• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
1. 1
1
2. 2
2
3. 3
3
4. 4
4
5. 5
5
6. 6
6
7. 7
7
8. 8
8
9. 9
9
10. 10
10
11. 11
11
12. 12
12
13. 13
13
14. 14
14
15. 15
15
16. 16
16
17. 17
17
18. 18
18
19. 19
19

# I am investigating how well people estimate the length of a line and the size of an angle.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

I am investigating how well people estimate the length of a line and the size of an angle. I am going to compare the following: * Year 7 compared to year 10 (Boys and girls) in estimating the size of an acute angle. * Girls compared to boys (Years 7 and 10) in estimating the length of a short line. I am going to compare these two because it is a very wide range of data. I am going to sample 40 people for each investigation, For example: * 40 people from year 7 and, * 40 people from year 10. A questionnaire has been circulated to a variety of people in set 1-5 and year 7-sixth form. The questionnaire includes questions, such as: * Estimate the length of this line * Estimate the size of this angle * Estimate the length of this squiggle For Investigation 1 'Year 7 compared to year 10 in estimating the size of an acute angle' My hypothesis is that a larger amount of year 10 will be better at estimating the size of an angle than year 7. I think that more people from year 10 will be better at estimating the size of an angle because they have been in education longer and are more advanced at maths, while year 7 will be less advanced as they haven't been in education as long as year 10. For Investigation 2 'Girls compared to boys I estimating the length of a short line' My hypothesis is that girls will be better at estimating the length of a line and the size of an angle than boys. I think that girls will be better at estimating the length of a line and the size of an angle than boys because girls take time to study things more closely than boys as boys tend to rush things. I will put all the data I collect in graphs. ...read more.

Middle

THAN YEAR 10. Hypothesis 2: Girls will be better at guessing the size of a short line than boys. Year 7 Females Stratified random sampling: 100 year 7 females in total. 20% of 100= 20. I will therefore take 20 samples. Estimates Error % error 1.5 0 0 1.5 0 0 1.5 0 0 1.5 0 0 1.5 0 0 1.5 0 0 1.5 0 0 1.5 0 0 1.45 0.05 3 1.6 0.1 7 1.6 0.1 7 1.6 0.1 7 1.7 0.2 13 1.2 0.3 20 1.2 0.3 20 1.9 0.4 26 1.9 0.4 26 2 0.5 33 1 0.5 33 0.2 1.3 86 Average Short line percentage error for Girls in year 7: 3 7 7 7 13 20 20 26 26 33 86 464 464- 20= 23.2% average Year 7 Males Stratified random sampling: 110 year 7 males in total. 20% of 110= 22. I will therefore take 22 samples. Estimate Error % error 1.5 0 0 1.5 0 0 1.5 0 0 1.5 0 0 1.6 0.1 7 1.25 0.25 17 1.2 0.3 20 1.2 0.3 20 1.9 0.4 26 1 0.5 33 2 0.5 33 2 0.5 33 2.25 0.75 50 2.5 1 67 2.5 1 67 2.5 1 67 0.04 1.46 97 3 1.5 100 3.2 1.7 113 3.4 1.9 127 3.4 1.9 127 3.4 1.9 127 Average Short line percentage error for Boys in year 7: 7 17 20 20 26 33 33 33 50 67 67 67 97 100 113 127 127 127 1131 1131- 22= 51.40909= 51.4% Year 10 Females Stratified random sampling: 80 year 10 females in total. 20% of 80= 16. I will therefore take 16 samples. Estimates Error % Error 1.5 0 0 1.5 0 0 1.5 0 0 1.5 0 0 1.5 0 0 1.6 0.1 7 1.6 0.1 7 1.3 0.2 13 1.3 0.2 13 1.7 0.2 13 1.7 0.2 13 1.8 0.3 20 1.8 0.3 20 1.9 0.4 26 1 0.5 33 2 0.5 33 Average Short line percentage ...read more.

