• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Fractals. In order to create a fractal, you will need to be acquainted with complex numbers. Complex numbers on a graph are characterized by the coordinates of (x,y)

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Ruzeb Chowdhury                                                                         June 09, 2012

Fractals

Usually when one speaks of fractals to an audience, the audience refers to a piece of art that consists of repeating shapes and self-similar patterning (“same as near as far”). However, they do not realize that fractals were made and recognized due to a mathematical concept that was developed by many people such as Gottfried Leibniz, Georg Cantor, Waclaw Sierpiński, Gaston Julia, and Benoit Mandelbrot. Mandelbrot was the one to coin the term “fractal”, but the other mathematicians paved the way for Mandelbrot’s findings. Also, some people may think that there is just one way to make a fractal, which is by using math. This is not totally true, as there ways to make the same fractal in a different approach, such as by using the L-system. A fractal created with the Julia set under constant -.74434 - .10772i.

The mathematics behind fractals, such as the Koch Curve, is rather simple, yet it becomes a complicated, yet ingenious method when referring to the Mandelbrot Set. In order to create a fractal, you will need to be acquainted with complex numbers.  Complex numbers on a graph are characterized by the coordinates of (x,y) in which the x-coordinate is any rational number, whereas the y-coordinate contains an imaginary number, denoted by “i”. An imaginary number is the square root of a negative number. An example of a complex number can be: (5 + 4i).

Middle

z2 + z0 ever lands outside of the circle of radius 2 centered at the origin, then this orbit definitely tends to infinity. Therefore, 2i does not exist in the Mandelbrot since it quickly leaves the boundary after only one iteration:

z0 = 0

z1 = 0 + 2i

Enough of whole numbers, the Mandelbrot Set requires the use of fractions for the values of the real and imaginary parts, or else we’d only be talking about a few points. For example, the iteration of .7 + 6i is not considered a point in the Mandelbrot Set only after three iterations:

z1 = 0.7 + 0.6i

z2 = 0.83 + 1.44i

z3 = -0.6847 + 2.9904i

z3 = 3.06778523531

Usually, smaller fractions for the complex and imaginary parts tend to stay in the Mandelbrot Set, even after fifty iterations! For example, when iterating .2 + .3i , it stays inside the circle of radius 2:

z1 = 0.2 +0.3i

z2 = 0.15 + 0.42i

z3 = 0.0461 + 0.426i

z4 = 0.02064921 + 0.3392772i

z5 = 0.0853173714338 + 0.314011612302i

z50 = 0.079204221383 + 0.356467487952i

z50 = 0.365160757272

In order to create the Mandelbrot Fractal, we just ask the computer to color the pixels black if the value of c is bounded; else we color the pixel white if it goes to infinity. Different colors were determined by the quickness of the equation to go until infinity, thus the presence of blue in the image below. Fractal created by the Mandelbrot Set

French mathematician Gaston Julia had published her work at the age of 25, yet it was not recognized as an input to the mathematical world until after about sixty years, when computers were able to visualize Julia’s creation.

Conclusion

log (self similar pieces)log (magnification factor)

The dimension of a square is two, and is proven below:

dimension = log (self similar pieces)log (magnification factor)

= logN2log N

= 2 log Nlog N = 2

Similarly, to find the dimension of a fractal, we use the same formula. The Sierpińksi Triangle consists of three self-similar pieces under the magnification of two.

Therefore:

dimension=log3log2 1.585

The fractal dimension of the Sierpińksi triangle is approximately 1.58, less than a square yet more than a line. Fractal dimension is the measure of how "complicated" a self-similar figure is and how large it is. The Sierpińksi triangle is more complicated than the Koch Curve (1.26) and the Cantor Dust (.63), thus it is larger than them.

Bibliography

“Creating Fractals: The Mathematics.” Adam Lerer. Angelfire. n.d. Web. 25 May. 2012.

