• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

C3 Numerical Solutions to Equations

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Adam Arstall

Numerical Solutions to Equations Coursework

Change of sign method

The change of sign method involves finding the interval in which a root of an equation lies by taking two values of x and showing that the root lies between them as the value of f(x) for each case has a different sign. A change of sign will always indicate a root if the function is continuous.

This method will be used to find a root of the equation f(x)=x⁵+x⁴−2x³+5x²−7x−2=0. As the function f(x) is continuous, a change of sign will always indicate a root.

image00.png

The method will be used to find the root which lies between -2 and -3

image01.png

As the root lies in the interval [-2.7211575,-2.7211574], x=-2.72115745 ± 0.000000005

image09.png

Here it is shown that f(x) changes from negative to positive between -2.7211575 and-2.7211574 and the root to f(x)=0 is between these x values.

This method can fail to find roots in some cases. For example if the equation has a repeated root as shown below for the equation x³−0.96x²−5.

...read more.

Middle

Therefore x=-1.53407020 ± 0.000000005

To confirm this root there must be a change of sign. f(-1.5340703) = 1.16*10^-6.

f(-1.5340701) = -1.08*10^-6. Therefore there is a root as the function is continuous.

image13.png

image14.png

These two diagrams show the convergence of the iterations at different magnifications. It is shown that the root lies between -1.53407035 and -1.53407025.

Taking 1 as the first guess gives the following results

image15.png

Therefore x=0.48269595 ± 0.000000005

f( 0.48269594) = -1.08*10^-7. f(0.48269596) = 0.0113

Therefore there is a root as the function is continuous.

Taking 4 as the first guess gives

Therefore x=4.05137424 ± 0.000000005image16.png

f(4.05137423) = 2.34*10^-7  f(4.05137425) = -1.65*10^-7

Therefore there is a root as the function is continuous.

This method can fail for some starting points such as ones where the gradient of the curve is very small which can lead to the iterations converging on the wrong root. For the equation ¼x³−½x²−2x+3=0, an initial guess of 2.35 to find the root between 0 and 3 makes the iteration converge on the root between -4 and -2 as shown below.

image02.png

Rearranging f(x)=0 in the form x=g(x)

In this method the equation f(x)

...read more.

Conclusion

The change of sign method was fairly easy to use as it requires little extra hardware or software and can be carried out manually if necessary using only a calculator. This makes it particularly useful if computer software is not available. However the need for much manual computation can make the process quite laborious and time consuming. The Newton-Raphson and x=g(x) methods are relatively similar in terms of ease of use with hardware and software. Both make good use of Autograph software visually interpret equations before using an Excel spreadsheet to carry out the calculations to find each root. Compared to the change of sign method both are generally more easy to use as once the initial formula has been entered it is very quick and simple to do the iterations many times.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The Gradient Function

    5 star(s)

    4 128 4.01 128.962402 96.4806 4 128 4.001 128.096024 96.04801 3 54 3.1 59.582 57.66 3 54 3.01 54.541802 54.3606 3 54 3.001 54.054018 54.03601 2 16 2.1 18.522 26.46 2 16 2.01 16.241202 24.2406 2 16 2.001 16.024012 24.02401 1 2 1.1 2.662 7.26 1 2 1.01 2.060602 6.1206

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Estimate a consumption function for the UK economy explaining the economic theory and statistical ...

    3 star(s)

    The p-value gives the same conclusion. The surprise in this equation is that DW is increase again, which reach 1.57. Even this number still less than 2,but it closer. So, so far, this is the best number we have seen from all the consumption function. The Figure9 (a) and (b)

  1. OCR MEI C3 Coursework - Numerical Methods

    x f(x) -1.60 -1.08576 -1.59 -0.80215 -1.58 -0.52658 -1.57 -0.2589 -1.56 0.001042 Change of sign indicates root exists in interval [-1.57,-1.56] x=-1.565�0.005 x=-1.6 (1d.p.) x f(x) -1.570 -0.2589 -1.569 -0.23256 -1.568 -0.2063 -1.567 -0.18011 -1.566 -0.154 -1.565 -0.12797 -1.564 -0.10202 -1.563 -0.07614 -1.562 -0.05033 -1.561 -0.02461 -1.560 0.001042 Change of sign indicates root exists in interval [-1.561,-1.560] x=-1.5605�0.0005 x=-1.56 (2d.p.)

  2. Numerical integration can be described as set of algorithms for calculating the numerical value ...

    0.0000793527354329 0.2500998786936790 M32 0.9328793957832550 0.0000198461095058 0.2500000000000000 M64 0.9328595496737490 0.0000049615273764 0.2500000000000000 "M128" 0.9328545881463730 0.0000012403818441 0.2500000000000000 "M256" 0.9328533477645280 0.0000003100954610 0.2500000000000000 "M512" 0.9328530376690670 0.0000000775238653 0.2500000000000000 "M1024" 0.9328529601452020 0.0000000193809663 0.2500000000000000 "M2048" 0.9328529407642360 0.0000000048452416 0.2500000000000000 * Note that "Mn" indicates an extrapolated estimate Referring to the use of polynomials on page 4, the gap between

  1. Solving Equations Using Numerical Methods

    I will use the same equation as the previous success but try to find either of the remaining two roots. My estimate and starting value will be -2 as it is near the first root (shown on the graph) n Xn 1 -2 2 -1.875 3 -1.523 4 -0.7581 5

  2. Numerical Method (Maths Investigation)

    Observe that the values obtained have increase to 1.51213, 1.51214 and so on. The numbers is either step up automatically or step down with number of steps determined by the two selected records. If you type in 2 in first row and 4 in second row under the same column,

  1. I am going to solve equations by using three different numerical methods in this ...

    And also I am impressed how they work out the roots. However, there are differences in the speed of convergence and the ease of use. Therefore, I am going to compare three methods how they work. Afterwards, I am going to compare the speed of convergence and ease of use with available hardware and software.

  2. MEI numerical Methods

    D.P because of its display screen, however excel is accurate to 15 D.P. My calculation was done to 9 D.P. This is because I felt it 9D.P would be close to the real root and it would still be neat and easy to understand.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work