• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Selection and Role of Juries

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Chapter 6 Juries Role of Jury The function of jurors is to decide on matters of fact. They are mainly found in criminal trials in Crown Court and their job Is to listen to the evidence presented to the court and to decided who did what so that they can announce a verdict. They must not be persuaded or led into a verdict by any unfair means within the court, but must be allowed to deliberate ?in complete freedom? ? said in R V McKenna (1960) en quashing a verdict which was made when the jury had been told they would be detained overnight if they did not hurry up. The trial is presided over by a judge and functions split between the judge and jury. The judge decides on points of law and the jury decide the facts. The judge will sum up the case at the end to the jury and advise them on any law involved. The jury retire to a private rooand make the decision on guilty or innocence of the accused in secret. The judge must accept the jury verdict even if he/she does not agree with it. ...read more.

Middle

The limits on vetting for previous conviction were stressed again in R v Obellim and Others (1996). The case concerned a criminal trial in which the judge had received a written question from the jury which displayed a lot of knowledge about police powers and led him to suspect that one of the jurors might ordered a security check on the jury without telling the defence counsel who discovered the check had taken place when the jury complained about it after delivering its verdict. The defendant was convicted and appeal on the ground that the check on jury members might have prejudiced them. The Court of Appeal agreed and quashed the conviction stating that it was questionable whether the check should have been ordered at all on such a ground and it certainly should not have been carried out without informing defence counsel. Selection at court Jurors are usually divided into groups of 15 and allocated to court. At the strat of trial, the court clerk will select 12 out of these 15 at random. The selected jurors are most commonly divided into groups of 15 and then assigned to a court case. ...read more.

Conclusion

The prosecution does not have to give a reason for standing by the Attorney-General?s guidelines make it clear that this power should be used sparingly. Majority Verdicts If after at least 2 hours (longer where there are several defendants), the jury have not reached a verdict, the judge can call them back into the courtroom and direct them that he can now accept a majority verdict. Where there is a full jury of 12, the verdict can be 10:2 or 11:1 either for guilty or for not guilty. If the jury has fallen below 12 for any reason such as death or illness of a juror during trial then only one can disagree with the verdict. They accept a majority of 10:1 or 9:1. If there are only 9 jurors, the verdict must be unanimous. A jury cannot go below nine. Majority verdicts were introduced because of the fear of jury ?nobbling? that is jurors being bribed or intimidated by associates of the defendant into voting for a not guilty verdict. When a jury has to be unanimous, only one member needs to be bribed to cause a ?stalemate? in which the jury were unable to reach a decision. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Legal personnel section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Legal personnel essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    European law

    4 star(s)

    The ECJ has accepted the parliament's right to bring in an action, this is evident from the Chernobyl case.36 The Court of Appeal and the ECB may commence an action, in cases where rights or interests are clearly affected. Furthermore, the treaty provides that any natural or legal person may

  2. Marked by a teacher

    LAW REPORT on Macgregor(TM)s case

    4 star(s)

    Hotel and its insurer would be best advised to settle the matter out of court to avoid the management time, expense and negative publicity that would be entailed in litigation. Peter vs MacGregor On the matter of Peter's stolen Olympus camera I'm relying on the provision provided under the Hotel

  1. Evaluate police powers of arrest, detention and search.

    the Act and therefore there was no restriction on the length of time that a person could be detained for. This was strictly addressed under s.30 of PACE which clearly divides powers of detention into distinct time periods. Section 30 requires any arrested person to be brought as soon as practicable to a police station.

  2. Free essay

    Legal personnel

    The eight areas of skills will compromise of tuition on interviewing skills, oral exercises, opinion writing, legal research, and negotiation, etc. On the other hand the five areas of knowledge will include civil litigation and remedies, evidence, professional ethics and criminal litigation, (www.barstandardsboard.org.uk); the purpose of this mixture of practical

  1. Explain the role of the ECJ.

    the interpretation of treaties; (b) the validity and interpretation of acts of the institutions of the union and finally (c) the interpretation of the statutes of bodies established by an act of the council, where those statutes so provide". The ECJ only makes a preliminary ruling on the point of law, so they do not actually decide the case.

  2. FORENSICS ON TRIAL

    She was drowned in a shallow pool. The police found footprints in the damp earth near the pool. There were also a grain of wheat and chaff that were spread around and was later on dealt with. Later in the 20th century, many British pathologists including Bernard Spilsbury and Francis camps new forensic methods in Britain.

  1. The task of the jury is to weigh up the evidence presented to them ...

    The majority of criminal offences are summarily only, and became there are in general, the least serious offences, they are also the ones most commonly committed. As a result, 95 percent of criminal cases are heard in the magistrates' court where juries have no role in the court.

  2. Family Law

    if the petitioner as well as the respondent has committed adultery it may be difficult to convince the court that it is intolerable for them to continue living together. If the petitioner and the respondent live tighter for a period of six month after petitioner discovers the respondent's adultery, the petitioner cannot rely upon unless the adultery continuing.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work