• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

There are two ways of committing common assault which are assault and battery. Both of there offences are charged under s39 criminal justice act 1988 and summary offences.

Extracts from this document...


There are two ways of committing common assault which are assault and battery. Both of there offences are charged under s39 criminal justice act 1988 and summary offences. Firstly I am going to look at assault which is known as a technical assault or psychic assault. Assault is when defendant intentionally or subjectively recklessly causes another person to fear immediate unlawful personal violence. For the Actus Reus of assault, you must establish that there has been an act which has caused another person to apprehend the infliction of immediate, unlawful force. An assault requires some acts or word this can be seen in Lodgon v DPP where defendant opened a drawer in his office to show another person that there was a gun in it, which defendant said was loaded. In fact the gun was fake. The actions of defendant were held to amount to an assault. Words are sufficient to amount to an assault which can be seen in Constanza (1997) the CA held that letters can be an assault. In this case defendant had written 800 letters and made a number of phone calls to the victim. The victim interpreted the last two letters as clear threats. ...read more.


The court held that the officer had committed a battery and the defendant was entitled to free herself. For a battery to be committed the force must be unlawful. Thus a parent who smacks his child, depending on the circumstances of the case, may not be inflicting' unlawful' force. This can be seen in A v UK (1998) where a father who had beaten his son with a garden cane, the ECHR ruled that a law allowing force to be used on children offends art 3 of the ECHR. Nevertheless despite this ruling in England if the force is used to correct a child, then this is lawful. A battery can be through an indirect at which can be seen in Martin (1881) where the defendant placed an iron bar across the doorway of a theatre. He then witched off the lights. In the panic that followed, several of the audience were injured when they were trapped and unable to open the door. We can see that in Martin's case the defendant did not directly cause injury to the audience but did so via other means. A battery may be committed through a continuing ac as in Fagan v Metropolitan Police Commander (1968) ...read more.


Psychiatric injury also classed as 'actual bodily harm'. In the case of Ann, injuries to Ben were more severe than assault and battery as he lost the sight in one eye. there is no additional mens rea requirement for that of Actual bodily harm thus the mens rea for common assault will suffice and althoughtABH is more serios offence, recklessness will suffice, and provide that there is a risk involved it need not to be a serious risk. R v Savage (1991) where a women in a pub threw beer over another woman. in doing this the glass slipped from defendant's hand and the victim's hand was cut by glass. the defendant said that she had only intended to throw beer over her victim. she had not intended her to be injured, nor had realised that there was a risk of injury. held in the HL: the fact that she had intended to throw beer over the women meant that she had intend to apply unlawful force. in the case of Ann and Ben, which is quite similar to the case of R v Savage, Ann did intended some harm to her victim as she tried to punch him but it cant be Actual Bodily Harm because the injuries to Ben were more severe then ABH so now i am going to look at GBH S20 to find out Ann's Criminal liability. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Criminal Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Criminal Law essays

  1. Non-Fatal Offences - Notes and Evaluation.

    Assault and Battery are classed as offences of basic intent, which means that if the defendant is intoxicated when doing the actus reus, he is considered as doing it recklessly, as stated by the House of Lords in DPP v Majewski (1976).

  2. Looking at the offences of Assault, Battery, Actual bodily harm and Grievous really serious ...

    But that, whatever he might be going to do next, and sufficiently immediately for the purposes of the offence was something of a violent nature. In effect, it was wholly open to the justices to infer that her state of mind was not only that of terror, which they did

  1. Law on women

    By looking at the risk of female victim discrimination- every year 120 women and 30 men are killed by a current or former partner. By looking at the female defendants discrimination we can see that men seem to get away more often then women by using provocation as a defence.

  2. A person who genuinely attempts to commit a criminal offence and fails still deserves ...

    In many cases the defendant has tried very hard to complete the offence and has only failed because of impossibility, carelessness or the interference of the police. One such example is R v Shivpuri where the defendant was paid to act as a drugs courier.

  1. Explain what is meant by the term 'causation' in criminal law and assess how ...

    Whilst the defendant?s act was not the factual cause, he was still guilty as it was his act that placed the victim in a brain dead state, which resulted in her life support being turned off and her death. This case shows how the courts look at the root cause

  2. Explain the meaning of Actus reus and mens rea

    reus of a crime but the result is slightly different to that planned then the mens rea is transferred to the actual result. For example if A wants to kill B and shoots but misses and kills C then A is still liable for murder as his malice (intent)

  1. The History and Main Features of Criminal Law in the USA.

    Sir William Blackstone stated that there were three kinds of homicide: justifiable, excusable and criminal.[8]All three of these were the killing of another human being and the distinction between them involved the circumstances surrounding the killing. Sir Williams added that the first one involved no guilt, the second involved little

  2. How Satisfactory Is The Current Law On The Deception Offences?

    There are two different cases which are prominent in this instance. In DPP v Ray the courts stretched the law to include silence where the defendant had changed his mind about paying. This appears to give an unjustified meaning to deception.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work