• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent have policies on law and order eroded civil liberties in the United Kingdom since 1979?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent have policies on law and order eroded civil liberties in the United Kingdom since 1979? Prior to 1979, Law and Order was a surprisingly low political priority. It was certainly not considered a matter of great political importance. However, since 1979, there has been a period of turbulence, rising crime, and industrial unrest. This has created serge in the importance of Law and Order in the UK. Thatcher convinced the people that the UK's society was disordered, and promised to increase spending on Law and Order, despite spending cuts in other political areas. This increase in the importance of Law and Order has generally been seen as a positive change. However, many sceptics have accused some of the policies on Law and Order of eroding the people's civil liberties. To an extent, this accusation has some foundation. For example, in 1984, the government introduced PACE (The 'Police and Criminal Evidence Act). ...read more.

Middle

It has been argued that the Public Order Act has eroded a number of civil liberties. Most significantly, it has clearly eroded the human right of "Freedom of Expression". The Public Order Act has granted police significant power to prevent demonstrations, marches, protests and strikes, all of which are forms of 'Human Expression'. Therefore, it is clear that here civil liberties have been eroded. Furthermore, in 1999, the government introduced a policy that removed the peoples right to trial for burglary and theft. This, very simply, erodes the previously disreputable civil liberty of "Right to Trial". Furthermore, it has been argued to erode the civil right of 'free speech', as well as eroding the previously held concept of "innocent until proven guilty". A further significant policy on Law and Order was created in the year 2000. The government introduced the Football (Disorder) Act. The Act imposed restrictions and constraints on football hooligans, in order to prevent the serious problem of Football Hooliganism of the time. ...read more.

Conclusion

Most significant of these include PACE, The Terrorism Act, and the Crime and Public Protection Act. However, it is important to understand that, even with the introduction of these significant policies and restrictions, civil liberties have only been eroded to an extent. No liberty or right has been entirely restricted or removed altogether. For example, PACE does allow police to stop and search and detain you for questioning. However, presuming you are innocent, you can only be held for 72 hours, and though this may be an inconvenience to you, there is no possible way they could send you to prison without trial (as is the case in many countries outside of the UK). Furthermore, a number of policies have also been introduced that strengthen civil liberties. Most significant of these was the 'Human Rights Act', which strengthens all, peoples basic Human rights. Therefore, in conclusion, civil liberties have been eroded by a number of law and order policies since 1979, but only to a certain extent. Sebastian Cornelius S.H ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Jury (Criminal & Civil Trials)

    4 star(s)

    In the past a unanimous verdict was required. This has been changed so that, if the jury fails to agree after a given period, at the discretion of the judge they may reach a verdict by a 10-2 majority. This was to prevent jury tampering in cases involving organized crime.

  2. Unmarried fathers and their children - has the law got it right?

    It is shocking that with out this parental responsibility order the father cannot even consent to emergency medical treatment. Surely the law has not got it right in relation to unmarried fathers. The Government needs to raise far more awareness about the importance of parental responsibility.

  1. Understanding Young People, Law and Order

    Researchers believe these youth may abandon schoolmates in favor of criminal gangs, since membership in a gang earns respect and status in a different manner. In gangs, antisocial behavior and criminal activity earns respect and street credibility. Like society in general, criminal gangs are usually focused on material gain.

  2. Free essay

    heirachy of civil courts

    Magistrates' courts: although these are essentially criminal courts, magistrates also have a civil jurisdiction, e.g. the making of affiliation orders and authorising the recovery of small debts. Their main civil jurisdiction is concerned with domestic proceedings and applications for matrimonial relief such as separation and maintenance orders- see the domestic proceedings and magistrates' court act 1978.

  1. It is not correct to say that the United Kingdom does not have a ...

    A rigid constitution is much that of a written and organized framework for laws such as United States, German, and Japanese constitutions. A flexible constitution is one that may be amended by a simple act of the legislature. In parliamentary system executive is chosen and removed by legislature and there

  2. unit6 end of unit assignment civil litigation

    However, at present there is no protocol for such an action but we should still follow the Protocol Practice Direction, and prior to commencement of proceedings, supply full information regarding the claim, or defence to the claim if it is disputed, and copies of all documentation relied upon in support of that claim (or defence).

  1. The Nature of Law in Society

    In reference to article two of the human rights act it clearly states that  'No one shall be deprived of his life intentionally save in the execution of a sentence of a court following his conviction of a crime for which this penalty is provided by law.' Now even though

  2. Should people have a right to privacy?

    holding a mobile phone that was utilized to look like a Talk Sport branded radio. Irvine successfully sued for ?passing off, namely that nobody has the right to represent his or her goods as the goods of somebody else? 13(David Rose,2002)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work