• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15

C3 Mei - Numerical Methods to solve equations

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Prital Upadhayay

C3 Coursework

In this coursework, I will use numerical methods to solve the following equation, image47.pngimage48.pngas I cannot solve it algebraically. I can only obtain an approximation of the solution as it is impossible or hard to find the exact value of the function.

Decimal Search

The graph below is the function image56.pngimage56.pngI will use decimal search in order to find an approximation of one of the roots.

image69.pngimage00.pngimage01.png

The table below shows decimal search. Each boundary is tested for sign change which indicates that a root exists between them. The x where the sign change occurs in now the new boundaries and tested for sign change again.

This method is repeated until an approximation of the root is found to a suitable number of decimal places.

x

f(x)

0

2

 0.1

1.9501

0.2

1.8016

0.3

1.5581

0.4

1.2256

0.5

0.8125

0.6

0.3296

0.7

-0.2099

0.8

-0.7904

0.9

-1.3939

1

-2

x

f(x)

0.66

0.011747

0.661

0.006295

0.662

0.000838

0.663

-0.00462

0.664

-0.01009

0.665

-0.01556

0.666

-0.02104

0.667

-0.02652

0.668

-0.032

0.669

-0.03749

0.67

-0.04299

x

f(x)

0.662

0.000838

0.6621

0.000292

0.6622

-0.00025

0.6623

-0.0008

0.6624

-0.00135

0.6625

-0.00189

0.6626

-0.00244

0.6627

-0.00299

0.6628

-0.00353

0.6629

-0.00408

0.663

-0.00462

x

f(x)

 0.6

0.3296

0.61

0.277958

0.62

0.225763

0.63

0.17303

0.64

0.119772

0.65

0.066006

0.66

0.011747

0.67

-0.04299

0.68

-0.09819

0.69

-0.15383

0.7

-0.2099

        [0, 1]                   [0.6, 0.7]                      [0.66, 0.67]                 [0.662, 0.663]

Root intervals [0.6621, 0.6622]                                          
I know that the root is 0.662 to 3 decimal places

...read more.

Middle

image63.png and image64.pngimage64.png are the same to 6 decimal places, indicating that an approximation of the root has been found.

The other two roots were calculated in the same manner.

image65.png

image02.png

image03.png

x

2.8464

2.8283

2.8281

2.8281

image66.png

image04.pngimage04.png

image05.png

image06.png

x

- 0.62766

- 0.46882

- 0.4343

- 0.43266

- 0.43265

- 0.43265

For the last approximation, the error bounds are -0.43265 ± 0.000005

In order to confirm the approximation as the root, I will check for sign change;

image67.png

image68.png

As there is a sign change, when the boundaries of the approximation are put into the equation, a root exists.

Failure

In order to show the failure of this method, I will use following equation:

y = 3.5x+2.8x³+5.4x+3

image70.png

image71.png

image04.png

image07.png

x

-9.499

Overflow

The above graph and the table shows that the Newton-Raphson method has failed even thought the starting root was close to the actual root.

Rearrangement equation

In the rearrangement method, an equation is rearranged to findimage72.png.

The graph below shows the equation image73.pngimage73.png which I will rearrange to find one root.

image74.png

In order to find the root, I rearranged my equation to image75.png

image76.png

image08.png

image09.png

image11.png

image12.png

The graphs above are image77.pngandimage78.png. The two functions intersect at the roots ofimage80.png.

The graph below shows the success of the rearrangement method.

...read more.

Conclusion

The Decimal Search takes more iteration; but, this method is the easiest and easily understood. However, this method is best done on a spreadsheet, where you would be able to spot the sign change easily.

The Rearrangement Method takes slightly more iteration but it provides the root to any degree of accuracy. Also, the formula is iterative, therefore, it is not very time consuming. However, finding image110.pngimage110.png can be tricky.

Software

In terms of the software used, Decimal Search was the easiest as it only required spreadsheet which is not difficult to use. Although making the tables can be repetitive, any faults can easily be rectified.

Both the Newton-Raphson Method and the Rearrangement Method used a calculator to work out the iterative steps. This was often very time-consuming and frustrating as simple mistakes could let to the wrong route.

Autograph was used to draw all the graphs and show the methods at work. It was not hard to use but tricky, due to the different options available.

Page |

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    C3 Coursework - different methods of solving equations.

    5 star(s)

    requires no complex calculations whatsoever except subbing in X values into the original equation. But with Computers being able to do even that, it makes it even easier to use it. So the only human interaction needed is to look at the results and manually looking at between which two points (limits)

  2. OCR MEI C3 Coursework - Numerical Methods

    Graphical illustration The following is a graphical illustration of the process for finding this root with x1=1: Finding the remaining root The other root can be found using x1=-2. xn f(xn) f'(xn) x1 -2 -2.12500 30.27344 x2 -1.92981 -0.87732 10.43071 x3 -1.84570 -0.29110 4.65311 x4 -1.78314 -0.05792 2.98408 x5 -1.76373

  1. Methods of Advanced Mathematics (C3) Coursework.

    3 119 3.5 195.875 4 299 As you can see I have found only the first route and without a graph I wouldn't be aware of the two routes actually present between this interval. The reason for the failure is the fact of two routes being in one interval.

  2. Am going to use numerical methods to solve equations that can't be solved algebraically

    =0 is to rearrange it into the form x=g(x). Therefore, any value of x for which x=g(x) is a root of the original equation. My equation x5-4x+2 can be rearranged in a number of different ways. One way is 4x= x5+2 which gives x= g(x)

  1. C3 Coursework: Numerical Methods

    and the intersection between x=g(x) and y=x gives the point to the root or f(x). This is the graph of the equation y=x5+2x�-10x+6 In order to find the root between 0 and 1 using the x=g(x) method it is necessary to find x=g(x).

  2. Solving Equations. Three numerical methods are discussed in this investigation. There are advantages and ...

    from this fix point and eventually it will converge to the roots. This method requires us to start with a point which is close to the target root and we call it. Then we will find the gradient - at Cartesian co-ordinate and we can find the better estimation -

  1. Numerical solution of equations, Interval bisection---change of sign methods, Fixed point iteration ---the Newton-Raphson ...

    Nevertheless, considering the use of software Autograph and Excel, it is not the easiest way to deal with. First of all, when using bisection method, I need to type five formulae into Excel, including to define the value of x, f(x), Maximum Possible Errors and the assumptions of value a and b.

  2. I am going to solve equations by using three different numerical methods in this ...

    I have chosen a non-trivial equation y=10(x-1.32)(x-1.98)(x-1.55)+0.1.And the graph shows: We can see these three roots are very close together. They are all in the interval [1, 2].By using the Excel: A B f(a)<0 f(b)>0 (a+b)/2 y=10(x-1.32)(x-1.98)(x-1.55) 1 2 -1.6248 0.1612 1.5 0.1432 1 1.5 -1.6248 0.1432 1.25 -0.0533 1.25

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work