Conclusion

1/2 37 37-2= 18.5 Median 1/4(36+1) 1/4 37 37-4= 9.25 Lower quartile boundary 3/4(36+1) 3/4 37 (37-4) x3= 27.45 Upper Quartile Boundary Cumulative frequency table leading onto box plot for hypothesis 2 (Girls will be better at guessing the size of a short line than boys) Year 7 and 10 males Groups Frequency Cumulative frequency 0- 12 12 10- 3 15 20- 5 20 30- 6 26 40- 0 26 50- 3 29 60- 7 36 70- 0 36 80- 0 36 90- 1 37 100- 1 38 110- 1 39 120- 3 42 Cumulative frequency: 42 1/2(42+1) 1/2 43 43-2= 21.5 Median 1/4(42+1) 1/4 43 43-4= 10.75 Lower quartile boundary 3/4(42+1) 3/4 42 (43-4) x3= 32.25 Upper Quartile Boundary COUNCLUSION Hypothesis 1: MY HYPOTHESIS WAS PROVED INCORRECT AS ON AVERAGE THE PERCENTAGE ERROR FOR THE ESTIMATION OF AN ACUTE ANGLE WAS LOWER FOR YEAR 7 THAN FOR YEAR 10, MEANING YEAR 7 WERE MORE ACCURATE AND CLOSER TO THE CORRECT NUMBER (ON AVERAGE) THAN YEAR 10. Hypothesis 2: MY HYPOTHESIS WAS PROVED CORRECT AS ON AVERAGE THE PERCENTAGE ERROR FOR THE ESTIMATION OF A SHORT LINE WAS LOWER FOR FEMALES THAN FOR MALES, MEANING FEMALES WERE MORE ACCURATE AND CLOSER TO THE CORRECT NUMBER (ON AVERAGE) THAN MALES. I have evidence in the form of graphs and average calculations to prove my conclusion. My hypothesis works on a base of average. I ruled out all anomalous results before stratifying my samples to avoid biased results which may lead me to conclude my hypothesizes wrong. I think hypothesis 1 was incorrect because among Year 10 we had a few results which were a large percentage error (127%) this bought up my average and made my hypothesis worng. I could improve my project and got better results my sampling more data so I got a more accurate average and by taking out all even slightly anomalous results to stop them from bringing the average percentage error up. To develop my task further, I could have gone on to look at another part of the questionnaire i.e. the estimation of a short squiggle. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Probability & Statistics section.

## Found what you're looking for?

• Start learning 29% faster today
• 150,000+ documents available
• Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
• Join over 1.2 million students every month
• Accelerate your learning by 29%
• Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

# Related AS and A Level Probability & Statistics essays

1. ## The heights of 16-18 year old young adults varies between males and females. My ...

5 star(s)

= V 9.0864 = 3.014 ? = V 9.13 = 3.022 I then had to begin to work out the two levels of confidence intervals for both populations and then compare them. By using the already calculated means, variances and standard deviations, I can then enter them into a new formula for working out the confidence interval.

2. ## Statistics - Men are more accurate than women at estimating the length of a ...

first glance I noticed that men are better at estimating the length of the line, but the angle results are very similar from both genders. Now I have my results from 30 men and 30 women, I am going to draw up some cumulative frequency tables so I can work out the mean number.

1. ## The aim of this investigation was to look at the reliability and validity of ...

the question; also social desirability, giving the answers that you believe will present you in the best light.

2. ## I am going to design and then carry out an experiment to test people's ...

at Withington Girls School DO have faster reaction times in the morning than in the afternoon.' As a small extension, I decided to test three other girls outside our school aged between 11 and 16. This will show whether the data I collected was representative of the entire population of girls aged 11-16.

1. ## Examining Data of 60 year 10 students and 60 year nine students plus 120 ...

The only factor missing is the highest value, which are 80. My scale for the box plot will go up in 10's and start from 30 and end at 90. From the box plot I can easily see that girls in English have a higher median and Q3.As well has a highest value of 87.

2. ## Anthropometric Data

An ellipse with the outlier and an ellipse without the outlier Looking at the two scatter that contains the ellipse, it show that even if the outlier is on or without a drawn ellipse it cannot be drawn around the outlier, as the value far off as result will give a poor model.

1. ## Frequency curves and frequency tables

if we put them into 7 groups, we can have a class interval of 5cm each i.e. 30/7 = 4.29. The heights can therefore be arranged in groups as shown in the following table. Height (cm) tally Frequency 145-149 llll 6 150-154 1lll llll 10 155-159 llll llll 11 160-164

2. ## My first hypothesis is that school pupils can estimate the length of a ...

Otherwise the average wouldn't have been a true representative value. I will show the data on an unequal histogram with the actual size of the angle and length of the line. This way I can not only compare the distribution to the actual angle but also see how concise the estimates were.

• Over 160,000 pieces
of student written work
• Annotated by
experienced teachers
• Ideas and feedback to