• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What are the alternative methods of dispute resolution

Extracts from this document...


What are the alternative methods of dispute resolution? Discuss each. Alternative methods of dispute resolution (ADR) are methods of resolving a dispute without resorting to using the courts. The fundamental principles of Alternative Dispute Resolutions are Negotiation, Tribunals, Conciliation, Arbitration and Mediation. Many of these approaches include the use of a neutral individual such as a mediator who can assist disputing parties in resolving their disagreements. The use of these methods helps in bringing justice to all people concerned with civil matters. The most obvious and most cost effective way of resolving disputes is by negotiation. It is where the two parties get together and discuss the points of the matter. Also this way of solving disputes means that the parties involved may remain on talking grounds, which usually benefits everyone concerned. If the matter cannot be solved through informal negotiating then the parties involved can involve solicitors to negotiate a settlement for them. This, however, does mean there will be a cost element but it could eliminate the amount of time taken up, which is what ADR aims for. Although negotiating is simple, its practicality can be questioned, as some matters may take years to resolve and can cost a lot. ...read more.


The use of a conciliator may not necessarily result in a resolution and the matter may have to go to the courts. This kind of method is likely to be used over small matters regarding unfriendly neighbourly activity; such as loud music all day and night. Arbitration is when the parties agree to submit their claims to private arbitration; this is the type of arbitration relevant to alternative dispute resolution, as it is a way of resolving a dispute without the need for a court case. Arbitration is the voluntary submission of the dispute by the parties, to the judgement of some person other than a judge. Such an agreement will usually be in writing. The agreement to go to arbitration can be made by the parties at any time. The Arbitration Act of 1996 states that the parties are free to agree on the number of arbitrators. If the parties cannot agree on a number, the Act provides that only one arbitrator should be appointed. An arbitrator is likely to have specialist knowledge in a particular area and this helps the parties form the grounds on choosing which arbitrator to have. ...read more.


The role of Employment Tribunals is to cover all aspects of work-related disputes; these are the most formal and their procedure is similar to that of courts. Domestic Tribunals are effectively 'in-house' tribunals set up by private bodies, usually for their own internal disciplinary control. Generally there are no formal rules of tribunals and the rules of natural justice apply. The decisions of tribunals can be challenged in court. Whether the matter is about private or corporate matters alternative modes of dispute resolution (ADR) have helped reduce the costs of going to court, so more people can find ways to solve their disputes. Cases can now be dealt with more quickly, which is a credit to ADR. The formalities of court proceedings have been taken away so that citizens do not feel daunted by the prospect of having to go to a court room. Another reason why ADR shows that the courts are not the best means of solving disputes is, that the legal jargon is also taken away in most ADR circumstances making the proceedings easier to follow for those without the legal knowledge; and people are less likely to need the services of a lawyer. Therefore, it can be seen that ADR is a cost-effective, time consuming method to get speedy justice. (1240 words) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is the name given to the process where parties in ...

    5 star(s)

    v Avery clause or the parties may just agree on arbitration when a dispute arises. The parties can agree the number of arbitrators who will hear their dispute. It could be three, two or just one person. The parties will normally appoint someone who is an expert in their particular area of business.

  2. Alternative Dispute Resolution Essay

    In arbitration the parties are free to agree on the number of arbitrators used, however if they don't agree only one is appointed. In commercial cases, however, the head of an appropriate trade will decide on the arbitrator. Also the Institute of arbitration will provide trained arbitrators for respective disputes.

  1. Disputes - Is ADR always more appropriate or does attending court sometimes providing a ...

    Cases are strictly timetabled by the judge and should be heard within 30 weeks of the claim formally being made against the defendant. 7. For the MULTI-TRACKmulti-track, it deals with claims exceeding �15,000, and can be heard by either the County Court or the High Court, depending on the value and the degree of legal complexity of the case.

  2. Describe how civil disputes can be resolved without going to court (this does not ...

    two previously cooperating companies that relationship could be sustained so further business could successfully take place. The potential quickness in the process also would result in business being able to return to normal without loss of revenue. This process is very important to companies, so much so that they incorporate

  1. Court proceedings.

    Added to this list of those debarred from jury service under the Criminal Justice And Public Order Act 1994 (CJPOA 1994) are those on police or court bail. Other categories have the right to be excused jury service if they so wish, including the medical profession, armed forces, MPs and those over 65.

  2. A critical evaluation of labelling theory.

    Therefore labelling theory seems unable to explain every individual case. However labelling theorists warn that state intervention, when an offender is convicted and put through the criminal justice system, can cause more harm than good when their ties to 'normal' society grow weaker and weaker.

  1. The Canadian Justice system towards aboriginal offenders

    The validity of this approach is found with reference to the sentencing provisions of the Criminal Code of Canada, which requires in s.718.2(e) that sentencing judges consider "All available sanctions other than imprisonment that are reasonable under the circumstances...for all offenders with particular attention to the circumstances of aboriginal offenders".38

  2. Describe with the aid of examples, the authorities, representative bodies or persons that exercise ...

    that are usually performed by the Court or by the liquidator under the authority of the Court. * "The initiative in embarking upon the voluntary winding up rests entirely with the company. Moreover, the conduct of the proceedings in a voluntary winding up is placed in the hands of a

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work