• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Void and voidable Contracts.

Extracts from this document...


Void Contracts: A contract is void if it is worthless, that is, not really a contract at all. Some contracts made by minors, for example, are automatically void. Contracts may be declared void on the basis that they oblige the contracting parties to commit illegal acts. Damages cannot be claimed by a party injured by attempting to comply with a void contract. For example, if I contract to pay someone to shoot a TV game show host, and the would-be murderer decides to take the money and run without satisfying his part of the deal, then the courts will not assist me to recover the money. The illegality need not be as serious as murder for this to be the case. Some contracts may not be strictly void, but can be declared void. The distinction is important because when goods or property are exchanged under a voidable contract, title is passed. With a void contract no title passes, because effectively the contract never existed. Voidable Contracts: Unlike a void contract, whose legal status is as if it never existed, a voidable contract is one that remains in force until it is declared void by one of the contracting parties. ...read more.


She has ordered the display model which she has seen in the shop window offered at a reduced price. A sales assistant confirms the sale with Safina and takes a credit card deposit from her. Unbeknownst to either of them, the sofa has actually been destroyed the previous day, due to not complying with current health and safety regulations. This is known as a common mistake. A common mistake is one when both parties make the same error relating to a fundamental fact. A contract will be void at common law if the subject matter of the agreement is, in fact, res extincta, non-existent. Section 6 of the Sale of Goods Act 1979 provides that: Where there is a contract for the sale of specific goods, and the goods without the knowledge of the sellers have perished at the time when the the contract was made, the contract is void. Therefore, the contract is totally void, and is, as if it never existed. 4. In this case Dan buys a garage from a large oil company. While negotiating the oil company gives Dan an estimate of the profit he should make annually. ...read more.


In the case of Forster v Suggett [1918] it was held that an employer cannot prevent an employee from using his own skill after he has left even if that skill was learnt from the employer. However, if it is an express term of the contract, as it is with Omar, the test of reasonableness is used to determine whether the restraint clause applies in total, or in part, or not at all. The courts try and strike a balance between protecting the goodwill of the employer and allowing the employee to earn a living. The test of reasonableness is applied to duration of the restraint, the radius of it and the scope of it. In the case of Omar, it would be unreasonable to expect him not to work for another firm of architects within Europe or the USA for the next ten years. A reasonable restraint would have been that he could not work for a firm of architects within the West Midlands area for two years following his termination of the contract. This would at least give him the option of working within England to earn a reasonable living. Therefore the clause is not valid and hence renders the contract in question void. Contract Law Assignment 4 Access to Law Mohammed Abdullah ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Law of Contract section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Law of Contract essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "The requirement of consideration is an unnecessary complication in the formation of contracts."

    4 star(s)

    The courts would be reluctant to interfere should both parties had readily agreed to what the subsequent consideration should be, regardless of how trifle its economic value may be. In the past, as shown in the case of White v Bluett [1853], the consideration provided by the claimant should be of some economic value.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Contract Law - Offer And Acceptance

    3 star(s)

    It was held that B's returning of the amended document was not an acceptance but a counter-offer which could be regarded as accepted either when MRC ordered coal or when B actually supplied. By their conduct the parties had indicated their approval of the agreement.

  1. Four ways in which a contract may be discharged.

    Was the loss reasonably foreseeable as liable to result from the breach? This depends upon the state of the defendant's knowledge. Every defendant has imputed to him knowledge of what happens in the ordinary course of things. They may also have actual knowledge of special circumstances.

  2. I have been asked to advise a client on considering contracting with a building ...

    In 1945 the flats were fully let. The claimants demanded a full rent of �2,500 p.a., both retrospectively and for the future. They tested this claim by suing for rent at the full rate for the last two quarter of 1945."(Taken from Common Law 1 BPP)

  1. "There are occasions where terms are implied into contracts which have never been discussed ...

    The ship became grounded at the jetty and broke up on a ridge of rock. The defendants argued that they had given no undertaking as tot h safety of the ship. However the court ruled that there was an implied undertaking that the ship would not be damaged.

  2. Free essay

    Outline how consumers are protected in contracts for the sale of goods, identifying relevant ...

    Any goods supplied during the course of the service should be of satisfactory quality and fit for their purpose. If this is not the case, the consumer is can ask for a repair, replacement or can attempt to claim compensation.

  1. health and safety legislation and regulation

    1. Identify the hazards 2. Decide who might be harmed and how 3. Evaluate the risks and decide on precautions 4. Record your findings and implement them 5. Review your risk assessment and update if necessary It is important to curry out the risk assessment in five step because one of

  2. Economic Loss & Negligent Misstatements questions and answers

    Sven would not be held liable for Erik, Matius or Annika losing money, because the report and advice he gave to Erik was just of a friend, and should not have been taken seriously 1. Friends - Chaudhry v Prabhakar [1988] ? there will be no duty in respect

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work