“Escape Criterion.” Professor Michael Frame. classes.yale.edu. Fall 2000. Web. 2 June.

2012.

“Fractal Dimension.” Professor Robert L. Devaney. Boston University. 2 April. 1995.

Web. 4 June. 2012

“Fractals and Fractal Geometry.” Thinkquest.org. Oracle Thinkquest. n.d. Web. 23 May.

2012.

“Introduction to the Mandelbrot Set.” David Dewey. cs.washington.edu. n.d. Web. 22

May. 2012.

“Julia Set Generator.” www.easyfractalgenerator.com. n.d. Web. 5 June. 2012.

“Julia Sets.” Professor Michael Frame. classes.yale.edu. Fall 2000. Web. 2 June. 2012.

“L-system.” Wikipedia.org. n.d. Web. 30 May. 2012.

“Mandelbrot Calculator.” Gary Rubinstein. MATHE 6500C. 2009. Web. 26 May. 2012.

Mandelbrot, Benoit. The Fractal Geometry of Nature. U.S.A: Macmillan, 1983. Print.

"The Math of Fractals." Coolmath.com. Coolmath.com, Inc., n.d. Web. 22 May.

2012.

“The Mandelbrot Set.” Professor Robert L. Devaney.Boston University. n.d. Web. 29

May. 2012

## “Fractals and the Fractal Dimension.” Vanderbilt.edu. n.d. Web. 9 June. 2012

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related AS and A Level Core & Pure Mathematics essays

1.  5 star(s)

I have noticed that the gradient is always equal to 6x. I predict that when x = 5, the gradient will be equal to 30. 5 25 75 30 The gradient here is 30, so therefore I was correct. Now, to the binomial proof...

2.  ## Estimate a consumption function for the UK economy explaining the economic theory and statistical ...

3 star(s)

DW=2 if there is no serial correlation. DW=4 if there is extreme negative serial correlation. Usually, DW used as an information check should be around 2. In this circumstance, DW = 0.498 which is too far away from 2, means that the data not fits the equation well.

1. ## 2D and 3D Sequences Project Plan of Investigation

- 12 +1 3. 72 - 12 + 1 4. 72 - 11 5. = 61 Successful Sequence 8: 1. 2(82) - 16 + 1 2. 2(64) - 16 + 1 3. 128 - 16 + 1 4. 128 - 15 5.

2. ## Functions. Mappings transform one set of numbers into another set of numbers. We could ...

For the domain, a vertical asymptote is formed. For the range, a horizontal asymptote is formed. To find the inverse of a quadratic function, swap x and y and complete the square. Algebraic Fractions Simplifying To simplify ==> Look for common factor in the numerator and denominator ==> Sometimes we

1. ## Math Portfolio Type II - Applications of Sinusoidal Functions

Calculate the vertical stretch factor that would be required in the transformation of the graph of function f into the graph of function g. The amplitude that represents the time of sunrise in Toronto is 1.627 and the amplitude that represents the time of sunrise in Miami is 0.846.

2. ## Estimate a consumption function for the UK economy explaining the economic theory and statistical ...

however as expected the c1 value is greater than one due to increasing levels of income over time, this could be for a number of reasons although inflation is an obvious one. Inflation is guaranteed to have an effect on consumption as it changes the value of money over each time frame.

1. ## Investigate the relationships between the lengths of the 3 sides of the right angled ...

5a + b = 12 -eqn4 - 3a + b = 8 -eqn5 2a = 4 A = 4/2 A = 2 Substitute A =2 into equation 5 I am doing this to find what B is worth. 5a + b = 12 5 x 2 + b = 12

2. ## Experimentally calculating the wavelength of an He-Ne laser by means of diffraction gratings

Repeat steps 2-6 for the 300 lines/mm diffraction grating and the 100 lines/mm diffraction grating. 8. Measure the distance from the diffraction grating to the screen and record. 9. Using these values, calculate the wavelength of the laser for each fringe order considered for each diffraction grating used. • Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to 