• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14

Coding and Modelling - The tools used in my spreadsheets.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Coding and Modellingimage00.pngimage01.png

The tools used in my spreadsheets:

  • Cell outline - to make my grid standout from the page

  • Different font styles – to make the column headings standout from the rest of the text
  • A centre justification tool – in order to make my spreadsheets look professional
  • The graphing feature – enabling me to draw up graphs from my data
  • Various mathematical calculations such as multiplying cells and the what if function – allowing me to save time and fully investigate my project

This is seen as an inappropriate graph because it only shows how the height affects the volume of the box when the question asks you how the cutout size affects the volume of a square of side 24cm:

image14.png

Results:

For a square of size 24cm, the largest volume of box that can be made is 1024cm3, using a square cutout of 4cm.

For a square of size 120cm, the largest volume of box that can be made is 128000cm3, using a square cutout of 20 cm.

Final Conclusion

In both cases, it would appear that a trend emerges.

In each case the optimum cutout size is 1/6 of the size of the square sheet

i.e.

...read more.

Middle

                15 cm                                                         (15 cm – 2x)

                                       x cmimage11.png

                                        (23 cm –2x)

Question 2b)Similarly for a rectangle with a length of 23cm, a width of 15cm and a cutout size of x cm, a box can be formed of volume (y):

= Length * Width * Height

= (23 – 2x) * (15 – 2x) * x

= 345x – 76x2 + 4x3

Essentially differentiating is done by taking an equation:

xn and applying the principle nx(n-1)

Therefore if: y = 345x – 76x2 + 4x3                =>dy= 345 – 152x + 12x2

                                                                            dx

resulting in a quadratic equation, which can be solved by:

x =  -b + or -        √b2 – 4ac             hence x = - (-152) + or - √ (152)2 – 4 (345)(12)

               2a                                                     2(12)  

x = 152 + or - √ 23104 - 16560

                            24

x = 9.704cm (4s.f) and 2.963cm (4s.f)

Clearly the cutout size cannot be 9.704cm (4s.f) since the rectangular box is only 15cm wide. The only other possible cutout dimension would be 2.963cm (4s.f).

Instead of creating a new spreadsheet, I can change values within an old spreadsheet to suit the new condition I want.

image15.png

For example in the above spreadsheet, I predict that if I change cell B2 to 23 cell B5 and the rest of the column going downwards will change subtracting 1 each time from the value because of the formula =B2-2*A5.

...read more.

Conclusion

2 – 4ac             hence x = - (-140) + or - √ (140)2 – 4 (300)(12)

               2a                                                     2(12)  

x = 140 + or - √ 19600 - 14400

                            24

x = 8.838(4s.f) and 2.829cm (4s.f)

I have investigated five different rectangles, the results of which can be seen on the spreadsheet below:

image18.png

Final Conclusion:

As you can see from the graph and the spreadsheet, my final prediction was right. As the length and width values get closer together, the optimum cutout size gets smaller because the volume size decreases.

I feel that my results have been very accurate because not only did I solve various formulae using differentiation but I also checked the results by constructing charts and graphs which showed me the optimum values. This has led to valid conclusions especially for the square Max Box where I achieved a general formula. I know that my other conclusion is valid because I have tested out the theory by doing lots of examples.

I feel that my results were also relevant because once I had found out that the cutout size affects the volume of the box, I was able to continue further in order to see whether a pattern emerged when investigating how the size of the length affected the cutout size when the width of the box remained constantly at 15cm. Unfortunately, I was unable to find a general formula for the rectangle Max Boxes.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The Gradient Function

    5 star(s)

    It is clear enough that this works for all the values of n previously proven, but now I will attempt to try and prove this for fractional and negative powers to prove that this formula is correct. If there is irrefutable evidence to support this gradient function for xn, I will investigate different values of "a" in axn-1.

  2. The open box problem

    To verify this I am going to draw another graph to show that this is correct. So we can see here the graph definitely shows that the largest volume possible is 16 and that the length of the square cutting for this would be 1.

  1. Numerical integration can be described as set of algorithms for calculating the numerical value ...

    In addition this also proves that the mid-point rule is a second order polynomial. However, we should note that the mid-point rule is only an overestimate when the curve is convex. This is also the case for the curve On the other hand, the trapezium rule is an underestimate and

  2. The Gradient Fraction

    As you can see, I have investigated all the positive points on the 'x' scale. Some results are not all to 1 decimal place. The pattern in this results table is that the 'x' value has been multiplied by 4.

  1. Functions Coursework - A2 Maths

    If x1 is an approximate root of the equation f(x)=0, the Newton-Raphson formula for finding a second approximation x2 from x1 is x2 = x1 - (f(x1)/(f /( x1)) In the case f(x)=x3-7x-4, the Newton-Raphson formula simplifies to: x2 = (2x13+4)/(3x12-7)

  2. Numerical Differentiation

    x y 0 5.29 1 1.69 2 0.09 3 0.49 4 2.89 To show another limitation of The Decimal search method I have used the equation: x (x+3.9)(x-3.9) As you can see from the table below, there must be a sign change between x=3 and x=4, however looking at the graph shows that there is actually a discontinuity.

  1. Mathematical Investigation

    Therefore based upon the observations the following points can be conjectured: 1. varying values of "c" only changes the position of the waves in a horizontal translation along the x-axis while the amplitude and period remain the same with the original function 2.

  2. Fractals. In order to create a fractal, you will need to be acquainted ...

    In general, we can break a line segment into N1 self-similar pieces, each with magnification factor N. The two-dimensional square can be broken down into N2 self-similar pieces, with a magnification factor of N. However, we can break the cube into N3 self-similar pieces, each of which has magnification factor of N.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work