• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

There are two ways of committing common assault which are assault and battery. Both of there offences are charged under s39 criminal justice act 1988 and summary offences.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

There are two ways of committing common assault which are assault and battery. Both of there offences are charged under s39 criminal justice act 1988 and summary offences. Firstly I am going to look at assault which is known as a technical assault or psychic assault. Assault is when defendant intentionally or subjectively recklessly causes another person to fear immediate unlawful personal violence. For the Actus Reus of assault, you must establish that there has been an act which has caused another person to apprehend the infliction of immediate, unlawful force. An assault requires some acts or word this can be seen in Lodgon v DPP where defendant opened a drawer in his office to show another person that there was a gun in it, which defendant said was loaded. In fact the gun was fake. The actions of defendant were held to amount to an assault. Words are sufficient to amount to an assault which can be seen in Constanza (1997) the CA held that letters can be an assault. In this case defendant had written 800 letters and made a number of phone calls to the victim. The victim interpreted the last two letters as clear threats. ...read more.

Middle

The court held that the officer had committed a battery and the defendant was entitled to free herself. For a battery to be committed the force must be unlawful. Thus a parent who smacks his child, depending on the circumstances of the case, may not be inflicting' unlawful' force. This can be seen in A v UK (1998) where a father who had beaten his son with a garden cane, the ECHR ruled that a law allowing force to be used on children offends art 3 of the ECHR. Nevertheless despite this ruling in England if the force is used to correct a child, then this is lawful. A battery can be through an indirect at which can be seen in Martin (1881) where the defendant placed an iron bar across the doorway of a theatre. He then witched off the lights. In the panic that followed, several of the audience were injured when they were trapped and unable to open the door. We can see that in Martin's case the defendant did not directly cause injury to the audience but did so via other means. A battery may be committed through a continuing ac as in Fagan v Metropolitan Police Commander (1968) ...read more.

Conclusion

Psychiatric injury also classed as 'actual bodily harm'. In the case of Ann, injuries to Ben were more severe than assault and battery as he lost the sight in one eye. there is no additional mens rea requirement for that of Actual bodily harm thus the mens rea for common assault will suffice and althoughtABH is more serios offence, recklessness will suffice, and provide that there is a risk involved it need not to be a serious risk. R v Savage (1991) where a women in a pub threw beer over another woman. in doing this the glass slipped from defendant's hand and the victim's hand was cut by glass. the defendant said that she had only intended to throw beer over her victim. she had not intended her to be injured, nor had realised that there was a risk of injury. held in the HL: the fact that she had intended to throw beer over the women meant that she had intend to apply unlawful force. in the case of Ann and Ben, which is quite similar to the case of R v Savage, Ann did intended some harm to her victim as she tried to punch him but it cant be Actual Bodily Harm because the injuries to Ben were more severe then ABH so now i am going to look at GBH S20 to find out Ann's Criminal liability. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Criminal Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Criminal Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Is the current law on the non-fatal offences against the person satisfactory?

    4 star(s)

    In Mowatt, it was said that the inclusion of "maliciously" in section 18 was superfluous, as the mens rea was provided by the words "with intent". The lack of clarity has led judges to interpret the wording of the offences as widely as possible to incorporate situations that could not have been envisaged at the time of the Act's passing.

  2. Non-Fatal Offences - Notes and Evaluation.

    Many words do not have the same meaning now as they did in 1861 and some words are no longer used or have a specialist legal meaning. An example of this is the word 'malicious', as a layman would define the word as meaning evil or wicked, whereas a lawyer

  1. Property Offences, Corporate Manslaughter and Police Powers of Search and Entry.

    This manslaughter is described as voluntary, since there will have been evidence that the defendant did mean to kill or cause grievous bodily harm. The differences between the others are that voluntary manslaughter is when a murder is committed in the heat of the moment.

  2. The regulations on arrest and detention of offenders under the Police and Criminal Act ...

    or destroyed, the right to inform someone of their arrest may be suspended for up to 36 hours. Nevertheless, it is the custody officer who makes the judgement and despite the custody officer being independent, they will always naturally lean towards favouring the police.

  1. The History and Main Features of Criminal Law in the USA.

    A person is guilty of kidnapping if he/she unlawfully removes another from its residence or business, or if he/she unlawfully confines another for a substantial period in a place of isolation, with any of the following purposes: to hold for ransom or reward, or as a shield or hostage; or

  2. How Satisfactory Is The Current Law On The Deception Offences?

    The decision in this case is more justifiable than DPP vs. Ray. The deception must be the operative cause of the obtaining of property, and this is a question of fact for the jury to decide, requiring proof that the victim would not have acted in the same way had he or she known the truth.

  1. Explain the meaning of Actus reus and mens rea

    by throwing it against a wall that death or GBH would occur. The next type of mens rea is recklessness. This was established in the case of R v Cunningham and is known as subjective recklessness. It is where the defendant takes an unjustifiable risk and is aware that he

  2. Nina runs a burger bar. She puts up a sign in the window saying ...

    However, it is unknown whether Nina truly believes that her burgers are 'the best', but it is likely that she thought they might be untrue or misleading, which is sufficient to constitute for the mens rea of the offence. Furthermore, another aspect of mens rea is it must be shown

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work