• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why do a high proportion of suspects not receive legal advice at the police station?

Extracts from this document...


Why do a high proportion of suspects not receive legal advice at the police station? A considerable number of studies have been conducted at different police stations which has produced information identifying a range of factors which are involved in the result of suspects not receiving legal advice at the police station. Prior to the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, access to legal advice was overseen by the Judges' Rules, these had no specific power of enforcement, thus allowing the police to employ them arbitrarily. The police did not have to make records of the requests for advice, so how do we know that prior to PACE the proportion of suspects receiving legal advice was low? We can gain an idea from studying the research data in this field.1 Softley's study of four police stations in 1980 shows there was not only a very low proportion of suspects seeking legal advice (9%) but the number receiving even it was even lower (7%). An earlier study by Zanders in 1972 produced different results finding that it was closer to half of all of suspects interviewed requesting access to a lawyer.2 At this time the police did not have to inform the suspects of their rights and it is held that this is the main reason ...read more.


to stop suspects exercising their rights at the police station, thus accounting for a large proportion of cases where detainees do not receive legal advice. There are, however, reason that explain the request rates for legal advice which do not rest entirely on the police's assistance or hindrance. Brown et al.'s study in 1992 suggests that suspects request neither to see nor speak to solicitor 'because they are not informed (wholly or partly) of their rights'.11 If a suspect is not informed of their rights it is acceptable to say most will be ignorant of their entitlement to legal advice. Even if suspects were partly informed the likelihood of the detainee questioning the police to reiterate their rights is low, as 'most will be frightened and apprehensive' being held involuntarily in unfamiliar surroundings.12 This leads on to another influencing factor; suspects being desperate to leave the police station. The thought of delaying their departure to wait for a solicitor to arrive, it seems, plays a major part in the number declining legal advice.13 Sanders et al. found numerous different responses from detainees when an officer asked if they wanted a solicitor, including, 'well it depends how long I'm here for..', which displays how unsure suspects can be feeling at the time of interviewing, they believe that ...read more.


them to intervene or to raise some objection', also their was cases of the solicitor acting almost as a third interviewer.21 Not only this but there are cases where confession is encouraged by solicitors over the phone and in the interview room. Also there are cases when junior members of the legal profession are employed to mete out advice even though their experience is unmatched to that of a police officer.22 These actions of the legal profession are likely to deter suspects from accepting legal advice when they weigh up the cost and benefits. Suspects should be encouraged to contact their own solicitor, should they have one, so they are dealing with a familiar person. In conclusion, it is evident that there are a broad range of reasons why suspects do not receive legal advice at police stations. These range from individual detainee's viewpoints to unlawful police practices. However, it is true that the number of suspects receiving advice has risen considerably since the introduction of PACE, as well as introducing further guidelines to prevent police from 'getting around' the rules, the question that should be posed is, 'Does every suspect actually need advice?'. As long as suspects are making informed decisions there are certainly plenty of cases where advice is not in their best interests. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. What Impact will Formalising Plea Bargaining have on Justice and Equality in the English ...

    of charge in return for a plea of guilty should be encouraged to take place as early as possible. These recommendations were widely reported in the press as an indication of the introduction of an American style system of plea bargaining.

  2. Woolf Reforms

    both parties to use an alternative dispute resolution procedure and facilitating the use of that procedure. The parties will have to show that they genuinely attempted to resolve their dispute through ADR and are not just after a court hearing, as has been the tendency in the past.

  1. To what extent is it still true to say that legal justice in England ...

    The civil justice system Civil justice is fundamentally concerned with the resolution of disputes, this type of system includes all the ways in which people can lawfully resolve disputes and implement their rights and obligations. There has been and still is a need for reform of the civil justice system,

  2. Conditional Fee Arrangements and Legal Aid

    The system of state-funded help in this country goes back almost half a century. The legal aid scheme was designed to allow poorer people access to legal advice and representation in court. The system developed into six schemes, covering most types of case, and administered by the Legal Aid Board.

  1. The Canadian Justice system towards aboriginal offenders

    The discrepancies between aboriginal and Euro- Canadian conceptions of justice reveal that a system which strives to exclusively punish the offender while minimizing community involvement is unlikely to curb aboriginal criminality. The sentencing provisions utilized in the Canadian criminal justice system provide no deterrence for aboriginal offenders as punishment is

  2. Describe the powers of the police to detain, interview and search at the police ...

    In addition, the detainee must be allowed to speak for a reasonable length of time."

  1. Expert Testimony and Its Value In the Justice System

    The downside to such a method is that it is extremely difficult for traits such as knowledge to be measured in an objective manner. Due to this if an objective test was implemented then people who have more than sufficient knowledge and ability to stand as an expert witness could

  2. Explain the role of the CCRC (Criminal Cases Review Commission)

    For them, they thought they have their men. The trial rested on two pieces or evidence, the forensic test, and a confession which one of the men had made to the police. But although there were many people who said they could have identified the suspects, they did not do so.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work