the contribution made by his acts as insignificant.? The courts will use whichever direction will avoid breaking the chain of causation.

  2. The regulations on arrest and detention of offenders under the Police and Criminal Act ...

    force, and to reduce the number of miscarriages of justices, there are still problems within PACE with creating a fair balance between the police and a suspect as well as still allowing room for the police to abuse their power.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work