• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What justification was there for Socrates' trial, verdict and death sentence?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Q. What justification was there for Socrates' trial, verdict and death sentence? Athens, known for its enthusiasm for new ideas, had gone down in history as a centre of new ideas, and was called the "school of Hellas," which attracted philosophers from near and far. So why was 'the wisest man,' who distributed opinions and ideas put to death? Were his trial, the two charges Socrates was blamed upon, and the resulting verdict justified? Socrates was brought to trial in 399 B.C, by three accusers, and citizens of Athens - Meletus, Anytus and Lycon. The jury in the trial, and the three accusers considered Socrates a sophist, corrupter and a nuisance. They defeated Socrates on two charges, "corrupting the minds of the young," and "believing in supernatural things of his own invention instead of gods recognised by the state,"1and as a result, he was put to death. I believe these two charges were neither justified, nor fair. For the first charge, of corrupting the youth of Athens, as Socrates argued in his defence speech, he never considered himself a teacher, and never charged a fee. In my opinion, the 'pupils' of Socrates were not forced to, but chose to follow Socrates and imitate his ways. ...read more.

Middle

Socrates was believed to be the teacher of people who later became traitors to Athens, such as Alcibiades and Critias. Critias was part of the Thirty Tyrants, who terrorised Athens in 404 B.C, just five years before Socrates' trial. During this time, thousands were either executed or banished from the city. Many Athenians chose to flee the city during this time. Socrates did not exile with the democrats, but stayed in the city. This would have been seen as supporting the regime, and hate built up in the eyes of the Athenian citizens, because Socrates had taught this man who created the tragedy. This incident would be prominent in the minds of the jury, and they therefore would have a set dislike for Socrates, and a bias. He also did not suffer at the palms of the thirty Tyrants unlike his principal accuser, Anytus, who lost much of his property when he fled and joined the fight to free the city. This is another reason why Anytus could have brought Socrates to trial. If this is so, the charges were not just, because this was a hidden agenda, which Socrates may not have prepared for. ...read more.

Conclusion

The death penalty was not fair, if the jury were already bias in so many ways, and of the large amount of confliction about the two charges. However, Socrates played into the hands of the jury, by not acting in the way recognised by the court in the duration of his trial. He antagonised them continually through the trial, bringing up memories of how he criticised those while philosophising inside the city, and his reputation. I believe Socrates was a scapegoat for the problems inside Athens. The actual trial itself was legal, but I believe the charges which brought him to trial were merely to cover up a deep hatred for Socrates, as a result of his contacts, and teachings of traitors, and the Peloponnesian War. Even fifty years after Socrates died; nobody had denounced the trial and his death. It find it suspicious that the accusers chose to convict Socrates at this late date - he was seventy, and surely in a few years he would have died of natural causes, and then he would no longer annoy people. 1 Apology, p. 46 2 'A New Apology for Socrates' by I.F. Stone. 3 Socrates - speaking in his trial in 399 B.C, as told by Plato. Elysse Jones 13cl ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    ‘Trial by jury is outdated, expensive and ineffective in ensuring justice’ Analyse arguments for ...

    4 star(s)

    The symbolic function of the jury is key to legitimising the criminal justice system - it keeps the state from having an absolute power over the actions of its citizens and ensures a confidence in the adversarial system of justice (Sanders, 1997:1051, Sanders & Young, 2000:559).

  2. The Death Penalty in Canada. There are many issues surrounding the rebirth of ...

    On a large scale, maybe there is not really a wonder why Canada has a much lower amount of crime than the U.S. Some use the argument that the lethal injection death penalty is a humane way of carrying out capital punishment; however other forms of killing such as hanging, shooting, electrocution and gas chambers are still legaliv.

  1. Law and Morals

    These issues are the part of the 'circle of law' that is not strictly controlled by morality. However, issues such as abortion, which was legalised in the Abortion Act 1967, play an integral part in legal and moral issues. While it can be argued that abortion is morally wrong, the

  2. Law and Morals

    Hart who was influenced by Mill's theories supported the report's approach stating that legal enforcement of a moral code was unnecessary and morally unacceptable as it interferes with individual liberty.

  1. Microsoft Antitrust Case Microsoft is a large diversified computer software manufacturer. Microsoft produces ...

    Consumer hare or attempted harm is necessary for an antitrust violation. The affected consumer group may be present or future. Consumers may lose directly from high prices or indirectly through a limitation of choices of variety and quality or by a retardation of the innovation process.

  2. Describe trial by jury within the English legal system. How effective is trial by ...

    This also includes anyone who has performed jury service in the previous two years, or has been excused for life by a judge. Other people may be excused on request. These include students sitting exams, mums with young children, people who have certain disabilities (blind and deaf)

  1. The Canadian Justice system towards aboriginal offenders

    The sentencing circle joins the members of a conventional sentencing hearing, such as the accused, the judge, and council, with others normally excluded from the process such as the victim of the offence, aboriginal Elders, and the relevant community. All members of the circle are deemed to have equal importance

  2. Arguing in Favour of the Death Penalty

    An eye for an eye makes the world blind(Bohm/Hittel). We execute those who commit these atrocious crimes so that they do not have the chance to kill again. Dr. Robert Blecker argues that the death penalty is necessary for punishing the worst criminals (Hittel). Heinous crimes seem to be no big deal and no shocking occurrence, in today?s society.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work