• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

the war on terrorism is more than a war or public emergency threatening the life of the nation, and in many ways can be seen to be a clash of civilisations

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Law 101 Coursework Three (Public Law) Samuel Huntington1 has been warning against a 'clash of civilisations' for more than a decade and now there seems to have been one, seen most influentially with the twin towers attacks and the London bombings. There has been a knee jerk reaction to attacks such as these by western countries, for example the USA Patriot Act in America. The Patriot Act remains highly disputed2, but America was unified behind their president at the time of proposal and anything he could be seen to do to stop terrorism was embraced. A similar view was taken in the UK and the Anti terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 was enacted. This act takes a great deal from civil liberties and freedoms, and allows powers contrary to article 5 of the Human Rights Act 1998. A quote taken from the liberty website states that 'Anti Terrorism measures have done little to ensure that Britain is safe and secure from terrorist attack, but much to infringe the civil liberties of those living in the UK'3 and I think this view would be the consensus of the common man if he were told of the possibilities this act permits, for example Lord Hoffman tells us that any man could be detained ...read more.

Middle

Lord Hoffman declares in A and Others (2004) that 'it is for Parliament to decide whether to give the terrorists such a victory', and by giving powers such as these given under the Anti terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 parliament are doing this. Instead of trying to find the reasons behind terrorism, the government is trying its hardest to stop it. The best method of preventing terrorism would be to first understand why we are the victims of terrorism. Could the source of terrorist attacks be the unfounded, highly controversial war in Iraq? The UK had to derogate in relation to the Anti terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001. The general rule is that where a State decides there is a need for derogation, the courts must not only be convinced of the need for derogation, but also that the derogation was proportionate to the need by not eliminating more individual rights than necessary. In removing the right to freedom by increasing pre trial detention indefinitely it could be said that parliament have acted incompatibly with Human Rights Act 1998 and have reacted too strongly to the terrorist actions, removing more rights than necessary. ...read more.

Conclusion

To try and do so would hand the terrorists a victory beyond their dreams.' The UK, by derogating from the Human Rights Act 1998 has done just this; given the terrorists a small victory. To work with the countries the terrorists originate from and work toward making the world a better place may also give them a victory, but of a different kind. Terrorism aims to disrupt to prove a political or ideological point, but if that point were to become obsolete, the terrorist organisation would also become obsolete, and the occurrence of countries harbouring terrorists would reduce greatly. In conclusion, I think Lord Hoffman's view, that the war on terrorism is more than a war or public emergency threatening the life of the nation, and in many ways can be seen to be a clash of civilisations. In fighting this 'war' on terror we must however be sure not to disrupt our own beliefs and system of values, and act as humanitarian as possible. If we work together with the countries, Europe as a whole can come through this 'war' relatively unscathed. We must remember to tone down the more radical action being taken recently however, as incidents like the Charles de Menezes shooting show. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Extradition of terrorists

    It would previously have been difficult to extradite someone for being a 'suspected' terrorist if this was not a crime recognised in other countries. There has been the adoption of a European arrest warrant1 that allows simple fast-track arrangements between the EU states and Gibraltar, the secretary of state's role

  2. How has the European Court of Human Rights contributed to the protection of children's ...

    Incidentally, England sets the youngest age amongst most European countries for criminal responsibility - 10. In Hussain v. United Kingdom94, s. 53 Children and Young Persons Act 1933 regulating release of young offenders during post-tariff detention was held to have infringed Art.

  1. Outcome (3): Analyse the provisions relating to the police powers of arrest, search, seizure, ...

    power without a warrant to arrest someone for a none arrestable offence. A police constable may use these powers and arrest some one when he/she has reasonable grounds to believe that an arrestable offence has been committed. There are also general arrest conditions under section 24 of the Police and

  2. In English

    The issue before the House of Lords was whether Mrs Wainwright and her son were entitled to claim compensation for the distress suffered.

  1. In what ways does a Bolero Electronic Bill of Lading differ significantly from a ...

    It is a multilateral contract and everyone agrees to use it as contracted. None of the members could perform otherwise than stated in the rulebook. Furthermore, under Bolero there are strong security controls and procedures to protect the integrity and prove the authenticity of electronic messages which do not and could not exist under the traditional bills of lading.

  2. It could be argued that the employment tribunal system is a breach of Article ...

    unless the employee had preciously warning that the employer was "tapping" the phones. This case had significant implications concerning Article 8 and employer surveillance. Interfering with emails at work may prima facie be breaching Article 8, the only justification for this offence will be to protect others for example an offensive email which can amount to harassment.

  1. Indigenous peoples, almost without exception, have been dispossessed and disregarded by those who 'discovered' ...

    All peoples have the right of self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development. 2. All peoples may, for their own ends, freely dispose of their natural wealth and resources without prejudice to any obligations arising out

  2. Outline many of the basic elements of law that relate to business and marketing.

    across Australia and New Zealand will prove to be effective enough to protect consumers from the devastating effects of scams. What can be done to bring scam-artists to justice? Unfortunately, according to ASIC (2006), many scams are online operations, often based in other countries and are very hard to trace.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work