• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent is it still true to say that legal justice in England and Wales rests upon adversarialism?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent is it still true to say that legal justice in England and Wales rests upon adversarialism? Introduction In the past, legal justice in England and Wales has rested upon adversarialism a great deal more than today. There have been many changes within the English legal system that seem to have in some way damaged the adversarial process. In this assignment I strive to examine these changes by using examples of adversarialism both being successful and detrimental to the English justice process. As the word justice and adversarial apply to both aspects of law (criminal and civil) then, of course, I will mention the changes in both but the bulk of this essay will be based on the effects within the civil legal system. What do we mean by 'adversarial' and 'justice' within criminal and civil law? The word 'justice' is controversial and takes many definitions within law but in this instance, I will mainly concentrate on how the English legal system uses adversarialism to achieve justice and research to what extent the use of the adversarial process has changed within the fast developing UK legal system. The word 'adversarial' has several meanings but the most plain of these is, "one side against the other."1 Within law, adversarialism is a battle over which side or story is believed. Firstly, there are two approaches for attempting to achieve fairness within the criminal legal system; these are due process and crime control. ...read more.


With the establishment of the county courts in 1846 came a means by which businessmen could recover damages without investing all their time and hard earned money. Towards the latter part of the last century the original Woolf reforms were reestablished but this time they were done so with the intent to increase the work of both the superior and county courts. Already the older trend of using an adversarial approach was slipping away into more modern times. At the beginning of the 20th century there was evidence of more complaints about delays in the civil courts and the ever increasing financial status of litigation. In his report, Lord Woolf estimated that in the 20th century alone there had been approximately 60 different reports concerning the attempt to reform the civil justice system. One of Woolf's arguments was for a 'root' and 'branch'3 review which would lead to a fundamental change within the system unlike many other proposals which had barely affected the civil process. Lord Woolf's Reforms 1995 In the interim report on 'Access to Justice,' Lord Woolf described the problems within the civil justice system as being "interrelated" and "restricted to one particular area".4 Lord Woolf illustrates the new civil system as being based upon 'aggressive adversarialism.' Woolf suggested the following reforms (which seem to have no regard for the adversarial process that has been used for so long) ...read more.


The most significant achievements have been introducing alternative dispute resolutions and also the pre-action protocols9 which, have made it possible to move those cases that can not be settled in these ways through the legal system quickly and effectively. On the other hand there are negative points to Lord Woolf's reforms such as his reform for fixed costs through the fast track reform, which unfortunately did not prove viable. The biggest change that proved fundamental was within the legal aid system which changed to conditional fee arrangements. This means that in personal injury claims, defendants are now liable for the success fees as well as the costs of the claimant's insurance. Conclusion From all the research I have done and from the evidence I have gathered it is my conclusion that although in the past the legal justice system in England and Wales did rest upon adversarialism, since the Woolf reforms and over the last century adversarialism has become a thing of the past and is no longer heavily relied on. As with everything in life the fast changing times bring with them serious changes, even within the most complex legal system. The adversarial approach has by no means been completely erased but new, improved methods of litigation are now being applied and seem to be creating equality and fairness within both the criminal and civil justice system. I have no doubt that within the next century there will be even more reforms and change, and maybe even the total abolishment of adversarialism. Reference list * http://www.dca.gov.uk/middle/report. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Free essay

    Critically discuss whether the criminal courts of England and Wales require substantial reform. Firstly ...

    For example, stealing something as stated in the Theft Act 1968. Also if the conduct can be defined as a criminal conduct in common law then it is criminal conduct, e.g. murder is a common law. So in conclusion when talking about the nature of a crime; it basically means

  2. Alternative Dispute Resolution Essay

    would even know about it, so business could carry on as usual. In court proceding the parties are not in control of anything at all, because strict rules and times are laid down which must be followed, this can allow opinions and important evidence to be unused or overlooked which

  1. Critically evaluate the aims and consequences of sentencing and show how the laws regarding ...

    The court held that they were more intimidating as a group than they would have been as individuals and gave them 8 years custodial sentence. In the recent case of R v. Breeze (2002) EWCA Crim 2541 the court stated that the appellants straight out guilty plea, and her degree

  2. Law and Fault. The fundamental principle of English law is that there is ...

    Here, although an offence has been committed, there is no intention; and because he had no control over his actions, he is not at fault and therefore would not be liable. Furthermore, the principle of fault can be illustrated by the use of special defences.

  1. What Impact will Formalising Plea Bargaining have on Justice and Equality in the English ...

    Judges have to be very cautious in playing any role in plea arrangements; although as a result of the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 must now indicate in court if a reduction in sentence has been granted to a defendant.

  2. Describe how civil disputes can be resolved without going to court (this does not ...

    Arbitration is and has been imposed by judges in the high court and any ruling that becomes of an arbitration process is binding meaning that the parties have to do it. This is not so for the other processes. In conclusion arbitration maybe the most potent and strong method of

  1. Woolf Reforms

    The emphasis of the new rules is on avoiding litigation through pre-trial settlements. Litigation is to be viewed as a last resort, with the court having a continuing obligation to encourage settlement. In order to address the issue of complexity there has been an attempt to write the new rules in plain English, replacing old-fashioned terminology with more accessible terms.

  2. Explain and comment on the main reforms made to the civil justice system after ...

    Lord Woolf described his report as 'a new landscape for the civil justice for the twenty-first century'. Many of the proposals made in his report received support from the senior judiciary, the Law Society, the Bar and consumer organisations and therefore it was expected that many of the proposals would be implemented.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work