• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent have policies on law and order eroded civil liberties in the United Kingdom since 1979?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent have policies on law and order eroded civil liberties in the United Kingdom since 1979? Prior to 1979, Law and Order was a surprisingly low political priority. It was certainly not considered a matter of great political importance. However, since 1979, there has been a period of turbulence, rising crime, and industrial unrest. This has created serge in the importance of Law and Order in the UK. Thatcher convinced the people that the UK's society was disordered, and promised to increase spending on Law and Order, despite spending cuts in other political areas. This increase in the importance of Law and Order has generally been seen as a positive change. However, many sceptics have accused some of the policies on Law and Order of eroding the people's civil liberties. To an extent, this accusation has some foundation. For example, in 1984, the government introduced PACE (The 'Police and Criminal Evidence Act). ...read more.

Middle

It has been argued that the Public Order Act has eroded a number of civil liberties. Most significantly, it has clearly eroded the human right of "Freedom of Expression". The Public Order Act has granted police significant power to prevent demonstrations, marches, protests and strikes, all of which are forms of 'Human Expression'. Therefore, it is clear that here civil liberties have been eroded. Furthermore, in 1999, the government introduced a policy that removed the peoples right to trial for burglary and theft. This, very simply, erodes the previously disreputable civil liberty of "Right to Trial". Furthermore, it has been argued to erode the civil right of 'free speech', as well as eroding the previously held concept of "innocent until proven guilty". A further significant policy on Law and Order was created in the year 2000. The government introduced the Football (Disorder) Act. The Act imposed restrictions and constraints on football hooligans, in order to prevent the serious problem of Football Hooliganism of the time. ...read more.

Conclusion

Most significant of these include PACE, The Terrorism Act, and the Crime and Public Protection Act. However, it is important to understand that, even with the introduction of these significant policies and restrictions, civil liberties have only been eroded to an extent. No liberty or right has been entirely restricted or removed altogether. For example, PACE does allow police to stop and search and detain you for questioning. However, presuming you are innocent, you can only be held for 72 hours, and though this may be an inconvenience to you, there is no possible way they could send you to prison without trial (as is the case in many countries outside of the UK). Furthermore, a number of policies have also been introduced that strengthen civil liberties. Most significant of these was the 'Human Rights Act', which strengthens all, peoples basic Human rights. Therefore, in conclusion, civil liberties have been eroded by a number of law and order policies since 1979, but only to a certain extent. Sebastian Cornelius S.H ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Jury (Criminal & Civil Trials)

    4 star(s)

    In the past a unanimous verdict was required. This has been changed so that, if the jury fails to agree after a given period, at the discretion of the judge they may reach a verdict by a 10-2 majority. This was to prevent jury tampering in cases involving organized crime.

  2. Unmarried fathers and their children - has the law got it right?

    It is shocking that with out this parental responsibility order the father cannot even consent to emergency medical treatment. Surely the law has not got it right in relation to unmarried fathers. The Government needs to raise far more awareness about the importance of parental responsibility.

  1. Free essay

    heirachy of civil courts

    They also deal with questions concerning the residence and adoption of children and the giving of permission for persons under 18 to marry where they cannot obtain their parents consent. Domestic proceedings are dealt with in separate branches of the magistrates' court known as the family proceedings court and family

  2. Outline many of the basic elements of law that relate to business and marketing.

    of pay, overtime rates, annual leave terms, and conditions that both employees and employers must abide by.

  1. unit6 end of unit assignment civil litigation

    As they have not responded to the letter of claim we will not be penalized for going straight to issue at part 7 of the claim form, form number N1. (c) IN THE BLANKSHIRE COUNTY COURT Claim Number: BETWEEN: Mr.

  2. Outcome (3): Analyse the provisions relating to the police powers of arrest, search, seizure, ...

    The force used whilst exercising such powers under PACE should be reasonable. Unreasonable force could cause injury to the suspect and raise many issues under article 2 and 3 of the Human Rights Act. As section 3 of the Criminal Law Act 1687 states: ' a person must use such

  1. "The dichotomy between employee and self-employed is being eroded in employment law, so much ...

    In Hillyer v Governors of St Bartholomew's Hospital5, it was held that nurses were not employees when carrying out operating theatre duties, although a more realistic approach was taken in Cassidy v Minister of Health6. Cassidy, however, shows that control by itself was an insufficient test in a modern industrial society.

  2. Should people have a right to privacy?

    The law in the UK states that this is illegal and abuses the RIPA, Glenn Mulcaire who was the private investigater started illegally intercepting mobile phone messages. However, maybe wrongly, police didn?t take action against the News of the World as their main focus was to find Millie Dowler and also because this was only one example of tabloid misconduct.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work