• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
1. 1
1
2. 2
2
3. 3
3
4. 4
4
5. 5
5
6. 6
6
7. 7
7
8. 8
8
9. 9
9
10. 10
10
11. 11
11
12. 12
12
13. 13
13
14. 14
14

# Distribution of the weights of two types of sweets

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Distribution of the weights of two types of sweets

The aim of this investigation is to collect data from a population and using the results estimate population parameters i.e. mean. To collect my data I am required to measure one factor of the chosen population, these factors include:

• Heights
• Weights
• Pulse rates
• Reaction times of males and females
• Age group’s etc.

I have decided that my population will be two types of sweets and the factor that I am going to measure is the weights of each individual sweet. The two types of sweets I have decided to use are:

• Galaxy Minstrels
• Maltesers

When collecting my data I will have select an appropriate method to obtain the information that I require. There are two methods in which data can be collected:

• Survey – used to determine some particular characteristic(s) of a population, usually

done through questionnaires.

• Experiment – used to test a factor when that factor is the only variable.

The most suitable method to use to measure the weights of individual sweets is by doing an experiment.

It would be impossible to collect the weights of each sweet in the whole population a sample of the population must be taken.

Middle

2.05

2.51

2.45

1.76

1.60

1.60

2.24

1.73

2.43

2.65

1.70

2.10

1.89

2.18

1.62

1.44

2.03

2.18

2.20

1.88

1.64

1.95

2.25

1.87

1.71

2.11

1.95

2.27

2.08

2.38

1.87

2.27

2.02

2.15

1.43

1.69

2.22

1.70

2.46

1.48

2.15

2.35

1.89

1.69

1.16

2.19

2.04

2.66

2.01

2.33

2.09

2.31

2.27

1.86

2.23

1.89

1.97

2.76

2.04

2.14

2.33

2.15

1.73

1.34

1.67

1.74

1.92

1.76

2.41

2.13

1.49

1.80

1.96

1.91

2.55

2.49

2.51

1.85

2.06

1.40

2.02

2.07

2.09

2.16

2.18

Mean, Variance and Standard deviation

u = ∑x

## n                 100

### Maltesers, u =   ∑x   =   202.32   = 2.02g (2 d.p)

n                 100

### The variance, o  ², is calculated by taking the mean of the sum of the squared deviations from the mean. The formula to calculate variance is:

o  ² = ∑x ²  - x ²

n

## I will once again calculate the variance of the Galaxy minstrels and Maltesers separately.

Galaxy Minstrels, o  ² = ∑x ²  - x ²  =  684.2055  - 2.61²

n                  100

= 6.842 – 6.812

=0.03 (2 d.p)

Maltesers, o  ² = ∑x ²  - x ²  =  419.735  - 2.02²

n                            100

= 4.197 – 4.080

= 0.12 (2 d.p)

## Standard Deviation

The standard deviation, o  , is the measure of spread around the mean. It is calculated using this formula:

o = /∑x ²  - x ²

n

As you can see the standard deviation is simply the squared root of the variance:

√variance

As I have already calculated the variance it will be relatively easy to calculate the standard deviation (by square rooting the variance)

Galaxy Minstrels o  = √variance = √0.03

= 0.17 (2 d.p)

Maltesers o  = √variance = √0.12

= 0.35 (2 d.p)

Now that I have calculated the mean, variance and standard deviations of the Galaxy minstrels and Maltesers I will be able to compare them to do this I will place the results in a table as it will be easier to look at the data:

##### Variance

Standard Deviation

Galaxy Minstrels

2.61

0.03

0.17

Maltesers

2.02

0.12

0.35

Conclusion

= 2.61 – 1.645 * 0.017, 2.61 + 1.645 * 0.017

= 2.58, 2.64

This shows that there is a 90% confidence that the weight of a Galaxy minstrel weighs between 2.58g and 2.64g.

