• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# C3 Mei - Numerical Methods to solve equations

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

C3 Coursework

In this coursework, I will use numerical methods to solve the following equation,  as I cannot solve it algebraically. I can only obtain an approximation of the solution as it is impossible or hard to find the exact value of the function.

Decimal Search

The graph below is the function  I will use decimal search in order to find an approximation of one of the roots.   The table below shows decimal search. Each boundary is tested for sign change which indicates that a root exists between them. The x where the sign change occurs in now the new boundaries and tested for sign change again.

This method is repeated until an approximation of the root is found to a suitable number of decimal places.

 x f(x) 0 2 0.1 1.9501 0.2 1.8016 0.3 1.5581 0.4 1.2256 0.5 0.8125 0.6 0.3296 0.7 -0.2099 0.8 -0.7904 0.9 -1.3939 1 -2 x f(x) 0.66 0.011747 0.661 0.006295 0.662 0.000838 0.663 -0.00462 0.664 -0.01009 0.665 -0.01556 0.666 -0.02104 0.667 -0.02652 0.668 -0.032 0.669 -0.03749 0.67 -0.04299 x f(x) 0.662 0.000838 0.6621 0.000292 0.6622 -0.00025 0.6623 -0.0008 0.6624 -0.00135 0.6625 -0.00189 0.6626 -0.00244 0.6627 -0.00299 0.6628 -0.00353 0.6629 -0.00408 0.663 -0.00462
 x f(x) 0.6 0.3296 0.61 0.277958 0.62 0.225763 0.63 0.17303 0.64 0.119772 0.65 0.066006 0.66 0.011747 0.67 -0.04299 0.68 -0.09819 0.69 -0.15383 0.7 -0.2099

[0, 1]                   [0.6, 0.7]                      [0.66, 0.67]                 [0.662, 0.663]

Root intervals [0.6621, 0.6622]
I know that the root is 0.662 to 3 decimal places

Middle and  are the same to 6 decimal places, indicating that an approximation of the root has been found.

The other two roots were calculated in the same manner.   x 2.8464 2.8283 2.8281 2.8281     x - 0.62766 - 0.46882 - 0.4343 - 0.43266 - 0.43265 - 0.43265

For the last approximation, the error bounds are -0.43265 ± 0.000005

In order to confirm the approximation as the root, I will check for sign change;  As there is a sign change, when the boundaries of the approximation are put into the equation, a root exists.

Failure

In order to show the failure of this method, I will use following equation:

y = 3.5x+2.8x³+5.4x+3    x -9.499 Overflow

The above graph and the table shows that the Newton-Raphson method has failed even thought the starting root was close to the actual root.

Rearrangement equation

In the rearrangement method, an equation is rearranged to find .

The graph below shows the equation  which I will rearrange to find one root. In order to find the root, I rearranged my equation to      The graphs above are and . The two functions intersect at the roots of .

The graph below shows the success of the rearrangement method.

Conclusion

The Decimal Search takes more iteration; but, this method is the easiest and easily understood. However, this method is best done on a spreadsheet, where you would be able to spot the sign change easily.

The Rearrangement Method takes slightly more iteration but it provides the root to any degree of accuracy. Also, the formula is iterative, therefore, it is not very time consuming. However, finding  can be tricky.

Software

In terms of the software used, Decimal Search was the easiest as it only required spreadsheet which is not difficult to use. Although making the tables can be repetitive, any faults can easily be rectified.

Both the Newton-Raphson Method and the Rearrangement Method used a calculator to work out the iterative steps. This was often very time-consuming and frustrating as simple mistakes could let to the wrong route.

Autograph was used to draw all the graphs and show the methods at work. It was not hard to use but tricky, due to the different options available.

Page |

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics essays

1.  ## C3 Coursework - different methods of solving equations.

5 star(s)

requires no complex calculations whatsoever except subbing in X values into the original equation. But with Computers being able to do even that, it makes it even easier to use it. So the only human interaction needed is to look at the results and manually looking at between which two points (limits)

2.  ## The Gradient Function

5 star(s)

Therefore, this proves my prediction was correct, and works with the rule nx n-1. I will now test this formula with each relevant datum in the table. x X 0.25 Gradient 1 1 0.25 2 1.414214 0.148651 3 1.732051 0.109673 4 2 0.088388 Gradient 1/4x3/4 0.25 0.25 0.148651 0.148651 0.109673 0.109673 0.088388 0.088388 These are exactly the same.

1.  ## Estimate a consumption function for the UK economy explaining the economic theory and statistical ...

3 star(s)

In this case, therefore, consumption will thus have risen. Thus, the house price should be considered as an important factor included into the consumption function. So, just simply add the house price to the function: ?ct=c0+c1?yt+c2st-1+c3?t+c4HPt the tests result in Table 8 shows that the value of the t-test indicates that all the variable except LS_1 is insignificant.

2. ## The method I am going to use to solve x&amp;amp;#8722;3x-1=0 is the Change ...

= 3x�+6x, so the iterative formula is xn+1=xn - [(xn�-+3xn�-1)/ (3xn�+6xn)] As the graph shown above, the root is between x=0 and x=-1, so I take x0 = 0 as the starting value and it is worked as below: x0 = 0 x1 = undefined The Newton-Raphson method does not

1. ## OCR MEI C3 Coursework - Numerical Methods

Graphical illustration The following is a graphical illustration of the process for finding this root with x1=1: Finding the remaining root The other root can be found using x1=-2. xn f(xn) f'(xn) x1 -2 -2.12500 30.27344 x2 -1.92981 -0.87732 10.43071 x3 -1.84570 -0.29110 4.65311 x4 -1.78314 -0.05792 2.98408 x5 -1.76373

2. ## In this coursework I will be looking at equations that cannot be solved algebraically

I will attempt to solve the equation Here is a graph of the function There are roots between the integer bounds [-1,0] and [1,2]. I will try to find the root between [-1,0]. Here is the table of iterative values where x0 =1 (accurate to 10 s.f)

1. ## Methods of Advanced Mathematics (C3) Coursework.

This method works for most functions of x but can still cause anomalous results in the occasion of certain instances where the method will not work as there being two routes within an interval. When I plot a graph with this characteristic both routes are clearly distinguishable visually, however when

2. ## C3 COURSEWORK - comparing methods of solving functions

If so, I think that the decimal search will be the simplest way to find the roots. • Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to
improve your own work 