• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
  21. 21
  22. 22
  23. 23
  24. 24
  25. 25
  26. 26
  27. 27
  28. 28
  29. 29

decimal search

Extracts from this document...



In maths equations can be solved using various methods. A very common and efficient method in solving equations is algebraically. But not all equations can be solved algebraically; these equations must be solved using numeric methods.

I will study three specific numeric methods on different equations.

            ~ Change of sign, decimal search process.

            ~ Newton-Raphson method.

            ~ Re-arrangement method. 

I will be testing the numeric methods with separate equations which cannot be solved algebraically. I will also apply all of the methods to one of the equations and check if all the methods give me the same value for the root I want to find.  

Change of Sign, Decimal Search

To find the root of the equation f(x) = 0 means finding values of x for the graph          y = f(x). The change of sign method works on the bases that the y = f(x) graph changes signs when it crosses the x-axis.



image01.png                                                                                            y = f(x)


The sketch above shows that there is a root between the interval [b , c] and the curve of y = f(x) crosses the x-axis and changes its sign from negative ( - ) to positive ( + ), and at the interval [a , b] f(x) curve crosses the x-axis changing its sign from positive  ( + ) to negative ( - ).

...read more.





The tangent produces a closer estimate of the root. This eventually leads to the actual root. 

From this procedure the Newton-Raphson iterative formula is produced.

A chosen equation and an estimate root value are used with the iterative           Newton-Raphson formula to eventually converge to the actual root.

Failure of Newton-Raphson Method

The Newton-Raphson method will fail if the starting point is carelessly selected. If the initial value of x is not close to the root needed to be found, the Newton-Raphson formula may not converge to the root. Also if the initial value is selected close to a turning point then it will also cause the formula to either diverge or converge to another root.




The selected initial value lies to close to the turning point of the f(x) curve, this creates the tangent from the initial value to diverge outside the area of the f(x) curve. This subsequently renders the method to fail as no further estimates of the root can be obtained.

When trying to find the root between the interval [0 , 1] and using the initial value as 0.88.


The tangent is forced to diverge from the f(x) curve, this illustrates the failure of the Newton-Raphson method.

Newton-Raphson Method in Practise

The equation to be used in finding a root using the Newton-Raphson method is,

                     y = xµ - 3x + 1

Sketch of       y = xµ - 3x + 1

Sketch of y = xµ - 3x + 1 with tangent line markings.

Initial value = 2 (x  )

...read more.


The Newton-Raphson method only required two iterations before converging to the required root.

The change of sign method had to go through six cycles before producing the required root correct to six decimal places.

The re-arrangement method went through four iterations to produce the root value.

Although the re-arrangement method only marginally lost in time efficiency when compared to the Newton-Raphson method; the re-arrangement method proves to be the most demanding. As the re-arrangement method relies on producing a re-arrangement to the form of y = g(x) and satisfies the fact y = g` (x) < y = x`.

The change of sign, decimal search method is a very straight forward method which can be applied easier then the other methods, but lacks in its rate of convergence.

So in an overall comparison I can state that the Newton-Raphson method has the fastest rate of convergence, and thus has an efficient process of finding the desired root of an equation that must be solved numerically.

The use of software packages and hardware devices make understanding the methods and application of the methods faster and more accurate.

Using Excel spreadsheet in displaying the calculations for the change of sign method proved to be efficient as it enabled repetitions of calculations to be performed much faster than by manual process.

Also using graphical displaying software such as Autograph allowed easier demonstration of the process of the different methods, and a more accurate interpretation of the methods.     

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Decision Mathematics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Decision Mathematics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The Gradient Function

    5 star(s)

    In this investigation, in the last section, for each value of n I have attempted to prove each gradient function is valid using general proof. Here, I shall try and do the same for when x = n. As a guideline, I shall use the previous proof of x� along the way to compare to it to x^n.

  2. Numerical Method (Maths Investigation)

    I can set the scales to Automatic and it will help me to adjust to my likings as I can always change them myself. Another advantage of Graphmatica is that the graph produced can be copy onto the Coursework I'm doing, which I have done.

  1. The method I am going to use to solve x&amp;amp;#8722;3x-1=0 is the Change ...

    I know that this method for finding the root has worked and I am going to show how it works graphically in this root. It is shown as below: As the method I have used to find the roots, the roots are x=-1.380277569 and x=0.819172513, both are in 9 decimal places accuracy.

  2. MEI numerical Methods

    - ?(root), provided the root is smaller than the approximation. However in this investigation this is impossible as the root, ?, is unknown. However it is true that the absolute error represented by ? approximately obeys the following equation. X2-x1/ = k?

  1. Change of Sign Method.

    = 0.000013160499 and x= 0.867495 into f(x) = -0.000002560434 The above calculations illustrate that there is a change of sign. Therefore the root is 0.86749�0.000005. I will now find the other root of the equation that lies in the interval [1,2].

  2. In this coursework I will be looking at equations that cannot be solved algebraically

    is clear that the curve does cross the x-axis again twice between [5, 6] at 5.22 and 5.23. This is not shown by the decimal search method as both the roots are between [5.2, 5.3]. Newton-Raphson Method I am going to solve the equation using the Newton-Raphson method.

  1. Decimal search.

    You are unable to do any further by decimal search for a root without a change of sign. x f(x) 1 24 1.1 32.798 1.2 43.264 1.3 55.506 1.4 69.632 1.5 85.75 1.6 103.968 1.7 124.394 1.8 147.136 1.9 172.302 2 200 Newton-Raphson Iteration This method is based on the iteration.

  2. Change of Sign Method

    This can be done with an integer search and a graph of y=x�-3x�-4x+7. x -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 y -173 -89 -35 -5 7 7 1 -5

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work