• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Guestimate - Is there a link between a person's ability to estimate the length of a line and their ability to estimate the size of an angle?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Ellen Beardsworth – Maths Coursework - Guestimate

Guestimate

Is there a link between a person’s ability to estimate the length of a line and their ability to estimate the size of an angle?

To begin to investigate this initial hypothesis we did some preliminary testing.  We took our year ten, top maths set and gave them a sheet with two angles, one acute and one obtuse, and two lines, one long and one short, to estimate the size.  We gave everyone a minute and then collected the results.  We took an average guess for each line and angle.  Taking these enabled us to calculate the average percentage error for each angle and line.  The results we found for our class were as follows:

Item

Average

estimate

Calculation

Average

percentage

error

Angle one

(Acute)

58.3 o

3.3 / 55 x 100

6

Angle two

(Obtuse)

152.9 o

2.1 / 55 x 100

1.4

Line one

(Short)

3.98cm

0.28 / 3.7 x 100

7.6

Line two

(Long)

14.3cm

1.8 / 12.5 x 100

14.4

Although these results do not tell

...read more.

Middle

35% of year 10 gave us 45 pupils to look at, we used the computer to calculate the % error for each pupil and then took an average for each line and angle.

image00.png

This bar chart shows that our year 10 top set was quite typical of the whole of year 10, although as the fact it is a top set would indicate it shows they are slightly better.  It shows me that year 10s are better in general at estimating angles than lines, although acute angles and long lines puzzle them more than obtuse angles and short lines, which is surprising as it shows that there isn’t a link between the size of something, e.g. small things are easier to estimate whether it is a line or an angle.

I then moved onto investigating the same hypothesis with a cumulative frequency graph which will tell me for each estimation how many of the people in my year 10 sample were within 10% of the real value, (5% either side).

...read more.

Conclusion

Angle 1

Angle 2

Line 1

Line 2

People within 10%

8

13

6

3

Probability

18%

33.3%

13%

7%

(NB Line 1 only has 44 people as one was an obvious outlier and differed from the rest of the values by 9cm.  Line 2 only has 43 people as two were obvious outliers.)

These results back up what our bar charts of percentage errors tell us.  That people were better at estimating shorter lines and larger angles.  It gives us the following statements:

  • People have a 18% chance of being within 10% of the true value of angle one
  • People have a 33.3% chance of being within 10% of the true value of angle two
  • People have a 13% chance of being within 10% of the true value of line one
  • People have a 7% chance of being within 10% of the true value of line two

This also tells us that year 10s are better at estimating angles than lines which brings me to my second hypothesis.

...read more.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Probability & Statistics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Probability & Statistics essays

  1. Guestimate - investigate how well people estimate the length of lines and the size ...

    To prevent this I am saying that they are not allowed to use their hands in that way, or to touch the paper other than holding it. With lines, I am not choosing whole numbers like 8cm, as these are very obvious and easy to estimate.

  2. Find out whether my theory that year 10 pupils are better at estimating the ...

    that year 10 pupils are better at estimating length than year 7 pupils but the standard deviation shows how the year 10 pupils results are also less reliable than year 7 pupils results. So I believe that both of my results can cancel each other out leaving me no choice but to say the results of my investigation where inconclusive.

  1. Design an investigation to see if there is a significant relationship between the number ...

    This will add reliability to my results. I am carrying out my investigation in September, at the end of summer. This is due to the fact that the Fucus vesiculosus will have experienced the optimum conditions for growth over the summer, so there should be an abundance of thriving Fucus vesiculosus at this time of year.

  2. Estimating the length of a line and the size of an angle.

    I could compare the estimations of each year group, which it could help improve the year group that is not very good at estimating in maths. My aims of this coursework are as followed. 1) Firstly to find out which year group, year 10 or year 11 is better at estimating?

  1. "The lengths of lines are easier to guess than angles. Also, that year 11's ...

    Then, I am going to draw some histograms, using the frequency density from the grouped frequency tables. These will show the density of the data in certain groups. This shows which group had the most estimates in it. Next, I am going to draw some cumulative frequency tables and curves.

  2. Fantasy Football - Maths Coursework - Statistics

    P < 90 |||| |||| 9 23 90 ? P < 120 |||| 5 28 120 ? P < 150 | 1 29 150 ? P < 180 0 29 180 ? P < 210 | 1 30 210 ? P < 140 0 30 240 < P < 270 0 30 Defenders: Points Tally Frequency Cumulative Frequency 0 ?

  1. I believe that year 10 pupils will be better at estimating the length of ...

    told my calculator that my data values went up to 182 the used the "Ran#" button on my calculator to randomly choose the 15 boys. Number Length 1 2 1.00 2 8 1.50 3 12 1.50 4 14 1.50 5 21 1.40 6 33 1.50 7 39 1.50 8 43

  2. Estimation and testing of Hypotheses.

    that examination of this as a factor is out of scope of this exercise. . First hypothesis Raw data: Male Data item Length (cm) 01 4.5 02 5.5 03 5.5 04 5 05 4.5 06 5.5 07 4.5 08 4.9 09 4.5 10 4.5 11 3.9 12 4 13 3.5

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work