• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent have policies on law and order eroded civil liberties in the United Kingdom since 1979?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent have policies on law and order eroded civil liberties in the United Kingdom since 1979? Prior to 1979, Law and Order was a surprisingly low political priority. It was certainly not considered a matter of great political importance. However, since 1979, there has been a period of turbulence, rising crime, and industrial unrest. This has created serge in the importance of Law and Order in the UK. Thatcher convinced the people that the UK's society was disordered, and promised to increase spending on Law and Order, despite spending cuts in other political areas. This increase in the importance of Law and Order has generally been seen as a positive change. However, many sceptics have accused some of the policies on Law and Order of eroding the people's civil liberties. To an extent, this accusation has some foundation. For example, in 1984, the government introduced PACE (The 'Police and Criminal Evidence Act). ...read more.

Middle

It has been argued that the Public Order Act has eroded a number of civil liberties. Most significantly, it has clearly eroded the human right of "Freedom of Expression". The Public Order Act has granted police significant power to prevent demonstrations, marches, protests and strikes, all of which are forms of 'Human Expression'. Therefore, it is clear that here civil liberties have been eroded. Furthermore, in 1999, the government introduced a policy that removed the peoples right to trial for burglary and theft. This, very simply, erodes the previously disreputable civil liberty of "Right to Trial". Furthermore, it has been argued to erode the civil right of 'free speech', as well as eroding the previously held concept of "innocent until proven guilty". A further significant policy on Law and Order was created in the year 2000. The government introduced the Football (Disorder) Act. The Act imposed restrictions and constraints on football hooligans, in order to prevent the serious problem of Football Hooliganism of the time. ...read more.

Conclusion

Most significant of these include PACE, The Terrorism Act, and the Crime and Public Protection Act. However, it is important to understand that, even with the introduction of these significant policies and restrictions, civil liberties have only been eroded to an extent. No liberty or right has been entirely restricted or removed altogether. For example, PACE does allow police to stop and search and detain you for questioning. However, presuming you are innocent, you can only be held for 72 hours, and though this may be an inconvenience to you, there is no possible way they could send you to prison without trial (as is the case in many countries outside of the UK). Furthermore, a number of policies have also been introduced that strengthen civil liberties. Most significant of these was the 'Human Rights Act', which strengthens all, peoples basic Human rights. Therefore, in conclusion, civil liberties have been eroded by a number of law and order policies since 1979, but only to a certain extent. Sebastian Cornelius S.H ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Jury (Criminal & Civil Trials)

    4 star(s)

    In the past a unanimous verdict was required. This has been changed so that, if the jury fails to agree after a given period, at the discretion of the judge they may reach a verdict by a 10-2 majority. This was to prevent jury tampering in cases involving organized crime.

  2. Free essay

    heirachy of civil courts

    In civil cases, appeal from magistrates' courts usually lies to a divisional court of the family division of the high court. Superior courts (a) The high court of justice The high court deals with the more serious civil cases, and hears most appeals from the county courts.

  1. "The dichotomy between employee and self-employed is being eroded in employment law, so much ...

    He said in the case: '... under a contract of service, a man is employed as part of the business and his work is done as an integral part of the business but, under a contract for services, his work, although done for the business, is not integrated into it but only accessory to it.'

  2. unit6 end of unit assignment civil litigation

    IN THE BLANKSHIRE COUNTY COURT Claim Number: BETWEEN: Mr. Jason Furlong Claimant and Mr and Mrs Fry Defendant PARTICULARS OF CLAIM 1. On the 15th May 2006 the parties agreed by way of an accepted quotation for the Claimant to carry out catering in connection with the marriage occasion of the defendant's daughter, for the sum of �6723. 2.

  1. Unmarried fathers and their children - has the law got it right?

    Adoption has always been open to both married couples and single people but only one member of an unmarried couple could become the adoptive parent. Their partner could obtain a more limited legal relationship with the adopted child through a residence order.

  2. Outcome (3): Analyse the provisions relating to the police powers of arrest, search, seizure, ...

    force as is reasonable in the circumstances in the prevention of crime, or in effecting or assisting in the lawful arrest of offenders or suspected offenders or of persons unlawfully at large' (Bevan, 1991; 271) If such force is unreasonably used then the arrest could result in being unlawful as

  1. Should people have a right to privacy?

    that exploitation but in the United Kingdom these rights fail to exist. Although such courts in the United Kingdom have lengthened current laws to make quasi-image rights, the UK is still some way from making a self-standing right. In the United Kingdom, people have depended on a framework of intellectual

  2. The Nature of Law in Society

    For example the Nazi's believed that what they did is right yet we judge them. They were dictated into believing that what they were doing is right on the basis that the whole nation was in a moral agreement. When the whole of your society is doing something should you be pressured into doing the same thing?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work