• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Using relevant case law explain why the distinction between an invitation to treat and an offer is important in Contract law.

Extracts from this document...


Using relevant case law explain why the distinction between an invitation to treat and an offer is important in Contract law. An 'invitation to treat' is inviting parties to create a contract. It represents the preliminary stage of negotiation. A person making an invitation to treat does not intend to be bound as soon as it is accepted by the person to whom the statement is addressed. An invitation to treat is always a fixed price and a choice; it is not an offer to sell. Newspapers and catalogues are examples of invitations to treat. An 'offer' is defined as a statement of willingness where the person who is making the offer (offeror), promises to be bound in a contract if the terms of the offer are accepted by the person accepting the offer (offeree). An individual or organisation can make an offer to another individual (bilateral) ...read more.


The display of goods on the supermarket's shelves was merely an invitation to customers to make offers to buy. Parties can be invited through advertisements such as magazines or newspapers- Partridge v Crittenden [1968] 1 WLR 1204 QB. This is the famous case in which the plaintiff had put an advertisement in a newspaper for hens. The plaintiff was charged with illegally offering for sale a wild life bird conflicting the Protection of Birds Act 1954. It was held that the advertisement was an invitation to treat rather than an offer for sale,[1]. As a result of this the plaintiff was not guilty of the offence. The principle from Boots cash chemists was also used in Fisher v Bell [1961] 1 QB 394 where a shopkeeper displayed a knife in his window and under the Offensive Weapons Act 1959, it was illegal to offer for sale offensive weapons. ...read more.


Ltd [1893] 1 QB, the defendants sold a smoke ball and put an advertisement in the newspaper claiming they would play �100 to anyone who contracted influenza after using the smoke ball for a specified period. The plaintiff contracted influenza after having purchased and used as directed and claimed the reward. The defendants argued that it was impossible to contract to the whole world, nevertheless this was rejected by the Court of Appeal. The court had identified that for an advertisement to be viewed as an offer, it has to be very specific. In this case there were other implications, for example �1000 was placed in a bank account to show that it was serious, this highlighted the validity of the offer. We see the more specific an advertisement the more likely it is to be seen as an offer. Overall, It is extremely important to distinguish the differences between invitation to treat and offer, if the differences are not recognized the whole meaning and purpose could lead in to a different understanding which is incorrect. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

3 Stars, due to the foregoing.

Marked by teacher Edward Smith 09/07/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    make a contract * Agreement formed when a party accepts an offer made by other, it should be certain and final Type of Contract Termination of Contract * Escape from contract; - mutual / unilateral mistake - Misrepresentation of facts inducing another party - Duress inducing another party - Lack of capacity to contract (infancy, influence of drugs/alcohols/mental illness)

  2. Entores ltd V. Miles Far East Corperation [1955] 2 QB 327(CA)

    time of acceptance is generally the time at which the acceptance is posted. The same principal applies to Dunlop v. Higgins (1848)2 where it was decided that the posting of a letter accepting an offer constitutes a binding contract. In re Imperial Land Co.

  1. Law of Contract - Question and answer.

    According to the Postal Rule, Michelle's acceptance would be deemed valid once the letter is posted by the offeree. The post office, on receipt of the letter acts as an agent of both parties. Even in instances when the letter fails to reach the offeror, the inefficiencies of the post

  2. Contract Law - offer and acceptance.

    As stated above generally invitation to tenders are considered an invitation to treat, however in the case of Harvela Investments Ltd v. Royal Trust of Canada 1985 3 WLR 276, the House of Lords held, an invitation to submit tenders may be equal to an offer where there is a

  1. Critically evaluate what in law will amount to an offer

    Another example of where invitation to treat can be mistaken for an offer is highlighted in the case of Pharmaceutical Society of GB V. Boots cash chemist (1953), whereby Under the pharmacy and poisons act 1933, certain drugs must be sold by a qualified pharmacist.

  2. Ian, an investment broker, wasapproached by Victor who asked him whether he should invest ...

    But if Victor enter into contract affer the resignation then it would be regarded that Ian's statement as a continuing representation which will be falsified by the subsequent events. As such Ian is under a duty to disclose the new facts, With v O' Flanagan (1936)

  1. Evaluate the law of formation of contract in the context of modern methods of ...

    (1955) it suggests that the postal rule does not apply to some methods of instantaneous communication such as telephone and this is supplemented with Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Stahl GmbH (1982) as it stated: ??it would seem?that the communication should take effect at the time when the (offeree)

  2. Law of Contract. With reference to case law, identify and discuss whether the ...

    Thus, in order to avoid objection happen, the post rule has been created as to provide an exception to the usual communication. In the case of Byrne v Van Tienhoven (1880) (Adams, 2012), the defendant sent an offer to the claimant on October 1st.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work