• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why do a high proportion of suspects not receive legal advice at the police station?

Extracts from this document...


Why do a high proportion of suspects not receive legal advice at the police station? A considerable number of studies have been conducted at different police stations which has produced information identifying a range of factors which are involved in the result of suspects not receiving legal advice at the police station. Prior to the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, access to legal advice was overseen by the Judges' Rules, these had no specific power of enforcement, thus allowing the police to employ them arbitrarily. The police did not have to make records of the requests for advice, so how do we know that prior to PACE the proportion of suspects receiving legal advice was low? We can gain an idea from studying the research data in this field.1 Softley's study of four police stations in 1980 shows there was not only a very low proportion of suspects seeking legal advice (9%) but the number receiving even it was even lower (7%). An earlier study by Zanders in 1972 produced different results finding that it was closer to half of all of suspects interviewed requesting access to a lawyer.2 At this time the police did not have to inform the suspects of their rights and it is held that this is the main reason ...read more.


to stop suspects exercising their rights at the police station, thus accounting for a large proportion of cases where detainees do not receive legal advice. There are, however, reason that explain the request rates for legal advice which do not rest entirely on the police's assistance or hindrance. Brown et al.'s study in 1992 suggests that suspects request neither to see nor speak to solicitor 'because they are not informed (wholly or partly) of their rights'.11 If a suspect is not informed of their rights it is acceptable to say most will be ignorant of their entitlement to legal advice. Even if suspects were partly informed the likelihood of the detainee questioning the police to reiterate their rights is low, as 'most will be frightened and apprehensive' being held involuntarily in unfamiliar surroundings.12 This leads on to another influencing factor; suspects being desperate to leave the police station. The thought of delaying their departure to wait for a solicitor to arrive, it seems, plays a major part in the number declining legal advice.13 Sanders et al. found numerous different responses from detainees when an officer asked if they wanted a solicitor, including, 'well it depends how long I'm here for..', which displays how unsure suspects can be feeling at the time of interviewing, they believe that ...read more.


them to intervene or to raise some objection', also their was cases of the solicitor acting almost as a third interviewer.21 Not only this but there are cases where confession is encouraged by solicitors over the phone and in the interview room. Also there are cases when junior members of the legal profession are employed to mete out advice even though their experience is unmatched to that of a police officer.22 These actions of the legal profession are likely to deter suspects from accepting legal advice when they weigh up the cost and benefits. Suspects should be encouraged to contact their own solicitor, should they have one, so they are dealing with a familiar person. In conclusion, it is evident that there are a broad range of reasons why suspects do not receive legal advice at police stations. These range from individual detainee's viewpoints to unlawful police practices. However, it is true that the number of suspects receiving advice has risen considerably since the introduction of PACE, as well as introducing further guidelines to prevent police from 'getting around' the rules, the question that should be posed is, 'Does every suspect actually need advice?'. As long as suspects are making informed decisions there are certainly plenty of cases where advice is not in their best interests. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. Conditional Fee Arrangements and Legal Aid

    Each scheme within the legal aid scheme had its own rules on eligibility and some included means and/or merits tests. A means test assesses eligibility on the basis of the applicant's disposable income, which is the money left each week after paying for certain essential living expenses; and sometimes savings.

  2. Woolf Reforms

    Lord Woolf hoped that the change in language would help to be open and fair according the overriding objective and the new rules. Complexity is also reduced by there being only one set of rules and only one claim form, replacing the writ for the High Court and the summons for the County Court.

  1. Describe the powers of the police to detain, interview and search at the police ...

    In addition, the detainee must be allowed to speak for a reasonable length of time."

  2. To what extent is it still true to say that legal justice in England ...

    policing and questioning processes seem to be controversial to the due process guidelines. On the other side, in Japan, there is a 99.9% conviction rate from using a crime control method, although these statistics are impressive, one can only imagine the number of injustices caused.

  1. If you were a suspect being questioned in a police station, which of your ...

    This leaves room for the judge to use his subjective opinions to consciously or unconsciously persuade the jury that the silence could be due to guilt. Guilt can be inferred from the defendant's failure to provide explanations for the proximity to the scene of the crime under section 37.

  2. I will look at different black theologies and different theories of justice, and attempt ...

    He realized that there was a strong link between racism and capitalism, two forms of oppression that were both part of the same package that the black power and black theology movements were opposing. Unlike others who were more concerned with opposing the current system then creating a new vision,

  1. Explain the role of the CCRC (Criminal Cases Review Commission)

    Eventually, in 1993 the then Home Secretary Michael Howard granted Bentley a partial pardon, saying it was clear he should never have been hanged but he remained guilty of taking part in the murder. In 1998 the Appeal Court quashed Bentley's conviction after going to the CCRC on the grounds

  2. Expert Testimony and Its Value In the Justice System

    In this case the ramifications of the unreliable expert evidence were extreme. The evidence led to Clark being convicted to life imprisonment of which she served over three years before finally being released on her second appeal on the 29th of January 2003[21].

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work