• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why are there different opinions on legislation of illegal land use?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why are there different opinions on legislation of illegal land use? I have been asked to compare contrasting views on an important issue or subject. I have decided to compare two newspaper articles, because the opinions in the newspaper can reach millions of people, being still popular news medium. They influence the way we think, and are therefore very important. I have chosen articles about the issues of squatters, people who illegally build on land that is not theirs, and will look at the way they effect our society and our lives, and whether they should be allowed to continue, or whether possible future government ruling to eliminate this problem should be taken. I have chosen to compare the way the articles where written in the telegraph, with how they where written in the observer. Although these newspapers are similar, they offer surprisingly contrasting viewpoints. My aim is to find out whether we have considered all the facts in the issue as a nation, before being judgemental on this group of people who still deserve a fair trail. ...read more.

Middle

The telegraph is a broadsheet newspaper, and like most papers is run with the purpose of selling issues and making money. In the case of this story, it has probably tried to appeal to the rural section of the public. It directly refers to them in the article, as being the one affected, and tries to sympathise with the losses of money and land they may suffer if the ruling is not passed. The observer, however, supports the gypsies, though this would not make a boost in profit. It is likely that it supports more noble causes then the telegraph, and pays more heed for human rights then for money. I can see that both papers are in some way biased. In the telegraph, it uses emotive language such as "special privileges enjoyed by travellers", making the reader believe that gypsies get an unfair advantage over others. The observer uses bias in the opposite direction, calling the motion an "outspoken attack" and "exploit(ing) rural anger". My personal opinion is that the movement should not be passed, for a number of reasons. ...read more.

Conclusion

The biggest problem is that the Tory party is attempting to make a tour de force and impress the public for an election, rather then make the right decision. As a result of this, I can see that it is likely for many travellers to lose their right to stay where they are as the human rights legislation changes, however, the labour party, who defend the human rights law, will probably stop the changes from being made. In my opinion, I think this issue helps us to better understand the effects that newspaper reporting can have on the attitudes within the government and eventually the everyday lives of 1000s of people. By comparing the telegraph with the observer, I have found that different papers withy different motives can often produce very different stories on one issue, and that it is only by reading different papers can we be sure of a fair and unbiased viewpoint. I can now see more clearly how the media can affect my, and ultimately that of a government, thinking and understanding of a certain issue. In the future, I intend to find more sources to help me understand the facts surrounding an issue before deciding whether I support or condemn an action or change. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sources of Law section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sources of Law essays

  1. "The main aims of the Land Registration Acts were to give certainty to title ...

    In Re Chowood's Registered Land (1933)65 rectification gave effect to an overriding interest that already existed, as a new situation didn't arise from the rectification, no indemnity was payable. Indemnity is specifically excluded by statute in a number of situations, for example a claim for legal costs incurred without the Registrars consent is excluded under S.83(5)

  2. To what extent do you think these aims have been (or will be) facilitated ...

    An overreaching conveyance allows the vendor of an estate that is responsible to equitable interests and charges, to convey it to another without such interests or charges, which are removed from the land to the purchase money12. These interests are identified as 'family interests' and are separated from the 'commercial

  1. The Land Registration Act 2002 heralds major changes to the law and procedures regarding ...

    and Markfield Investment Ltd v Evans7 are among the cases which visualize how the squatters can easily declared as the owner of the owned land by only established the prerequisite of 12 years occupation on the land when the case was brought before the court.

  2. Advice on an incident concerning Land Registration.

    Alf is unable to use the method of overreaching to take free of Deirdre's beneficial interests since there is only one trustee. It would therefore be necessary for him to ask Ben to nominate a second trustee in order to ensure that he is not bound by third-party interests.

  1. DELEGATED LEGISLATION

    highly unsatisfactory." The Delegated Powers Select Committee scrutinises Bills for inappropriate grant of power or legislation with inappropriate delegation (a Lords committee only), there have been no skeleton Bills since it was set up. The Commons Deregulation Committee and the Lords Select Committee on the Scrutiny of Delegated Powers consider

  2. A number of views have been expressed that 'marriage' between two heterosexual couples is ...

    A.D.T challenged both his conviction and the statute itself before the ECHR. The court had no trouble in finding a violation of Article 8 (private life) and did not even find it necessary to consider the fact that statutes discriminated on the basis of 'sexual orientation', by not applying the same rule to male-female or female-female activity.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work