• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent does the South Australian legal system guarantee justice?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Humanities - Ryan Lovell Legal Studies Essay To what extent does the South Australian legal system guarantee justice? For the most part, the South Australian legal system guarantees justice, although being vulnerable to human manipulation and corruption. Doctrine of precedent, the process of appeal and the use of a jury ensure that accused individuals are given a fair trial and sentence. The system is built to be impartial, so that regardless of race, religion, or gender individuals will be treated under the same rules. That being said, with more funds available, the defendant in a legal case may be able to hire a better legal team, and reduce their sentence severity. Judges in South Australia use doctrine of precedent to determine a fair sentence based on prior sentences for similar offences. This ensures that an individual receives a sentence relative to what other people are given. ...read more.

Middle

The use of a jury in the District and Supreme Court guarantees that any accused individuals will be judged by twelve neutral jurors. This means that the decision as to whether or not an individual is guilty lies on the judgment of twelve people. The twelve jurors are chosen before the trial begins by both attorneys, from a random pool of potential candidates. Voir dire is the name given to this process that ensures bias towards one side of argument is eliminated, or at least balanced.[2] The jury system is used worldwide, and is recognised as being the most just way of deciding whether an individual is guilty or innocent.[3] Members of the jury are not allowed to converse with anyone who is actively involved in the case, except for the judge, tipstaff and associate. This is done in order to ensure that the jury is not confronted with bribery or blackmail. ...read more.

Conclusion

Eugene McGee, a South Australian lawyer, was charged with causing death by dangerous driving, after he hit a cyclist and fled the scene in 2003. McGee, who had many contacts within the field of law, hired a particularly costly legal team, and managed to escape a manslaughter conviction on the lesser charge of ?Driving without due care?. He was fined $3100 and lost his driver?s licence for 12 months, effectively getting away with murder.[5] The Eugene McGee case is a key example in illustrating how financial accessibility conflicts with South Australia?s ?impartial? legal system. That being said, no legal system in the world comes without any flaws, and in order to remove the issue of wealth distorting the system?s impartiality, it would mean removing an individual?s right to choose their own legal representation. Complete justice is almost always achieved through the use of the South Australia?s legal system. Although the system is imperfect due to flaws in its key strongpoint, impartiality, the vast majority of South Australians would agree that it is just. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. What justification was there for Socrates' trial, verdict and death sentence?

    He also did not try to win the case by bringing his family into court, to appeal to the emotional side of the jury. Therefore he did not want to win the case on this argument. Even though there was much dislike of Socrates, already positioned in the minds of

  2. What Impact will Formalising Plea Bargaining have on Justice and Equality in the English ...

    Counsel for the defence and prosecution must both be in attendance. Finally, it was observed that a judge should never specify the sentence he or she is intending to enforce. In R v Dossetter,9 the Court of Appeal cited the passage and observations made by Lord Chief Justice Parker and

  1. I will look at different black theologies and different theories of justice, and attempt ...

    In the quest for justice, there is more emphasis on being liberated than a redistribution of income. The distribution of justice or goods is usually associated with philosophers, whereas the retribution of justice is a more legalistic approach, outlining how to keep everyone in line.

  2. Conditional Fee Arrangements and Legal Aid

    the Legal Services Commission has established a quality mark, so people can make a more informed choice about the legal service providers they use. Whereas previously legal aid in civil cases was available on a demand-led basis, meaning that all cases that met the merits and means tests would be

  1. Describe trial by jury within the English legal system. How effective is trial by ...

    The jury then returned a verdict of guilty, but the defendant conviction was quashed on appeal because of the judge's interference. The judge must also accept the jury verdict, even if he/she does not agree with it. Juries sometimes make extraordinary decisions e.g.

  2. Explain the ranges of sentences available to the judge or magistrate.

    When a specific crime is on the increase or attracted much publicity, then exemplary sentences may be imposed to attempt to prevent that particular crime. In Whitton, concern over the rise of hooliganism at football matches led to an exemplary sentence of life imprisonment for riotous assembly outside a football ground.

  1. Notes on Sentencing in British courts

    o Don't serve their entire sentence. o If less than 4 yrs automatically released after half. o Over 4 yrs released after 2/3 or after 1/2 on licence. o Behaviour in prison determines exact length served unless under 1 yr.

  2. Outline the rights of a defendant to legal representation and bail

    the conviction, the strength of evidence against the defendant and the defendant's character. The court will also consider whether the accused should be kept in custody for their own protection and will not grant bail where the accused is already serving a prison sentence or where there has been insufficient time to obtain information as to the criteria for bail.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work