Maltesers:

90% confidence interval = (sample mean – N.D.V * s.e, sample mean + N.D.V * s.e)

= 2.02 – 1.645 * 0.035, 2.02 + 1.645 * 0.035

= 1.96g, 2.08g

This shows that there is a 90% confidence that the weight of a maltesers weighs between 1.96g and 2.08g.

Now I will calculate the 95% confidence intervals.

Galaxy Minstrels

95% confidence interval = (sample mean – N.D.V * s.e, sample mean + N.D.V * s.e)

= 2.61 – 1.96 * 0.017, 2.61 + 1.96 * 0.017

= 2.58, 2.64

This shows that there is a 95% confidence that the weight of a Galaxy minstrel weighs between 2.58g and 2.64g.

Maltesers:

90% confidence interval = (sample mean – N.D.V * s.e, sample mean + N.D.V * s.e)

= 2.02 – 1.96 * 0.035, 2.02 + 1.96 * 0.035

= 1.95g, 2.09g

This shows that there is a 95% confidence that the weight of a maltesers weighs between 1.95g and 2.09g.

Now I will calculated 99% confidence intervals

Galaxy Minstrels

99% confidence interval = (sample mean – N.D.V * s.e, sample mean + N.D.V * s.e)

= 2.61 – 2.575 * 0.017, 2.61 + 2.575 * 0.017

= 2.57, 2.65

This shows that there is a 99% confidence that the weight of a Galaxy minstrel weighs between 2.57g and 2.65g.

*****Maltesers:

70% confidence interval = (sample mean – N.D.V * s.e, sample mean + N.D.V * s.e)

= 2.02 – 0.525 * 0.035, 2.02 + 0.525 * 0.035

= 2.00g, 2.04g

This shows that there is a 70% confidence that the weight of a maltesers weighs between 2.00g and 2.04g.

Table

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Probability & Statistics section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related AS and A Level Probability & Statistics essays

1. ## Design an investigation to see if there is a significant relationship between the number ...

bladders on a Fucus Vesiculosus plant will mean that it has less buoyancy, and therefore will be further away from the sun, under water. This will restrict the rate of absorption of light energy, due to the fact that light travels slower through water.

2. ## &amp;quot;The lengths of lines are easier to guess than angles. Also, that year 11's ...

This is a low spread of data, but not as low as the year 9 estimates of the length of line 2. The year nines estimates were therefore more close together. This table shoes the Year 11 estimates for the size of angle 6. Estimate for Angle size Frequency (f)

1. ## Collect data from a population with a view to estimating population parameters.

This can be calculated using the following formula: s.e. = n After looking at data tables for the normal distribution function it is possible to obtain a value of Z for which an area equal to that of the probability you would like to be confident of lies between +Z and -Z.

2. ## My aim is that within the limits of a small-scale survey I will collect ...

In this investigation I will need to calculate a few things in order to come to my conclusion. This is a quick plan of what I will be calculating. * The mean, standard deviation and variance of the sample.

1. ## The normal distribution

That is, 68%, 95% and 99.7%. The 95% value, which is used as the standard in tests of significance) lies between 1.96 standard deviations either side of the mean. Standard deviation of a sample is the squared difference between each score and the mean ?

2. ## Used Cars - What main factor that affects the price of a second hand ...

The data will be measured on a scale from -1 to +1. -1 being perfect (100%) negative correlation, +1 being perfect (100%) positive correlation and 0 being no correlation. Using spearman's rank correlation coefficient will man it will be easy see which factor has a best agreement with the price of second hand car.

1. ## Estimating the length of a line and the size of an angle.

In addition the person answering the questions can receive help if he or she does not understand the question. Evan though quota sampling has its advantages it can easily be distorted than stratified sampling. So in my opinion I think that stratified sampling would be a better sampling method than quota sampling would be.

2. ## find out if there is a connection between people's IQ and their average KS2 ...

The trendline looks like it has changed on my second graph, it looks steeper, but this might just be because the scale on the axis has changed, there are fewer numbers on it and the trendline might just be more stretched.

• Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to