• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

the war on terrorism is more than a war or public emergency threatening the life of the nation, and in many ways can be seen to be a clash of civilisations

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Law 101 Coursework Three (Public Law) Samuel Huntington1 has been warning against a 'clash of civilisations' for more than a decade and now there seems to have been one, seen most influentially with the twin towers attacks and the London bombings. There has been a knee jerk reaction to attacks such as these by western countries, for example the USA Patriot Act in America. The Patriot Act remains highly disputed2, but America was unified behind their president at the time of proposal and anything he could be seen to do to stop terrorism was embraced. A similar view was taken in the UK and the Anti terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 was enacted. This act takes a great deal from civil liberties and freedoms, and allows powers contrary to article 5 of the Human Rights Act 1998. A quote taken from the liberty website states that 'Anti Terrorism measures have done little to ensure that Britain is safe and secure from terrorist attack, but much to infringe the civil liberties of those living in the UK'3 and I think this view would be the consensus of the common man if he were told of the possibilities this act permits, for example Lord Hoffman tells us that any man could be detained ...read more.

Middle

Lord Hoffman declares in A and Others (2004) that 'it is for Parliament to decide whether to give the terrorists such a victory', and by giving powers such as these given under the Anti terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 parliament are doing this. Instead of trying to find the reasons behind terrorism, the government is trying its hardest to stop it. The best method of preventing terrorism would be to first understand why we are the victims of terrorism. Could the source of terrorist attacks be the unfounded, highly controversial war in Iraq? The UK had to derogate in relation to the Anti terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001. The general rule is that where a State decides there is a need for derogation, the courts must not only be convinced of the need for derogation, but also that the derogation was proportionate to the need by not eliminating more individual rights than necessary. In removing the right to freedom by increasing pre trial detention indefinitely it could be said that parliament have acted incompatibly with Human Rights Act 1998 and have reacted too strongly to the terrorist actions, removing more rights than necessary. ...read more.

Conclusion

To try and do so would hand the terrorists a victory beyond their dreams.' The UK, by derogating from the Human Rights Act 1998 has done just this; given the terrorists a small victory. To work with the countries the terrorists originate from and work toward making the world a better place may also give them a victory, but of a different kind. Terrorism aims to disrupt to prove a political or ideological point, but if that point were to become obsolete, the terrorist organisation would also become obsolete, and the occurrence of countries harbouring terrorists would reduce greatly. In conclusion, I think Lord Hoffman's view, that the war on terrorism is more than a war or public emergency threatening the life of the nation, and in many ways can be seen to be a clash of civilisations. In fighting this 'war' on terror we must however be sure not to disrupt our own beliefs and system of values, and act as humanitarian as possible. If we work together with the countries, Europe as a whole can come through this 'war' relatively unscathed. We must remember to tone down the more radical action being taken recently however, as incidents like the Charles de Menezes shooting show. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Outline many of the basic elements of law that relate to business and marketing.

    What is meant by this is that the OCBA makes sure that all businesses and consumers are abiding by current laws , and also dealing with those who do not follow the law. Marketers need to follow laws at all times in relation to the sale and promotion of some

  2. How has the European Court of Human Rights contributed to the protection of children's ...

    than enforce their freedom to obtain relevant information, which Fortin strongly argues to be an erring interpretation109. The Court upheld a book's governmental censorship for its obscene material aimed at adolescents, justifying its decision by Art. 10(2) - protection of children's moral development - which in itself would not totally

  1. Outcome (3): Analyse the provisions relating to the police powers of arrest, search, seizure, ...

    One of the conditions under section 24 of this act is that of 'identity'. A police constable has the power to arrest someone if he/she has reasonable grounds for having reservations about the person's identity. The same principle also apply to a persons address, as a police constable has the

  2. Extradition of terrorists

    It would previously have been difficult to extradite someone for being a 'suspected' terrorist if this was not a crime recognised in other countries. There has been the adoption of a European arrest warrant1 that allows simple fast-track arrangements between the EU states and Gibraltar, the secretary of state's role

  1. It could be argued that the employment tribunal system is a breach of Article ...

    seen as important to national security will be more problematic to justify. Also the issue of whether drug and alcohol tests breach Article 8, if such the tests insure public safely then they are not deemed a breach. The following two cases exhibit were the tests were warranted.

  2. In English

    11 {c} of the MCA 1973, but the provision was declared incompatible with the European Convention, breach of Art 8 (the right to family life) and Art 12 (the right to marry). The probably clearest decision under the human rights act (s.3)

  1. In what ways does a Bolero Electronic Bill of Lading differ significantly from a ...

    On the contrary, at a traditional bill of lading you may never find out the real identity of the person you are dealing with. If someone wishes to use Bolero must become a user/member and all of them agree to comply with the rulebook.

  2. Immigration Policy in the United States

    and Naturalization Service (I.N.S.)- was designated as a bureau in 1895 with responsibility for administering the alien contract-labor laws. In the following years Congress passed twelve laws that dealt with immigration. Three quarters of these laws specifically aimed to keep the sick, criminal, and those found to have "unacceptable" morals or politics out of the United States.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work