• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) created?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Why was the CPS created? The obligations of the crown prosecution service (CPS) before 2000 was to instruct independent counsel (barristers) to prosecute cases in the Crown Court and other higher courts. After changes were brought by Access to Justice Act 1999 solicitors who are employed lawyers who have the right qualification could now be able to appear in the Crown court and the higher courts. The Prosecution of Offences Act 1985 created the CPS, which only came into being in 1996. The Crown prosecution services have the responsibility of prosecuting people who have been charged with a criminal offence in England and Wales. The CPS is headed by under the supervision of an Attorney General the Director of Public Prosecution (DPP). It is an independent body that works with the police, the courts, the home office, the ministry of justice as well as other agencies that are in the criminal justice system such as the RSPCA. Each year the CPS will have to deal with more than a million cases in the Magistrates court and around 130,000 cases in the Crown court, to deal with this there is around 8,775 staff that are employed by the CPS which is spilt into 3 different groups which are the prosecutors, paralegals and the administrators. ...read more.


Thirdly that there could be a potential infringement of a right to a fair trial, as the police were involved with the investigations they had been tampering with evidence to help win cases, this meant that there were several miscarriages of justice when it came to the prosecution. The report only fuelled the criticisms on the police?s control over the prosecutions. In 1978 the Government decided that they wanted to address the problem so they set up a committee that was to investigate the prosecution process. The committee was called the Royal Commission on Criminal Procedure and was chaired by Sir Cyril Phillips. The committees Phillips report was ytyyyyythen presented to the Government in 1981. One of the thing that committee had found out was that too many trials were being halted at the end of the prosecution presentations of the case in court. This was because the evidence for the prosecution wasn?t sufficient enough to prosecute which led to lots of judge directed acquittals. The commission then stated that they thought that the CPS should have seen beforehand that those cases were going to fail because of the lack of evidence, and then when they had chosen to proceed it was a waste of money and the police?s time. ...read more.


That the CPS should be under the control of a Chief Crown Prosecutor who would be given freedom and own budget from the central control. The CPS would take over the cases after police had charged the person, and then they would arrange the initial magistrates court hearings and the witnesses. The decision would be made by the CPS in deciding whether or not to prosecute or charge a suspect, however before this the police would make the decision. Another recommendation was that the Criminal Justice Units (CJU) would be established to deal with many of the cases in their entirety; these units would be made up of the police, administrative staff i.e. the caseworkers and the CPS lawyers. Another would be that the section called the Central Casework would deal with the more serious cases and they would be given any additional staff resources that they needed. Yet another recomendation was that a CPS lawyer should be allocated to each Crown court. The report was soon accepted which led the Government to act swiftly on Glidewell recommendations. His recommendation on having the CPS in 42 areas was implemented and has been spilt into numerous branches with each branch headed by a Branch Crown Prosecutor. This system seemed to be working more efficiently as Sir Iain Glidewell had predicted as 70%-80% of criminal cases that were dealt by the CPS resulted in a conviction in 2008 to 2009 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Machinery of Justice section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Machinery of Justice essays

  1. "If the Constitution is the source of governmental power, and the judiciary interprets the ...

    Brown as Bowles points out remained largely un-enforced until the Civil rights and Voting rights acts of 1964 and 1965 respectively when congress finally acted on segregation. It is questionable whether, without Brown, Congress would have acted at all. It is difficult however to find evidence of this 'check' on

  2. Court Structure

    To heal appeals against acquittals on a point of law in the Crown Court. f. To review cases referred by the Attorney-General on the grounds that the Crown Court sentence was too lenient. 4. The Judicial Committee of the House of Lords.

  1. The Canadian Justice system towards aboriginal offenders

    The changed physical setting combined with a reduced emphasis on the hierarchical nature of conventional court provides the necessary foundation for a meaningful sentencing circle. The extent to which true restitution can flourish within the sentencing circle depends upon the participation of vital members of the community.

  2. As the juvenile courts converge procedurally and substantively with the adult criminal courts, does ...

    Over the last ten years, the current debate regarding building additional facilities to warehouse violent juvenile offenders has been both highlighted and sensationalized by the media. This has resulted in increasing pressure upon legislatures throughout the nation to "get tough on juvenile crime."

  1. 'Justice requires that prosecutions should be undertaken by a body which is fully independent ...

    and the current system prevented a consistent national prosecution policy. As a result of these findings, the RCCP recommended the establishment of a Crown Prosecution Service, which was later set up under the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985, and is headed by the Director of Public Prosecutions (currently Ken McDonald),

  2. a) Explain the function of the CPS [14] b) evalate the effectiveness of the ...

    This was a miscarriage of justice where 6 men were accused of killing 21 people and injuring 162. It was when IRA bombs exploded in two crowded pubs in Birmingham. They were accused of being part of this and the police looked to have done things to fix the evidence but doctoring the notes after the interview had been concluded.

  1. Expert Testimony and Its Value In the Justice System

    obvious issue with this aspect of the law is that it only covers evidence which is provided by the prosecution. Therefore if the court believes that any evidence provided by the defence may have an ?...adverse effect on the fairness of...? proceedings then it has no right to omit the evidence.

  2. Explain the role of the CCRC (Criminal Cases Review Commission)

    said: 'we have no doubt that these convictions were both safe and satisfactory.' Then in 1990 the Home Secretary referred the case back to the Court of Appeal. At that point there was a new system which then proved the police had tampered with the evidence, and therefore the new evidence meant the men we set free.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work