• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent have policies on law and order eroded civil liberties in the United Kingdom since 1979?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent have policies on law and order eroded civil liberties in the United Kingdom since 1979? Prior to 1979, Law and Order was a surprisingly low political priority. It was certainly not considered a matter of great political importance. However, since 1979, there has been a period of turbulence, rising crime, and industrial unrest. This has created serge in the importance of Law and Order in the UK. Thatcher convinced the people that the UK's society was disordered, and promised to increase spending on Law and Order, despite spending cuts in other political areas. This increase in the importance of Law and Order has generally been seen as a positive change. However, many sceptics have accused some of the policies on Law and Order of eroding the people's civil liberties. To an extent, this accusation has some foundation. For example, in 1984, the government introduced PACE (The 'Police and Criminal Evidence Act). ...read more.

Middle

It has been argued that the Public Order Act has eroded a number of civil liberties. Most significantly, it has clearly eroded the human right of "Freedom of Expression". The Public Order Act has granted police significant power to prevent demonstrations, marches, protests and strikes, all of which are forms of 'Human Expression'. Therefore, it is clear that here civil liberties have been eroded. Furthermore, in 1999, the government introduced a policy that removed the peoples right to trial for burglary and theft. This, very simply, erodes the previously disreputable civil liberty of "Right to Trial". Furthermore, it has been argued to erode the civil right of 'free speech', as well as eroding the previously held concept of "innocent until proven guilty". A further significant policy on Law and Order was created in the year 2000. The government introduced the Football (Disorder) Act. The Act imposed restrictions and constraints on football hooligans, in order to prevent the serious problem of Football Hooliganism of the time. ...read more.

Conclusion

Most significant of these include PACE, The Terrorism Act, and the Crime and Public Protection Act. However, it is important to understand that, even with the introduction of these significant policies and restrictions, civil liberties have only been eroded to an extent. No liberty or right has been entirely restricted or removed altogether. For example, PACE does allow police to stop and search and detain you for questioning. However, presuming you are innocent, you can only be held for 72 hours, and though this may be an inconvenience to you, there is no possible way they could send you to prison without trial (as is the case in many countries outside of the UK). Furthermore, a number of policies have also been introduced that strengthen civil liberties. Most significant of these was the 'Human Rights Act', which strengthens all, peoples basic Human rights. Therefore, in conclusion, civil liberties have been eroded by a number of law and order policies since 1979, but only to a certain extent. Sebastian Cornelius S.H ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Jury (Criminal & Civil Trials)

    4 star(s)

    In the past a unanimous verdict was required. This has been changed so that, if the jury fails to agree after a given period, at the discretion of the judge they may reach a verdict by a 10-2 majority. This was to prevent jury tampering in cases involving organized crime.

  2. Unmarried fathers and their children - has the law got it right?

    The Current law in relation to unmarried fathers and their children does not only appear unjust in various places, but it is also quite confusing. Men are considered fathers when it comes to responsibilities such as paying child support, but not when it comes to legal rights.

  1. Understanding Young People, Law and Order

    Researchers believe these youth may abandon schoolmates in favor of criminal gangs, since membership in a gang earns respect and status in a different manner. In gangs, antisocial behavior and criminal activity earns respect and street credibility. Like society in general, criminal gangs are usually focused on material gain.

  2. Outcome (3): Analyse the provisions relating to the police powers of arrest, search, seizure, ...

    a vehicle rather than a person if they have reasonable grounds to believe it has been stolen. However, under the Road Safety Act 1967, which has been incorporated into the Road Traffic Act 1988, a police constable has the power to detain a person in order to carry out a breath test.

  1. Free essay

    heirachy of civil courts

    Cases where the value of the claim is expected to be �15,000 or less (or, in the case of a personal injury claim, less than �50,000) are usually heard in the county court A county court appeal lies from a district judge to a circuit judge and from circuit judge to a high court judge.

  2. "The dichotomy between employee and self-employed is being eroded in employment law, so much ...

    Due to the inadequacies of the control test, the courts looked for another test which would reflect the realities of a modern day employment relationship. In Stevenson, Jordan and Harrison Ltd v Macdonald and Evans7, Denning LJ developed what he called the integration test. He said in the case: '...

  1. The Nature of Law in Society

    with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.

  2. Should people have a right to privacy?

    It will later examine the extent of unlawful conduct within newspaper groups and the police's original phone-hacking investigation? 9(http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11195407 accessed 28/09/11)The fact that phone hacking is against the law leads me onto how the English Legal system dealt with it.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work