• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What justification was there for Socrates' trial, verdict and death sentence?

Extracts from this document...


Q. What justification was there for Socrates' trial, verdict and death sentence? Athens, known for its enthusiasm for new ideas, had gone down in history as a centre of new ideas, and was called the "school of Hellas," which attracted philosophers from near and far. So why was 'the wisest man,' who distributed opinions and ideas put to death? Were his trial, the two charges Socrates was blamed upon, and the resulting verdict justified? Socrates was brought to trial in 399 B.C, by three accusers, and citizens of Athens - Meletus, Anytus and Lycon. The jury in the trial, and the three accusers considered Socrates a sophist, corrupter and a nuisance. They defeated Socrates on two charges, "corrupting the minds of the young," and "believing in supernatural things of his own invention instead of gods recognised by the state,"1and as a result, he was put to death. I believe these two charges were neither justified, nor fair. For the first charge, of corrupting the youth of Athens, as Socrates argued in his defence speech, he never considered himself a teacher, and never charged a fee. In my opinion, the 'pupils' of Socrates were not forced to, but chose to follow Socrates and imitate his ways. ...read more.


Socrates was believed to be the teacher of people who later became traitors to Athens, such as Alcibiades and Critias. Critias was part of the Thirty Tyrants, who terrorised Athens in 404 B.C, just five years before Socrates' trial. During this time, thousands were either executed or banished from the city. Many Athenians chose to flee the city during this time. Socrates did not exile with the democrats, but stayed in the city. This would have been seen as supporting the regime, and hate built up in the eyes of the Athenian citizens, because Socrates had taught this man who created the tragedy. This incident would be prominent in the minds of the jury, and they therefore would have a set dislike for Socrates, and a bias. He also did not suffer at the palms of the thirty Tyrants unlike his principal accuser, Anytus, who lost much of his property when he fled and joined the fight to free the city. This is another reason why Anytus could have brought Socrates to trial. If this is so, the charges were not just, because this was a hidden agenda, which Socrates may not have prepared for. ...read more.


The death penalty was not fair, if the jury were already bias in so many ways, and of the large amount of confliction about the two charges. However, Socrates played into the hands of the jury, by not acting in the way recognised by the court in the duration of his trial. He antagonised them continually through the trial, bringing up memories of how he criticised those while philosophising inside the city, and his reputation. I believe Socrates was a scapegoat for the problems inside Athens. The actual trial itself was legal, but I believe the charges which brought him to trial were merely to cover up a deep hatred for Socrates, as a result of his contacts, and teachings of traitors, and the Peloponnesian War. Even fifty years after Socrates died; nobody had denounced the trial and his death. It find it suspicious that the accusers chose to convict Socrates at this late date - he was seventy, and surely in a few years he would have died of natural causes, and then he would no longer annoy people. 1 Apology, p. 46 2 'A New Apology for Socrates' by I.F. Stone. 3 Socrates - speaking in his trial in 399 B.C, as told by Plato. Elysse Jones 13cl ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    ‘Trial by jury is outdated, expensive and ineffective in ensuring justice’ Analyse arguments for ...

    4 star(s)

    and whilst this is something Auld also recommended should be made into a statutory declaration (Auld, 2001:para8), it is not yet law. If a jury feels a case has not been adequately made by the prosecution or that a law is unjust, they can acquit without explaining their reasons (Davies et al, 1998:212).

  2. ' Is the jury the "...lamp that shows freedom lives"?

    As opposed to a white middle-class judge who may be of the notion that cannabis is still an illegal substance and so should not be administered under any circumstances. They have also acquitted peace campaigners in the Trident ploughshares movement who disabled equipment related to Britain's Trident nuclear force.

  1. Describe trial by jury within the English legal system. How effective is trial by ...

    of their number as foreman, and try to reach a verdict on the case which has been presented to them.

  2. Law and Morals

    legality of it could be viewed as merely reflecting attitudes at the time - that a woman should be allowed to exercise rights over her body. This is an example of the law upholding the moral values of a group in society; however those against it could argue that the law on abortion goes against moral beliefs.

  1. The Death Penalty in Canada. There are many issues surrounding the rebirth of ...

    In this sense, capital punishment is also murder in itself and does not make it justified. In fact, the instatement of capital punishment may make murder more likely as the death penalty lowers the value of human life. Not only does the death penalty not seem to have any effects

  2. Microsoft Antitrust Case Microsoft is a large diversified computer software manufacturer. Microsoft produces ...

    The following Antitrust Law applies to this case: 1. Section 2 of the Antitrust Acts "Every person who shall monopolize, or attempt to monopolize, or combine or conspire with any other person or persons, to monopolize any part of the trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, shall be deemed guilty of a felony."

  1. The Canadian Justice system towards aboriginal offenders

    Various scholars consider these disparities to be so great as to defy any mutual accommodation between aboriginal and Euro- Canadian criminal justice systems. This state of despair has only recently been alleviated by the use of the restorative justice technique of sentencing circles for aboriginal offenders.

  2. Arguing in Favour of the Death Penalty

    There are many good and bad points that opponents to the death penalty bring up, but there are also good and bad points that pro-death penalty believers argue. Opponents of capital punishment believe the death penalty is not beneficial. An eye for an eye makes the world blind(Bohm/Hittel).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work