• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

There are two ways of committing common assault which are assault and battery. Both of there offences are charged under s39 criminal justice act 1988 and summary offences.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

There are two ways of committing common assault which are assault and battery. Both of there offences are charged under s39 criminal justice act 1988 and summary offences. Firstly I am going to look at assault which is known as a technical assault or psychic assault. Assault is when defendant intentionally or subjectively recklessly causes another person to fear immediate unlawful personal violence. For the Actus Reus of assault, you must establish that there has been an act which has caused another person to apprehend the infliction of immediate, unlawful force. An assault requires some acts or word this can be seen in Lodgon v DPP where defendant opened a drawer in his office to show another person that there was a gun in it, which defendant said was loaded. In fact the gun was fake. The actions of defendant were held to amount to an assault. Words are sufficient to amount to an assault which can be seen in Constanza (1997) the CA held that letters can be an assault. In this case defendant had written 800 letters and made a number of phone calls to the victim. The victim interpreted the last two letters as clear threats. ...read more.

Middle

The court held that the officer had committed a battery and the defendant was entitled to free herself. For a battery to be committed the force must be unlawful. Thus a parent who smacks his child, depending on the circumstances of the case, may not be inflicting' unlawful' force. This can be seen in A v UK (1998) where a father who had beaten his son with a garden cane, the ECHR ruled that a law allowing force to be used on children offends art 3 of the ECHR. Nevertheless despite this ruling in England if the force is used to correct a child, then this is lawful. A battery can be through an indirect at which can be seen in Martin (1881) where the defendant placed an iron bar across the doorway of a theatre. He then witched off the lights. In the panic that followed, several of the audience were injured when they were trapped and unable to open the door. We can see that in Martin's case the defendant did not directly cause injury to the audience but did so via other means. A battery may be committed through a continuing ac as in Fagan v Metropolitan Police Commander (1968) ...read more.

Conclusion

Psychiatric injury also classed as 'actual bodily harm'. In the case of Ann, injuries to Ben were more severe than assault and battery as he lost the sight in one eye. there is no additional mens rea requirement for that of Actual bodily harm thus the mens rea for common assault will suffice and althoughtABH is more serios offence, recklessness will suffice, and provide that there is a risk involved it need not to be a serious risk. R v Savage (1991) where a women in a pub threw beer over another woman. in doing this the glass slipped from defendant's hand and the victim's hand was cut by glass. the defendant said that she had only intended to throw beer over her victim. she had not intended her to be injured, nor had realised that there was a risk of injury. held in the HL: the fact that she had intended to throw beer over the women meant that she had intend to apply unlawful force. in the case of Ann and Ben, which is quite similar to the case of R v Savage, Ann did intended some harm to her victim as she tried to punch him but it cant be Actual Bodily Harm because the injuries to Ben were more severe then ABH so now i am going to look at GBH S20 to find out Ann's Criminal liability. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Criminal Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Criminal Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Is the current law on the non-fatal offences against the person satisfactory?

    4 star(s)

    A higher level of mens rea would be necessary than for the current legislation, where the defendant need only foresee some harm in order to be convicted of GBH (Mowatt), and he need not foresee the consequences required for the actus reus of the offence of ABH (Roberts).

  2. Non-Fatal Offences - Notes and Evaluation.

    If the force is excessive then it is a criminal offence. The Mens Rea for battery is either an intention to apply unlawful personal violence to another person or recklessness as the whether unlawful force is applied - the defendant must realise that there is a risk that his act

  1. Looking at the offences of Assault, Battery, Actual bodily harm and Grievous really serious ...

    But that, whatever he might be going to do next, and sufficiently immediately for the purposes of the offence was something of a violent nature. In effect, it was wholly open to the justices to infer that her state of mind was not only that of terror, which they did

  2. Property Offences, Corporate Manslaughter and Police Powers of Search and Entry.

    where a service is carried out on the basis that the payment will be made. There was a case where D asked for a taxi driver to take him to a club which was 13 miles away. When D arrived he refused to pay the £15 fare he claimed that the journey was only four miles.

  1. A person who genuinely attempts to commit a criminal offence and fails still deserves ...

    It is my opinion that Geddes was a very dangerous man and the potential damage he would have done had he succeeded would have been devastating to the victim. He had all of the mens rea to go through with his crime and in my opinion deserved to be punished just as much as if he had completed the offence.

  2. How Satisfactory Is The Current Law On The Deception Offences?

    In R v Halai, the defendant made false statements in an application for a mortgage and thereby obtained a survey, the opening of an account and a mortgage advance. Note that the Theft Amendment Act 1996 introduced s.1 (3) specifically to provide that a loan amounts to a service.

  1. Explain the meaning of Actus reus and mens rea

    an outcome but in trying to achieve this commits a different actus reus the malice cannot be transferred as illustrated in R v Pembliton where A intended to scare a crowd by throwing a stone but missed and broke a window thus having the actus reus of Criminal Damage and

  2. Explain what is meant by the term causation in criminal law and assess how ...

    Even though the gunshot wound had almost healed the victim died due to negligent treatment. The negligent treatment must be so independent of Dâs acts, and in itself so potent in causing death, that they regard the contribution made by his acts as insignificant.â The courts will use whichever direction will avoid breaking the chain of causation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work