• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent does the South Australian legal system guarantee justice?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Humanities - Ryan Lovell Legal Studies Essay To what extent does the South Australian legal system guarantee justice? For the most part, the South Australian legal system guarantees justice, although being vulnerable to human manipulation and corruption. Doctrine of precedent, the process of appeal and the use of a jury ensure that accused individuals are given a fair trial and sentence. The system is built to be impartial, so that regardless of race, religion, or gender individuals will be treated under the same rules. That being said, with more funds available, the defendant in a legal case may be able to hire a better legal team, and reduce their sentence severity. Judges in South Australia use doctrine of precedent to determine a fair sentence based on prior sentences for similar offences. This ensures that an individual receives a sentence relative to what other people are given. ...read more.


The use of a jury in the District and Supreme Court guarantees that any accused individuals will be judged by twelve neutral jurors. This means that the decision as to whether or not an individual is guilty lies on the judgment of twelve people. The twelve jurors are chosen before the trial begins by both attorneys, from a random pool of potential candidates. Voir dire is the name given to this process that ensures bias towards one side of argument is eliminated, or at least balanced.[2] The jury system is used worldwide, and is recognised as being the most just way of deciding whether an individual is guilty or innocent.[3] Members of the jury are not allowed to converse with anyone who is actively involved in the case, except for the judge, tipstaff and associate. This is done in order to ensure that the jury is not confronted with bribery or blackmail. ...read more.


Eugene McGee, a South Australian lawyer, was charged with causing death by dangerous driving, after he hit a cyclist and fled the scene in 2003. McGee, who had many contacts within the field of law, hired a particularly costly legal team, and managed to escape a manslaughter conviction on the lesser charge of ?Driving without due care?. He was fined $3100 and lost his driver?s licence for 12 months, effectively getting away with murder.[5] The Eugene McGee case is a key example in illustrating how financial accessibility conflicts with South Australia?s ?impartial? legal system. That being said, no legal system in the world comes without any flaws, and in order to remove the issue of wealth distorting the system?s impartiality, it would mean removing an individual?s right to choose their own legal representation. Complete justice is almost always achieved through the use of the South Australia?s legal system. Although the system is imperfect due to flaws in its key strongpoint, impartiality, the vast majority of South Australians would agree that it is just. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Outline the rights of a defendant to legal representation and bail

    Unrepresented defendants have the right to have a 'McKenzie friend' in court with them. This person can sit with the defendant, take notes, and offer quiet suggestions, but is not allowed to address the court. This right was established in a case called McKenzie v McKenzie3, but since many courts

  2. What Impact will Formalising Plea Bargaining have on Justice and Equality in the English ...

    The defendant later appealed on the ground that he did not have an open choice in withdrawing his initial plea. The appeal was allowed on the basis that the accused may have understood that the opinions put across were those of the trial judge and therefore may have been deprived of his self-determination of plea.

  1. Describe trial by jury within the English legal system. How effective is trial by ...

    Juries sometimes make extraordinary decisions e.g. Clive Ponting 1985, involving charges on the sinking of the 'Belgrano' during the Falklands war. The judge directed the jury to commit, but they ignored him and acquitted the case. B)The use of a jury is viewed as making the legal system more open.

  2. "The Chamberlain Case highlighted many of the weaknesses in the Australian legal system

    Presumably he felt that white witness Derek Roff would fare better in a white mans court than the right evidence. 3They had the support of their friends, and the church supported them financially yet still the legal system let them down.

  1. Notes on Sentencing in British courts

    o Benefits it prevents re offending, reduces prison population. Extended Sentences o Sec 85 of POCC(S)A 2000 gives sentencing court power to extend sentences for violent or sexual crimes. o The offender is given custodial sentence plus further extended period up to ten years, which they are out on licence.

  2. Conditional Fee Arrangements and Legal Aid

    Each scheme within the legal aid scheme had its own rules on eligibility and some included means and/or merits tests. A means test assesses eligibility on the basis of the applicant's disposable income, which is the money left each week after paying for certain essential living expenses; and sometimes savings.

  1. What justification was there for Socrates' trial, verdict and death sentence?

    negative connotations, including the previous plays, who portrayed him both as 'corrupting a main character and pupil,' and as a Sophist. Some of the ideas in which Sophists believed were considered impious, because they 'made the weaker arguments stronger,' and 'questioned things in the heavens and below the earth.'

  2. The English Court System

    The High Court has three divisions: Chancery, Queen?s Bench and Family. All three divisions hear appeals from other courts, as well as ?first instance? cases. All three divisions have an appellate jurisdiction, which means that they hear appeals from other courts, as well as hearing ?first instance? cases.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work