• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"While an unwritten constitution has the merit of flexibility, this flexibility is purchased at the expense of individual rights." - Discuss

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question: "While an unwritten constitution has the merit of flexibility, this flexibility is purchased at the expense of individual rights." The United Kingdom has acquired for itself an unwritten constitution. The body of rules relating to the structure, functions and powers of the organ of state, their relationship to one another and to private citizens is to be derived from common law, statutes and constitutional conventions. It is therefore learnt that the English constitution does not impose limits on what may be done by ordinary legislation in the way that many other constitutions do. The constitution adapts for itself a flexible system of governing. The legislative competence of the Uk Parliament is unlimited and therefore the law states that no Parliament can bind its successors or be bound by its predecessors. It also states that the courts cannot question the validity of an Act of Parliament. Therefore, no formal mechanism exists ensuring that the rights of the minorities and individual citizens are not infringed by Parliament. ...read more.

Middle

The Labour government of the UK constitution promised a "Freedom of Information Act" which will lay out the scheme "Your Right to Know" on white paper thus representing a strong assult upon official secrecy allowing more rights to be extended to individuals. It could also be pointed out that the freedom of the media is in any event hampered by the laws of the libel, contempt, official secrets and particularly by the action for breach of confidence as seen in the case Attorney General v Newspaper Publishing plc (1987). The use of an interim injunction to preserve confidentiality combined with the extension of the law of contempt represented the most worry curb on the media's freedom. Traditionally,the operation of a free and diverse press has offered a further check to government power but without a Freedom of Information Act, the press is dependant on a system of official and unofficial "leaks". There is a "danger" that certain organs of the press will merely peddle up in different form to suit the different markets. ...read more.

Conclusion

This problem has however been addressed through the enactment of the Human Rights Act 1998. Litigants will now be able to assert their convention rights against any public authority in any and every UK courts and tribunals. The HRA will make it unlawful for a public authority to do ant act which is incompatible with the convention rights, unless legislation unambiguously mandates or authorizes such actions. (Section6). All Legislation will have to be read so far as possible to compatible with the convention rights. There is no doubt that this act will therefore represent a very real and substantial limitation upon Executive (Parliamentary) action. In conclusion, while it may be argued that many of the traditional means of curbing government power and parliamentary sovereignty may seem ineffective in a flexible form of constitution like the UK, the Human Rights Act and the EC Act will likely constitute a new and powerful guarantee against an oppressive form of government where flexibility is "purchased" at the expense of individual rights. The objects to the un-entrenched British Constitution will however be practically evident only with a new constitution. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. "In form, the Human Rights Act (HRA) is compatible with parliamentary sovereignty. In practice, ...

    Lord Woolf (2002) recognised that the HRA was criticised due to the suggestion that it interferes with the sovereignty of Parliament. But he commended the skilful way in which it has been crafted, for "it provides very substantial protection for human rights without undermining those fundamental constitutional principles".

  2. Discuss whether incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights into the domestic legislation ...

    In the case of Hunt v Hackney LBC [2002]15 As the court "rejected an argument that the principle of EU law that EU law prevails over inconsistent laws of member states had been incorporated into English law by virtue of sections 2(1), (4)

  1. How has the European Court of Human Rights contributed to the protection of children's ...

    This approach implies that reasonable parental measures against child's will, denying him autonomy, do not breach his privacy right. Bainham47 argues that Court's fitting of child's interests into balancing exercise fails to empower them with Art. 8 rights as such, regardless how much weight is attached to their welfare.

  2. Evaluate the extent to which the Human Right Act 1998 is consistent with the ...

    and the Court must disapply United Kingdom legislation if it conflicts with Community law.14 The Human Rights Act 1998 maintains legislative sovereignty as a matter of form, by empowering the upper courts to disapply an Act of the Parliament, which is incompatible with the Convention Right.

  1. Should Britain have a codified constitution?

    An example of this is Blair's reform of the House of the Lords. He was able to completely change half of our legislature without a referendum or other means of checking consensus. A written constitution would act as a safeguard as it would make it difficult to change.

  2. Are the Human Rights Act 1998 and the doctrine of Parliamentary supremacy compatible?

    The Council of Europe developed the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in 1950, of which the UK was one of the first signatories, but, despite supporting the Convention, the UK did not incorporate its principles into UK law.

  1. Can the Islamic approach to Human Rights be compatible withthe current International Human Rights ...

    Therefore, it could be assumed that those human rights listed in the universal declaration describe everyone in the same position, definitely regardless any kind of distinction as it is emphasised in the article two of it. In other words, men and women universally have been recognised in the common standard

  2. Should people have a right to privacy?

    personalities to control and exploit their names and images around the world? Is there any right to privacy in this case? In England, fundamentally it is the right of an individual to monitor the commercial use of his or her name and image and the right to receive payment from

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work