• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16

Although everyone who gambles at all probably tries to make a quick mental marginal analysis of the game, in depth analysis of the figures shall reveal how a rational player reacts to better odds, or a lower entry price, or a higher potential payout.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Introduction

        Although everyone who gambles at all probably tries to make a quick mental marginal analysis of the game, in depth analysis of the figures shall reveal how a rational player reacts to better odds, or a lower entry price, or a higher potential payout.  I also think it’s important to know at least a little bit about the gambling industry, seeing as it nets $6.3 billionimage00.png a year in revenue in Canada while net annual revenue from alcohol and tobacco sales in Canada is $5.9 billionimage01.png.  When searching for the relationship between Entry Price (E) into a game, the odds of winning that game (O), and the payout of the game (P), one must look at different games that incorporate these three variables.  There are three cases to be examined: Case 1 can be represented by a lottery, where E is set, and both O and P are known and the player tries to match numbers.  Case 2 can be represented by a simple game of chance, which is used in The St. Petersberg Paradox, where E is constant, but O is not set, therefore P is infinite.  Case 3 can be represented by a draw, where E is set, and both O and P are known.  A process of linear regression will be used to determine the actual relationship between P and O for each game.

Analysis

Case 1

                The lottery chosen is from Ontario, lotto 649.

...read more.

Middle

Table 5: Data for Case 3

Prize Value ($)

Number of Prizes

Odds of Winning

10 000

5

1/44 400

5 000

10

1/22 200

1 000

25

1/8 880

500

125

1/1 776

250

500

1/444

200

3015

1/73.631840796

150

5365

1/41.3793103448

But all of the prizes shall be included when calculating the expected value (except the values of all of the cars shall be added together for presentational purposes) thus expected value = image41.png

+image42.png+

image43.png+image44.png+

image45.png = -$66.6499414414

The odds of winning anything are

image46.png

Payoff is inversely proportional to the Odds of winning, as shown below:  Fig. 3:

Once again, a process of regression will be used to find the function of the relationship between Payoff P and Odds of winning (O).  Because the data points look to the naked eye as if there could be a linear relationship, my first estimate will be linear in nature, or be in the form: image47.png

P = image49.png

Table 6: First Estimate for Case 3

Reciprocal of Odds

Actual Payout

Estimated Payout

Difference Squared

44 400

$10 000

$9861.76

19110.30

22 200

$5 000

$4913.38

7503.02

8 880

$1 000

$1944.35

891796.92

1 776

$500

$360.87

19357.16

444

$250

$63.97

34607.16

73.631840796

$200

-$18.59

47781.59

41.3793103448

$150

-$25.78

30898.61

Total = 1051054.76

But since it does appear to have a slight curve, perhaps a quadratic equation would be more accurate:

P = image08.png+ image09.png

Table 7: Second Estimate for Case 3

Reciprocal of Odds

Actual Payout

Estimated Payout

Difference Squared

44 400

$10 000

$9925.92

5487.85

22 200

$5 000

$4509.12

240963.17

8 880

$1 000

$1732.17

536072.91

1 776

$500

$396.22

10770.29

444

$250

$156.96

8656.44

73.631840796

$200

$91.07

11865.74

41.3793103448

$150

$85.34

4180.92

Total = 817997.32

This is an improvement on the linear equation, and it is a good representation of the data.

Comparison

        A major difference between these three games is the entry price.  In the lotto 649 lottery, it is a relatively small $1, with a possibility of winning $2 000 000.  The Heart and Stroke Lottery has a somewhat higher entry price of $100, and the most one stands to win is $1 000 000.

...read more.

Conclusion

P = image08.png+ image09.png and P = image14.png+ image15.png

When these equations are set as equal a quadratic in the reciprocal of the odds is formed:

9.99999981image16.pngimage17.png= 0

This quadratic however has no positive roots; this is because Case 3 is always a better game to play when only considering the odds.  But it must be recalled that the function found to represent Case 3 was based on smaller numbers, thus it is misleading to compare it to other cases.  

        These three games do encompass most of the variables involved in gambling.  They have been examined and analyzed thoroughly to show relations between the three major variables, P, E, and O.  I have made some conclusions based upon my observations; firstlyimage18.png, secondly that image20.png E.  Thus every game of chance which involves these three variables revolve around the same proportionality:image21.png.  Therefore, the payoff of a game must be equal to a constant c multiplied by the entry price divided by the odds, orimage22.png.  I theorize that the magnitude of this constant c determines the attractiveness of games of chance.  After finding the odds of the lotteries, I do wonder why people spend their money on them; it is simply a voluntary taxation in my opinion.  Another question that arises is, if someone were to run a business based on the game used in Case 2, would it be profitable?  And at what price would people be willing to enter, even though mathematically it has no bearing on their long term success in the game?

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The Gradient Function

    5 star(s)

    2 24 2.001 24.036018 36.03601 1 3 1.1 3.993 10.89 1 3 1.01 3.090903 9.1809 1 3 1.001 3.009009003 9.018009 x X3 3x3 gradient 1 1 3 9 2 8 24 36 3 27 81 81 4 64 192 144 After looking through each value, I have observed a pattern.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Estimate a consumption function for the UK economy explaining the economic theory and statistical ...

    3 star(s)

    DW shows the same story. It is 0.348, much less than 2, which means serial correlation. Figure 2 (a) shows that the predicted equation and actual equation fits well from 1950-1975, after that some gaps occurred. This can be shown in the figure 2(b)

  1. Functions. Mappings transform one set of numbers into another set of numbers. We could ...

    is defined as: f(x) f(x)?0 |f(x)| = -f(x) f(x)<0 The modulus is also known as the absolute value and is usually the [Abs] button on your calculator. Graphs of the Modulus Function y = |f(x)| 1. Draw the graph without the modulus 2.

  2. Design, make and test a Sundial.

    Clock time = (sundial time) - (equation of time) For example: Sundial time = 10:00am Date= January 9th ? Equation of time= -7 Clock time = (sundial time) - (equation of time) = 10:00 - (-7) =10:07am This is the GMT.

  1. Math Portfolio Type II - Applications of Sinusoidal Functions

    1 305 6.87h December 1 335 7.50h Toronto Location: 44?N 79?W Date Day Time of Sunset January 1 1 16.80h February 1 32 17.43h March 1 60 18.07h April 1 91 18.72h May 1 121 19.30h June 1 152 19.85h July 1 182 20.05h August 1 213 19.68h September 1

  2. Estimate a consumption function for the UK economy explaining the economic theory and statistical ...

    Throughout the 1980's income levels had increased much more steadily than during the 1970's and so people saved less for precautionary reasons, which meant that they had more disposable income and so increased their consumption accordingly. Uncertainty is not an easy variable to measure but for this project, uncertainty was

  1. Experimentally calculating the wavelength of an He-Ne laser by means of diffraction gratings

    Obtain the 600 lines/mm diffraction grating, and place it 30cm in front of the laser (between the laser and the screen). 3. Make sure that the diffraction grating is at least 1.5m from the screen, and that when the laser is switched on, the beam passes through the center of the grating.

  2. Coding and Modelling - The tools used in my spreadsheets.

    x = 10cm and 3cm Clearly the cutout size cannot be 10cm since the rectangular box is only 15cm wide. The only other possible cutout dimension would be 3cm. To make sure my calculations are correct, I have drawn up a spreadsheet below with a graph showing me how increasing the cutout size affects the volume.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work